A number of people who reviewed it said that it was strong and durable. Dennisb mentioned on Amazon “Seems a lot more sturdy than some of the newer cheaper plastic offerings as long as you have the space to store it” in their review. Friarofdoom wrote “The two extension poles are made of metal so will be pretty durable” in their review. G. D. Foremann mentioned “Any way its great value for money sturdy”.
A few customers who reviewed it considered that it was well made. Lesley gave it an excellent review and he wrote two years ago “Good solid cleaner” in his review. Stuart Staples said in his review of this vacuum cleaner on Amazon also two years ago “Seemingly well built and no denying the theoretical value if you can get for £90 or thereabouts”. Tony C wrote “Solid, reliable product at a good price” and gave it a score of 5 stars.
A number of people wrote that it was reliable. G. Rigby mentioned a few weeks ago “Good suction and a reliable and trusted brand, cheaper on Amazon than on the Vax web site” and gave it a rating of 5 stars. Philip55 mentioned on Amazon two years ago “Same old reliable Vax”. Reader scored this vacuum cleaner 80 out of 100 and mentioned on Amazon “This is a much more reliable piece of kit”.
Two VAX Multivax 3in1 6131T owners mentioned in their reviews that this vacuum cleaner was easy to damage or scratch. Hystericalparoxysm mentioned on Amazon “Only one part has broken (the large, flat head for vacuuming”. Lynn Harvey wrote in his VAX Multivax 3in1 6131T review in December this year “Disappointed as one of the connector pieces for the water feed tube is broken, snapped and a bit left in the pipe” .
One VAX Multivax 3in1 6131T reviewer who reviewed the product reckoned that it was good at resisting water ingress. Friarofdoom wrote “On top of the vacuum there are two waterproof switches” in their review of the VAX Multivax 3in1 6131T and gave the product an excellent rating.