LG 75UH8500 vs LG OLED65E6 vs Samsung UN75JU6500 vs Sharp LC-75N8000
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Size and Dimensions Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

LG 75UH8500vsLG OLED65E6vsSamsung UN75JU6500vsSharp LC-75N8000

LG 75UH8500

81

Overall Score

81

Overall Score

LG 75UH8500

$4,999.99
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 75" 4K television, with low running costs and one of the largest display diagonals on the market
95
Reviews
26 Reviews + 1 Award
83
Features
Fully-Featured
73
Running Costs
$190 Over 5 Years
81
Overall Score
Excellent
75" 4K No 56mm Feb 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 75"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Feb 2016
Energy Efficiency A
LG OLED65E6

83

Overall Score

83

Overall Score

LG OLED65E6

$4,999.00
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 65" 4K TV, with a good price and low running costs
98
Reviews
219 Reviews + 2 Awards
71
Value for Money
Good
84
Features
Fully-Featured
76
Running Costs
$150 Over 5 Years
83
Overall Score
Excellent
65" 4K Yes 56.7mm Apr 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 65"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology Yes
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung UN75JU6500

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A top-rated and huge 4K 66mm thick television, with low running costs and very good features
97
Reviews
234 Reviews
84
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Running Costs
$170 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
74.5" 4K 66mm Flat Feb 2015
Display Diagonal HD Type Thickness Screen Shape Release Date
Display Diagonal 74.5"
HD Type 4K
Thickness 66mm
Screen Shape Flat
Release Date Feb 2015
Sharp LC-75N8000

76

Overall Score

76

Overall Score

Sharp LC-75N8000

$2,199.00
Our Verdict:
A giant and highly rated 4K TV, with satisfactory running costs and great features
86
Reviews
1 Review
64
Value for Money
Good
81
Features
Fully-Featured
66
Running Costs
$300 Over 5 Years
76
Overall Score
Very Good
74.5" 4K No Yes Aug 2016
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology 3D Release Date
Display Diagonal 74.5"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date Aug 2016
LG 75UH8500

81

Overall Score

81

Overall Score

LG 75UH8500

$4,999.99
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 75" 4K television, with low running costs and one of the largest display diagonals on the market
95
Reviews
26 Reviews + 1 Award
83
Features
Fully-Featured
73
Running Costs
$190 Over 5 Years
81
Overall Score
Excellent
75" 4K No 56mm Feb 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 75"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Feb 2016
Energy Efficiency A
LG OLED65E6

83

Overall Score

83

Overall Score

LG OLED65E6

$4,999.00
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 65" 4K TV, with a good price and low running costs
98
Reviews
219 Reviews + 2 Awards
71
Value for Money
Good
84
Features
Fully-Featured
76
Running Costs
$150 Over 5 Years
83
Overall Score
Excellent
65" 4K Yes 56.7mm Apr 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 65"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology Yes
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung UN75JU6500

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A top-rated and huge 4K 66mm thick television, with low running costs and very good features
97
Reviews
234 Reviews
84
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Running Costs
$170 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
74.5" 4K 66mm Flat Feb 2015
Display Diagonal HD Type Thickness Screen Shape Release Date
Display Diagonal 74.5"
HD Type 4K
Thickness 66mm
Screen Shape Flat
Release Date Feb 2015
Sharp LC-75N8000

76

Overall Score

76

Overall Score

Sharp LC-75N8000

$2,199.00
Our Verdict:
A giant and highly rated 4K TV, with satisfactory running costs and great features
86
Reviews
1 Review
64
Value for Money
Good
81
Features
Fully-Featured
66
Running Costs
$300 Over 5 Years
76
Overall Score
Very Good
74.5" 4K No Yes Aug 2016
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology 3D Release Date
Display Diagonal 74.5"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date Aug 2016

Top Prices

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Amazon US
LG Electronics 75UH8500 75-Inch 4K Ultra HD Smart LED TV (2016 Model)
$4,999.99
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | $4,999.99
eBay
BRAND NEW LG OLED65E6P 65" OLED 4K Ultra HD TV Smart HDTV 3D (Brand new, unopened)
$4,999.00
Go to Store
eBay
LOCAL PICK UP LG OLED65E6P 65" Class OLED 4K Ultra High Definition Smart TV (Brand new, unopened)
$6,898.99
Go to Store
- Show less prices from eBay
Overstock
LG OLED65E6P 65-inch Class 4K UHD Oled television with Smart Tv 3D and WebOs
$5,999.99
Go to Store
3 Prices from 2 Stores | $4,999.00-$6,898.99
No prices found
A A A A Universe
Sharp LC-75N8000U 75" Class (74.5" diag.) AQUOS 4K Ultra HD Smart TV (Brand new, unopened) - on
$2,199.00
Go to Store
eBay
Sharp LC-75N8000U 75" Class (74.5" diag.) AQUOS 4K Ultra HD Smart TV (Brand new, unopened)
$2,570.50
Go to Store
luxurydeals123
Sharp LC-75N8000U 75" Class (74.5" diag.) AQUOS 4K Ultra HD Smart TV (Brand new, unopened) - on
$2,628.48
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | $2,199.00-$2,628.48
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
6 Reasons For
10" Larger Display Diagonal
The LG 75UH8500 has a display diagonal of 75", whereas the LG OLED65E6 is only a 65" TV (10" smaller) and the Samsung UN75JU6500 and the Sharp LC-75N8000 are both only 74.5" TVs (0.5" smaller).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
67% Higher RMS Rated Power
The LG 75UH8500 is a 60W RMS rated power TV. That's 20W higher than the LG OLED65E6 (40W), 40W higher than the Samsung UN75JU6500 (20W) and 30W higher than the Sharp LC-75N8000 (30W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thinner
LG 75UH8500 is 56mm thick. That's 0.7mm thinner than the LG OLED65E6 (56.7mm) and 10mm thinner than the Samsung UN75JU6500 (66mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The LG 75UH8500 has a common interface (CI) slot, and so does the LG OLED65E6, however the Sharp LC-75N8000 does not.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
Better User Reviews
The LG 75UH8500 has an average user review score of 100%, however the LG OLED65E6 has an average rating of 95% (based on 69 reviews) and the Samsung UN75JU6500 has an average rating of 95% (based on 226 reviews).
Better Chip.de Review Score
The LG 75UH8500 has a review score of 94% from Chip.de, whereas the LG OLED65E6's rating was only 90% from the same site.
9 Reasons For
3D
The LG OLED65E6 is 3D, and so is the Sharp LC-75N8000, whereas the LG 75UH8500 is not.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
OLED/QLED Technology
The LG OLED65E6 features OLED/QLED technology, however the LG 75UH8500 and the Sharp LC-75N8000 do not feature OLED/QLED technology.

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The LG OLED65E6 has a common interface (CI) slot, and so does the LG 75UH8500, however the Sharp LC-75N8000 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
49% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the LG OLED65E6 is $36 cheaper to run than the LG 75UH8500, $18 cheaper to run than the Samsung UN75JU6500 and $156 cheaper to run than the Sharp LC-75N8000.
Read more Read less
More Popular
The LG OLED65E6 is a more popular choice amongst buyers.
One More Awards
The LG OLED65E6 has 2 awards from expert review sites, whereas the LG 75UH8500 has 1 award.
Considerably Better Expert Reviews
Based on 21 expert reviews, the LG OLED65E6 has an average review score of 93%, however the LG 75UH8500 has an average rating of 79% (based on 19 reviews) and the Sharp LC-75N8000 has an average rating of 80% (based on 1 review).
Better 4k.com Review Score
4k.com gave the LG OLED65E6 a review score of 93%, whereas the rating of the LG 75UH8500 was only 79% from the same site.
Better Hifitest.de Review Score
Hifitest.de's LG OLED65E6 review gave it a score of 90%, whereas the LG 75UH8500 only has a rating of 80% from the same site.
1 Reason For
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 91.5%, however LG has an average rating of 86.4% and Sharp has an average rating of 25.2%.
3 Reasons For
3D
The Sharp LC-75N8000 is a 3D TV (as is the LG OLED65E6), whereas the LG 75UH8500 is not 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
$2,800 Cheaper
The Sharp LC-75N8000 costs $2,800.99 less than the LG 75UH8500 and costs $2,800 less than the LG OLED65E6.
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.

Reasons Against

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
12 Reasons Against
Not 3D
The LG 75UH8500 is not 3D, however the LG OLED65E6 and the Sharp LC-75N8000 are 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
Does Not Feature OLED/QLED Technology
The LG 75UH8500 does not feature OLED/QLED technology (As does the the Sharp LC-75N8000), but the LG OLED65E6 does.

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Expensive by $2,801
The LG 75UH8500 is $2,801 more expensive than the Sharp LC-75N8000.
Less Retailers
The LG 75UH8500 is only stocked by 1 store, whereas the LG OLED65E6 is stocked by 2 stores and the Sharp LC-75N8000 is stocked by 3 retailers.
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Read more Read less
Older by Six Months
The LG 75UH8500 is two months older than the LG OLED65E6 and six months older than the Sharp LC-75N8000.
$36 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
The running costs over five years of the LG 75UH8500 are $195 which is $36 more than the LG OLED65E6 and $18 more than the Samsung UN75JU6500. Show assumptions.
Less Popular
The LG 75UH8500 is a less popular choice amongst buyers.
One Less Award
The LG 75UH8500 has only received 1 award, whereas the LG OLED65E6 has received 2 awards.
Expert Review Rating is Much Worse
The LG 75UH8500's average expert score is only 79%, however the LG OLED65E6's is 93% (based on 21 reviews) and the Sharp LC-75N8000's is 80% (based on 1 review).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.4%, whereas Samsung has an average rating of 91.5%.
Worse 4k.com Review Score
4k.com only gave the LG 75UH8500 a review score of 79%, whereas the rating of the LG OLED65E6 was 93%.
Worse Hifitest.de Review Score
Whilst the LG 75UH8500 has received a Hifitest.de review score of 80%, the LG OLED65E6 has a score of 90%.
9 Reasons Against
10" Smaller Display Diagonal
The LG OLED65E6 has a display diagonal of 65", whereas the LG 75UH8500 is a 75" TV (10" larger) and the Samsung UN75JU6500 and the Sharp LC-75N8000 are both 74.5" TVs (9.5" larger).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Lower RMS Rated Power
The LG OLED65E6 is a 40W RMS rated power TV. That's 20W lower than the LG 75UH8500 (60W), 20W higher than the Samsung UN75JU6500 (20W) and 10W higher than the Sharp LC-75N8000 (30W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
2% Thicker
LG OLED65E6 is 56.7mm thick. That's 0.7mm thicker than the LG 75UH8500 (56mm) and 9.3mm thinner than the Samsung UN75JU6500 (66mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Expensive by $2,800
The LG OLED65E6 is $2,800 more expensive than the Sharp LC-75N8000.
Less Retailers
The LG OLED65E6 is only stocked by 2 stores, whereas the Sharp LC-75N8000 is stocked by 3 stores.
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Read more Read less
Older by Four Months
The LG OLED65E6 is four months older than the Sharp LC-75N8000.
User Review Rating is Worse
The LG OLED65E6's average user score is 95%, however the LG 75UH8500's is 100% (based on 6 reviews).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.4%, whereas Samsung has an average rating of 91.5%.
Worse Chip.de Review Score
Chip.de's review score for the LG OLED65E6 was only 90%, whereas the LG 75UH8500's rating was 94%.
7 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
The Samsung UN75JU6500 is a 74.5" TV, and so does the Sharp LC-75N8000. That's 0.5" smaller than the LG 75UH8500 (75") and 9.5" larger than the LG OLED65E6 (65").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Two Times Lower RMS Rated Power
The Samsung UN75JU6500 has an RMS rated power of 20W, whereas the LG 75UH8500 is a 60W RMS rated power TV (40W higher), the LG OLED65E6 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher) and the Sharp LC-75N8000 is a 30W RMS rated power TV (10W higher).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
10mm Thicker
The Samsung UN75JU6500 is a 66mm thick TV, whereas the LG 75UH8500 is a 56mm thick TV (10mm thinner) and the LG OLED65E6 is a 56.7mm thick TV (9.3mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not Currently Available
This TV does not seem to be currently available.
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Read more Read less
Over One Year Older
The Samsung UN75JU6500 is older than the LG 75UH8500 by one year, older than the LG OLED65E6 by 14 months and older than the Sharp LC-75N8000 by 18 months.
11% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
The Samsung UN75JU6500 costs $177 to run which is $18 more than the LG OLED65E6 over five years. Show assumptions.
Lower User Review Score
The Samsung UN75JU6500 has an average user rating of 95%, but the LG 75UH8500 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 6 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
The Sharp LC-75N8000 is a 74.5" TV, and so does the Samsung UN75JU6500. That's 0.5" smaller than the LG 75UH8500 (75") and 9.5" larger than the LG OLED65E6 (65").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Does Not Feature OLED/QLED Technology
The Sharp LC-75N8000 does not feature OLED/QLED technology (As does the the LG 75UH8500), but the LG OLED65E6 features OLED/QLED technology.

