Share on
Samsung UN75J6300 vs Sharp LC-75N8000

Samsung UN75J6300 vs Sharp LC-75N8000

(2)
(1)
Samsung UN75J6300
Sharp LC-75N8000

Top Prices

BrandsMart USA
Checked 13 hours ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 13 hours ago
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 1 day ago
12 Prices from 9 Stores | $1,797.99-$3,486.08
BrandsMart USA
Checked 12 hours ago
Tech For Less
Checked 1 day ago
Raffaffle
Checked 13 hours ago
Delivery unknown
3 Prices from 3 Stores | $1,998.88-$2,949.99

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
$201 cheaper
The Samsung UN75J6300 costs $1,797.99, whereas the Sharp LC-75N8000 is $1,998.88.
Available from 6 shops
The more stores stock this TV, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
$201.83 cheaper to run
The Samsung UN75J6300 only costs $98.20 to run over five years whereas the Sharp LC-75N8000 costs $300.03 to run (206% more). Read more
2 Reasons For
10W higher RMS rated power Edit
The Sharp LC-75N8000 has an RMS rated power of 30WW, however the Samsung UN75J6300 is only a 20WW RMS rated power TV (10W lower). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Expert reviews are better
Based on 1 expert review, the Sharp LC-75N8000 has an average review score of 80%, whereas the Samsung UN75J6300 has an average rating of 74% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
A lot lower RMS rated power Edit
The Samsung UN75J6300 has an RMS rated power of 20WW, whereas the Sharp LC-75N8000 is a 30WW RMS rated power TV (10W higher). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Three months older
The Samsung UN75J6300 is older than the Sharp LC-75N8000 by three months.
Lower expert review Score
The Samsung UN75J6300 only has an average expert rating of 74%, but the Sharp LC-75N8000 has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 1 review).
3 Reasons Against
$201 more expensive
The Sharp LC-75N8000 is more expensive than the Samsung UN75J6300 by $200.89.
Fewer sellers
Only 3 retailers sells the Sharp LC-75N8000, but 9 retailers sell the Samsung UN75J6300. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
206% higher running costs over five years
The Sharp LC-75N8000 costs $300.03 to run which is $201.83 more to run than the Samsung UN75J6300 over five years. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

15 months Ago 12 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 96.25
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.95
Total running cost $ 98.20
Purchase price $ 1,797.99
Total cost of ownership $ 1,896.19
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 295.15
Electricity cost - standby $ 4.88
Total running cost $ 300.03
Purchase price $ 1,998.88
Total cost of ownership $ 2,298.91
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.61T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.61 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
16
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.9T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 1.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
48
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
74.5" 74.5"
HD Type
 4K
 4K
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 4000:1
 4000:1
BEST
High Frequency Rate
120Hz
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Motion Interpolation Frequency
120Hz
BEST
Comb Filter
 3D
 3D
BEST
Response Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.5ms
Display Brightness
360 cd/m²
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Technology
 CMR (Clear Motion Rate)
 CMR (Clear Motion Rate)
Supported Video Mode
 1080p
 2160p
 1080i
 720p
 480i
 480p
 1080p
 2160p
 1080i
 720p
 480i
 480p
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16
 16
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustments
 16:9
BEST
 16:9
Display Diagonal (metric)
189.2cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 1200
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 1200
BEST
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 30W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2
Equalizer Band
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
Audio Decoders
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
Audio Decoding Technology
 DTS Premium Sound 5.1
 DTS Studio Sound
 Dolby MS11
 DTS Premium Sound
 DTS
 1
 DTS Premium Sound 5.1
 DTS Studio Sound
 Dolby MS11
 DTS Premium Sound
 DTS
 1
Speaker
2 2

Smart TV

Lifestyle Apps
 Samsung Smart View
 Samsung Smart Vi
 Samsung Smart View
 Samsung Smart Vi

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
75W 230W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.4W
BEST
1W
Annual Energy Consumption
140kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 110 - 120
 110 - 120
AC Input Frequency
 60
 60
Power Consumption (max)
270W Unknown - Click to provide data

TV Tuner

Tuner Type
 Analog
 Analog
Digital Signal Format System
 ATSC
 ATSC
Analog Signal Format System
 NTSC
 NTSC

Performance

Video Formats Supported
 AVI
 ASF
 VP9
 AVI
 ASF
 VP9
Audio Formats Supported
 MP3
 MP3
Image Formats Supported
 JPG
 JPG
Processor Cores
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Processing Technology
 Samsung Wide Color Enhancer
 Samsung Wide Color Enhancer Plus
 Samsung Wide Color Enhancer
 Samsung Wide Color Enhancer Plus
Video Compression Formats
 HEVC
 HEVC

Packaging Content

Remote Control Type
Cables Included
 HDMI
 AC
 HDMI
 AC

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interfaces
 400 x 400
BEST
 400 x 400

Networking

Wi-Fi Standards
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11ac

Management Features

On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
 EN
 ES
 FR
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
 EN
 ES
 FR
Number of OSD Languages
3 3

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
71.1mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
31.2kg
BEST
49.2kg
Weight With Stand
32kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
317.5mm
BEST
325.12mm
Height (with Stand)
1,046.4mm 1,023.62mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,676.4mm 1,676.4mm
Height
960.1mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width
1,676.4mm 1,676.4mm

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
1 1
RF Port
2
BEST
1
RS-232 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out
1 1
Composite Video in
1 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3
BEST
2
HDMI Port
4 4
Consumer Electronics Control (CEC)
 Anynet+
 Anynet+
Audio (L,R) in
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Audio (L,R) Out
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Technical Details

Network Streaming Services
 Vudu
 Vudu

Packaging Data

Package Weight
43.4kg
BEST
60.7kg
Package Height
1,074.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
299.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
1,811mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback