Close
Samsung UN65KU6290
Samsung UN65KU6290
5 Images + 5 Videos
Share on

Loading image...

47

Overall Score

Samsung UN65KU6290

A 65 inch 4K TV with good features
65" 4K No No Aug 2016
Display Diagonal HD Type 3D OLED Technology Release Date

Sorry, currently not available from shops in the United States.
Check international prices

Notify Me When Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Sorry, no international prices found
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Samsung UN65KU6290 Review

With good features and low running costs, we have scored the Samsung UN65KU6290 as follows for Summary.
60
Good Features
20
47
$124 Over 5 Years
Overall Score
47
Mediocre

Why Has it Scored 47?

With it being less than a year since it was released by Samsung, this TV features some of the latest TV technology. View the latest televisions 2017.
It has running costs of $124 over 5 years, which are typical compared to the other 3,997 televisions that we have compared it to. View all energy saving televisions.
This TV has some good features, but is also missing a few features:
Quite large display diagonal
4K
Does not feature OLED technology
Not 3D

Samsung UN65KU6290 Video Reviews


Samsung UN65KU6290 In-Depth Analysis

Features

Quite Large Display Diagonal

The smallest display diagonal of televisions is 2", the largest is 110", and the average display diagonal is 46". The display diagonal of the Samsung UN65KU6290 of 65" is fairly large compared to most other televisions. It is in the largest 9% of all televisions when ordered by this feature.

What does "display diagonal" mean? Less Edit

4K

4K

The UN65KU6290 has a maximum resolution of 4K. That's over four times the resolution of the most frequently found HD type of Full HD. The resolution of all televisions ranges from HD Ready (worst) to 8K (best). 4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

What does "HD type" mean? Less Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The Samsung UN65KU6290 does not feature OLED technology, although it is worth keeping in mind that 98% of TVs also do not feature OLED technology.

What is OLED technology? Less Edit

Not 3D

Like most other televisions, the UN65KU6290 is not 3D. 74% of TVs are not 3D.

What does "3D" mean? Less Edit

Average Thickness

The thickness of the UN65KU6290 of 64.6mm is fairly average compared to most other televisions. It is in the thinnest 1% of all televisions when ranked by this feature.

What does "thickness" mean? Less Edit

Supports Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi

The UN65KU6290 supports Wi-Fi. 59% of televisions also support Wi-Fi.

What is Wi-Fi? Less Edit

3840 X 2160 Pixels Display Resolution

The UN65KU6290 supports a maximum display resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels. That's over four times the resolution of the most frequently found resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Across all televisions the worst resolution is 1024 x 768 pixels and the best is 5120 x 2160 pixels.

What does "display resolution" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has an ECO Mode

The UN65KU6290 has an ECO mode, unlike 93% of TVs which do not have an ECO mode.

What is an ECO mode? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Supports Wi-Fi Direct

The UN65KU6290 supports Wi-Fi Direct, which is unusual. 72% of TVs do not support Wi-Fi Direct.

What is Wi-Fi Direct? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Running Costs

Running Costs Are Average

The UN65KU6290 is typical compared to the other 3,997 TVs that we have assessed for running costs. Based on typical energy prices, we estimate the UN65KU6290 will cost $124 over 5 years to run.

Calculate your own running costs

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers:

samsung un65ku6290fxza

Barcodes:

00887276167756, 00887276176321

Other Popular Comparisons With The Samsung UN65KU6290

Frequently Asked Questions About the Samsung UN65KU6290

78% cheaper to run
35% thinner
Significantly smaller display diagonal
Cheaper to run by $44.49
2% thinner
Better selling
Older by six months
59% cheaper to run
Thinner
63% smaller display diagonal
11% thinner
$69.78 more expensive to run over five years

Feedback