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

Read more Read less | Edit
Lower RMS Rated Power
The Sharp LC-75N8000 has an RMS rated power of 30W, but the LG 75UH8500 is a 60W RMS rated power TV (30W higher), the LG OLED65E6 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (10W higher) and the Samsung UN75JU6500 is a 20W RMS rated power TV (10W lower).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
98% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
The running costs over five years of the Sharp LC-75N8000 are $316 which is $121 more than the LG 75UH8500, $156 more than the LG OLED65E6 and $139 more than the Samsung UN75JU6500. Show assumptions.
Appreciably Lower Expert Review Score
The Sharp LC-75N8000's average expert rating is 80%, however the LG OLED65E6's is 93% (based on 21 reviews).
Worse Brand
Sharp TVs have an average rating of only 25.2%, whereas LG has an average rating of 86.4% and Samsung has an average rating of 91.5%.

Size and Dimensions

Reviews & Awards

Awards

The LG OLED65E6 has more awards than the LG 75UH8500. The LG OLED65E6 has 2 awards, where as the LG 75UH8500 has 1 award. Compare all award winning TVs.
LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
2 Awards Best
EISA.eu: EISA Best Product geeknetic.es: Editor's Choice
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

The LG OLED65E6 has the best expert reviews out of the four TVs with an average review score of 93% based on 21 reviews. The Sharp LC-75N8000 has the second best expert reviews with an average review score of 80% based on 1 review. The LG 75UH8500 has the third best expert reviews with an average review score of 79% based on 19 reviews.
LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
5 stars
4 reviews
4 stars
10 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
9 reviews
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average User Rating

The LG 75UH8500 has the best user reviews out of the four TVs with an average review score of 100% based on 6 reviews. The LG OLED65E6 and Samsung UN75JU6500 have the second best user reviews each with an average review score of 95%.
LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Best
5 stars
6 reviews
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
60 reviews
4 stars
5 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
3 reviews
1 star
1 review
5 stars
191 reviews
4 stars
23 reviews
3 stars
6 reviews
2 stars
2 reviews
1 star
4 reviews
No reviews found

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has the best brand rating with an average brand rating of 91% based on 114,841 reviews. LG has the second best brand rating with an average brand rating of 86% based on 32,326 reviews. Sharp has the third best brand rating with an average brand rating of 25% based on 3,180 reviews.
LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
LG

86

86

Based on 32,326 reviews
LG

86

86

Based on 32,326 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 114,841 reviews
Sharp

25

25

Based on 3,180 reviews

Proportion of Users That Recommend It

The Samsung UN75JU6500 has the greatest proportion of users recommending it. Out of 230 reviews, 89.6% recommend the Samsung UN75JU6500. 35.5% recommend the LG OLED65E6 and 13.3% recommend the LG 75UH8500.

PC Mag Review Score

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
PC Mag logo
LG has wowed us in the past with its ultra-high-end flagship televisions that use organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology rather than LCD panels, like the Editors' Choice OLED65G6P. As fantastic as OLED televisions are, they're obscenely expen...
Editor's Choice
Excellent color reproduction
Good contrast for an LCD
HDR support
WebOS 3 0 is feature-rich and easy to use
With support for both Dolby Vision and HD 10 formats, the U 8500 can access more high dynamic range content than other TVs
Color accuracy and brightroom performance are solid
The design is attractive, and the motion remote is one of the best available
200hercowy panel LCD IPS o rozdzielczoci UHD, dobra jako wywietlanego obrazu, dobre kty widzenia obrazu, obsuga treci HDR (HD 10 i HDR Dolby Vision), funkcja lokalnego wygaszania podwietlenia ekranu,
Snyggt menysystem och stilig design
Bildkvaliteten r hg p mnga omrden, med extra mjuka rrelser och utmrkt skrpa
LG 65US 850V har et flott menysystem og stilig design
Bildekvaliteten er god p mange omrder, med spesielt glatte bevegelser og utmerket skarphet
Three HDMI ports
A bit light on apps and services
Similarlypriced TVs perform much better
Wysoka cena, statyczny poziom kontrastu bez rewelacji, wykoczenie detali metalowej obudowy nie byo idealne w testowym egzemplarzu, uboga oferta sklepu LG z aplikacjami, niektre aplikacje Smart, jak Ga
Svrtan r en besvikelse och kontrasten r inte fullt i klass med HDRmaterialet som TV
N ska kunna visa
Svartnivet er skuffende, og kontrasten str ikke helt i stil med HDRinnholdet denne TVen skal kunne vise frem
The LG UH8500 line of 4K televisions combine a gorgeous, HDR-capable picture with stylish design elements and an intuitive, feature-rich interface for a very compelling package......
Jun 2016
No data No data
PC Mag logo
Sharp's LC-75N8000U is a massive beast of a 4K television. Its $3,199.99 price tag might seem high, but considering the huge 75-inch screen, and the fact that it can be found for several hundred dollars less than the list price, it's actually one of ...
Excellent contrast and color accuracy
Reasonably priced for the size
Simple, intuitive controls
Multiple flight modes
Included FPV goggles
Great warranty
Very comfortable for longterm wear
Punchy bass response creates warm soundstage
Assortment of tips and sport fins make a perfect fit easy
Ruggedly built, with excellent extended warranty
Firm and consistent fit
Good sound quality
Plenty of gels and wings
Solid battery life
Great price
Powerful, engaging 5.1 surround sound
Full and punchy bass
Detailed upper register
Packed with features
Highly affordable
Excellent battery life
Accurate sleep tracking
Snappy performance
Attractive design
Only router to give you access to all four DFS frequencies
Elegant, internal antenna design
Simple setup and configuration
Excellent performance compared to other routers at the same price
Thoughtful, eyecatching design
Massive, detailed, and engaging soundstage
Warm and deep, with clear, detailed treble
Extremely high sound quality for the price
Environmentally friendly
Quick, easy calibration
Windows Hello support
Adds intuitive and immersive features to games
Remarkably accurate eye tracking
As accessible as ever
Surprisingly good story
Beautiful new continent
World Quests shake up the endgame
Classes new and old are great fun
Versatile
Attractive
Excellent defrosting, Even heatingbrowning
Handy but solid and weatherresistant casing, excellent image quality in the frame centre, sensible image quality on the edge of the frame, negligible longitudinal chromatic aberration, low lateral chr
Fits largest iPad Pro
Can house 13" MacBook Pro or MacBook Air
Gorgeous appearance
Hand crafted
Well designed
Fantastically low price
Reasonably good keyboard and trackpad
Thin and light
Full Windows 10 license included
Brosses trs confortables utiliser
Aspiration performante sur tous les sols
Brosse TriActive avec leds
Recommandations pertinentes de puissance selon usage
La diversin frentica
Variedad de modos de juegos
Tiempos de carga cortos
Diversin asegurada
Variedad de modos
DIGIVRM 160
5X Protection II 160
COM
LPT PCI 160
Opera TV has relatively few major streaming services and apps
Some light bloom in certain situations
Lacks HDR and wide color gamut
Mushy, imprecise controls
Short range
Limited head tracking
Short cable makes some listening scenarios difficult
No sensors or any extras
Neon colors aren't for everyone
Siri and Google Now integration is finicky
Icy touch to the treble
Midrange lacks presence
Interface less than intuitive
Wildly inaccurate heart rate monitor
Dated design
Primitive operating system
Dim screen
No WiFi or GPS support
Cannot compete with modern smartwatches
No USB 3.0 or eSATA ports
No WiFi Protected Setup button
Missing some software features
No 14inch adapter included
No hard case included
Narrow range of supported games
High price
Removing mounts might damage your monitor
Class Order Halls could get old
Some class balance issues
Slow to heat
Lacks a sensor
Noticeable coma, very high vignetting for RAW files
Small, shapely, weatherresistant, optically good, with interesting optical parameters can you ask for more Of course grumblers might carp about high vignetting or coma levels but fighting those aberr
No shoulder strap
Old, weak CPU
Only 32GB of storage
No USB 3.0 ports
Body bends and twists easily
Filtres non lavables
Achat de consommables ncessaire
Flexible rigide et qui s'entortille
Bruyant lors du nettoyage des sols durs
Con el tiempo se vuelve repetitivo
Escenarios y personajes limitados
Modo historia demasiado corto
HDMI
DIM 1080
Sharp's LC-75N8000U 4K TV delivers a huge, 75-inch high-quality picture, but its connected platform lags behind the competition......
Nov 2016

Date Released

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
24 months old 22 months old 36 months old 18 months old Best

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

3D

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Best
No
Yes
unknown
Yes

OLED/QLED Technology

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Best
No
Yes
Best
No

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
No data No data

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 75UH8500
LG
75UH8500
29 trees 1.1 tonnes CO2
LG OLED65E6
LG
OLED65E6
24 trees 0.94 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Samsung UN75JU6500
Samsung
UN75JU6500
27 trees 1.0 tonnes CO2
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
48 trees 1.9 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Display LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Display Diagonal 75"
BEST
65" 74.5" 74.5"
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
Typical Contrast Ratio
4000:1
 4000:1
4000:1
 4000:1
4000:1
 4000:1
4000:1
 4000:1
High Frequency Rate 120Hz
BEST
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
Motion Interpolation Frequency 120Hz
BEST
Comb Filter
3D
 3D
3D
 3D
3D
 3D
3D
 3D
Response Time Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.5ms
Display Brightness 360 Cd/m²
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
2000000:1
 2000000:1
2000000:1
 2000000:1
2000000:1
 2000000:1
2000000:1
 2000000:1
Horizontal Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Supported Video Mode
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
PMI (Picture Mastering Index) 2,700 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
OLED LED
 OLED
 LED
OLED LED
 OLED
 LED
OLED LED
 OLED
 LED
OLED LED
 OLED
 LED
Display Diagonal (metric) 189cm
BEST
164cm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160 3840 x 1200
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 1200
3840 x 2160 3840 x 1200
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 1200
3840 x 2160 3840 x 1200
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 1200
3840 x 2160 3840 x 1200
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 1200
Vertical Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
 
 
 
Audio LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Subwoofer RMS Power 20W 20W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power 60W
BEST
40W 20W 30W
Loudspeaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Equalizer Band Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
Sound Modes
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Speaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2
 
 
 
Smart TV LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Video App
Netflix
 Netflix
Netflix
 Netflix
Netflix
 Netflix
Netflix
 Netflix
Operating System Version Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Other Features LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Dimming Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Power LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Energy Efficiency Class
A
 A
A
 A
A
 A
A
 A
Power Consumption (typical) 178W 145W 130W
BEST
230W
Power Consumption (standby) 0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
1W
Annual Energy Consumption 260kWh 212kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 342W Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
TV Tuner LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Tuner Type
Digital
 Digital
Digital
 Digital
Digital
 Digital
Digital
 Digital
Supported TV Bands
DTV
 DTV
DTV
 DTV
DTV
 DTV
DTV
 DTV
Analog Signal Format System
NTSC
 NTSC
NTSC
 NTSC
NTSC
 NTSC
NTSC
 NTSC
 
 
 
Performance LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Video Formats Supported
VP9
 VP9
VP9
 VP9
VP9
 VP9
VP9
 VP9
Processor Cores 4 4 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Teletext 2,000 Pages 2,000 Pages Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Packaging Content LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
3D Glasses Quantity Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Remote Control Type Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
AC AV
Component
 AC
 AV
 Component
AC AV
Component
 AC
 AV
 Component
AC AV
Component
 AC
 AV
 Component
AC AV
Component
 AC
 AV
 Component
 
 
 
Networking LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Wi-Fi Standards
802.11ac 802.11a
IEEE 802.11a IEEE 802.11ac
802.11n 802.11g
802.11b IEEE 802.11b
IEEE 802.11g IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
802.11ac 802.11a
IEEE 802.11a IEEE 802.11ac
802.11n 802.11g
802.11b IEEE 802.11b
IEEE 802.11g IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
802.11ac 802.11a
IEEE 802.11a IEEE 802.11ac
802.11n 802.11g
802.11b IEEE 802.11b
IEEE 802.11g IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
802.11ac 802.11a
IEEE 802.11a IEEE 802.11ac
802.11n 802.11g
802.11b IEEE 802.11b
IEEE 802.11g IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
 
 
 
Management Features LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Smart Modes
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
Number of OSD Languages Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3 3
Programming Period 8 Day(s) 8 Day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Thickness 56mm 56.7mm
BEST
66mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight 46.8kg 22.8kg
BEST
36.5kg 49.2kg
Weight With Stand 50.3kg 24.8kg
BEST
42.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand) 341mm 200mm
BEST
355.6mm 325.12mm
Height (with Stand) 1,020.3mm 893mm 1,033.8mm 1,023.62mm
Width (with Stand) 1,680.6mm 1,461mm
BEST
1,690mm 1,676.4mm
Height 959mm 893mm 972.8mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width 1,680.6mm 1,461mm 1,690mm 1,676.4mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Headphone Outputs 1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1 1 1
RF Port 2
BEST
2
BEST
2
BEST
1
RS-232 Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1 1 1
Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port 2 2 3
BEST
2
HDMI Port 3 4
BEST
4
BEST
4
BEST
Audio (L,R) in Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Audio (L,R) Out Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Type-A Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RS-232C Port Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Technical Details LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Network Streaming Services
Vudu
 Vudu
Vudu
 Vudu
Vudu
 Vudu
Vudu
 Vudu
 
 
 
Packaging Data LG 75UH8500 LG OLED65E6 Samsung UN75JU6500 Sharp LC-75N8000
Package Weight 61.7kg 31.9kg
BEST
51.3kg 60.7kg
Package Height 1,116mm 1,015mm
BEST
1,122.68mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth 231mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 248.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width 1,823mm 1,600mm
BEST
1,816.1mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Similar Comparisons

LG 75UH8500
LG
75UH8500
$4,999.99
VS
Panasonic TX-58AX800
Panasonic
TX-58AX800
$4,799.95
$200 Cheaper
Expert reviews
are a little
better
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
VS
Samsung QN65Q7
Samsung
QN65Q7
$1,999.99
$199 Cheaper
$2.52 cheaper
to run
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
9.5" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
LG OLED65B7P
LG
OLED65B7P
$2,199.99
Better brand
OLED/QLED
technology
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
Expert reviews are moderately better
VS
Samsung UN60F6300
Samsung
UN60F6300
$2,200.00
Cheaper to run
by $206.03
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
Better brand
VS
Sony XBR-75X940
Sony
XBR-75X940
$2,194.00
$5 Cheaper
60W higher RMS
rated power
Six
loudspeakers
6% cheaper to
run over five
years
Larger display
diagonal
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
A lot higher RMS rated power
10" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
Samsung UN65KS8500
Samsung
UN65KS8500
$2,264.98
Better brand
70% cheaper to
run over five
years
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
3D
VS
Samsung UN75MU8000
Samsung
UN75MU8000
$2,104.39
$95 Cheaper
Better brand
Higher RMS
rated power
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
VS
Samsung UN65KS9800
Samsung
UN65KS9800
$2,099.00
$100 Cheaper
Cheaper to run
by $169.09
Expert reviews
are better
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
13% larger display diagonal
3D
VS
LG OLED65B7
LG
OLED65B7
$2,450.00
Better brand
$150.52 cheaper
to run
Considerably
better expert
reviews
10W higher RMS
rated power
OLED/QLED
technology
Common
interface (CI)
slot
LG OLED65E6
LG
OLED65E6
$4,999.00
Better brand
50% higher RMS rated power
17% thinner
3D
OLED/QLED technology
VS
Sony FWD75X900
Sony
FWD75X900
$3,492.60
$1,506 Cheaper
10" larger
display
diagonal
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
VS
Sony XBR55A1
Sony
XBR55A1
$2,498.00
55% cheaper to
run
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
34% higher RMS rated power
3D
VS
Samsung UN75MU6290
Samsung
UN75MU6290
$1,899.00
$300 Cheaper
50% cheaper to
run over five
years
Better brand
1% larger
display
diagonal
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
34% higher RMS rated power
3% cheaper to run over five years
3D
VS
VIZIO E80-E3
VIZIO
E80-E3
$2,499.99
Better brand
Moderately
larger display
diagonal
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
A lot larger display diagonal
3D
VS
Samsung UN55KS9500
Samsung
UN55KS9500
$1,854.80
$344 Cheaper
Better brand
Cheaper to run
by $225 over
five years
Considerably
better expert
reviews
A lot faster
high frequency
rate
Higher RMS
rated power
Two more
loudspeakers
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
Higher RMS rated power
3D
VS
VIZIO M75-E1
VIZIO
M75-E1
$1,849.99
$349 Cheaper
Better brand
18% cheaper to
run over five
years
0.5" larger
display
diagonal
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
13% larger display diagonal
3D
VS
LG OLED65B6
LG
OLED65B6
$1,799.98
$399 Cheaper
Better brand
50% cheaper to
run
Higher RMS
rated power
OLED/QLED
technology
Common
interface (CI)
slot
LG OLED65E6
LG
OLED65E6
$4,999.00
A bit thinner
0% cheaper to run over five years
3D
VS
LG OLED65E7
LG
OLED65E7
$3,496.99
$1,502 Cheaper
Seven more
awards
User reviews
are better
Expert reviews
are a bit
better
20W higher RMS
rated power
LG OLED65E6
LG
OLED65E6
$4,999.00
$31 cheaper to run over five years
3D
VS
Samsung QN75Q7
Samsung
QN75Q7
$3,299.00
$1,700 Cheaper
More popular
Better brand
13% larger
display
diagonal
3.7mm thinner
LG OLED65E6
LG
OLED65E6
$4,999.00
Better brand
Cheaper to run by $374 over five years
50% higher RMS rated power
25% higher subwoofer RMS power
OLED/QLED technology
Common interface (CI) slot
VS
Sharp LC-70UD1U
Sharp
LC-70UD1U
$2,999.88
$1,999 Cheaper
A little larger
display
diagonal
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Samsung UN75JU6500
Samsung
UN75JU6500
$0.00
Better brand
$133.91 cheaper to run
VS
Sharp LC-75N8000
Sharp
LC-75N8000
$2,199.00
10W higher RMS
rated power
3D