Share on
Hisense H49M3000 vs Hisense H50M3300

Hisense H49M3000 vs Hisense H50M3300

(15)
(13)
Hisense H49M3000
Hisense H50M3300

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

No data 4 Reasons For
2% larger display diagonal Edit
The Hisense H50M3300 is a 50"" TV. That's 1" larger than the Hisense H49M3000 (50""). Read more

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

20% higher RMS rated power Edit
The Hisense H50M3300 has an RMS rated power of 20WW, however the Hisense H49M3000 is only a 16WW RMS rated power TV (4W lower). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Cheaper to run by $1.40
The Hisense H50M3300 only costs $114.08 to run over five years however the Hisense H49M3000 costs $115.48 to run (1% more). Read more
User reviews are better
The Hisense H50M3300 has an average user review score of 98%, whereas the Hisense H49M3000 has an average rating of 91% (based on 14 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The Hisense H49M3000 has a display diagonal of 49"", but the Hisense H50M3300 is a 50"" TV (1" larger). Read more

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

25% lower RMS rated power Edit
The Hisense H49M3000 is a 16WW RMS rated power TV. That's 4W lower than the Hisense H50M3300 (20WW). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Older by one month
The Hisense H49M3000 is one month older than the Hisense H50M3300.
$1.40 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Hisense H49M3000 are $115.48 which is $1.40 more than the Hisense H50M3300. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the Hisense H49M3000 is 91%, whereas the average user rating of the Hisense H50M3300 is 98% (based on 13 reviews).
No data

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

16 months Ago 15 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 115.48
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 115.48
Electricity cost - switched on $ 111.64
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.44
Total running cost $ 114.08

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.72T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.72 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.71T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.71 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
49" 50"
BEST
HD Type
 4K
 4K
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 6000:1
BEST
 6000:1
High Frequency Rate
800Hz
BEST
Display Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Motion Interpolation Frequency
800Hz 800Hz
Display Brightness
LED Backlighting Type
 LED
 LED
Screen Shape
 Flexible
 Flexible
Motion Interpolation Technology
 Smart Motion Rate (SMR)
 Smart Motion Rate (SMR)
Aspect Ratio
 16
 16
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 102cm

Audio

RMS Rated Power
16W 20W
BEST
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby MS10
 1
 Dolby MS10
 1
Speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Smart TV

Video App
 Netflix
 YouTube
 YuppTV
BEST
 Netflix
 YouTube
 YuppTV
Lifestyle Apps
 Facebook
 Twitter
BEST
 Facebook
 Twitter
News Apps
 BBC
 BBC
Operating System Installed
 VIDAA
 VIDAA

Other Features

Sound Enhancement Technology
Unknown - Click to provide data
Speakers
Unknown - Click to provide data
DVB
Unknown - Click to provide data
Smart TV Applications
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Content
Unknown - Click to provide data
Material
 Plastic
 Plastic

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
Power Consumption (typical)
90W 87W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
130kWh 127kWh
BEST

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+

Performance

Video Formats Supported
 VRO
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 RM
 FLV
 3GP
 MOV
 MPG
 MPEG
 MKV
 VOB
 TS
 MTS
 WEBM
 VRO
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 RM
 FLV
 3GP
 MOV
 MPG
 MPEG
 MKV
 VOB
 TS
 MTS
 WEBM
Audio Formats Supported
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 MP4
 WMA
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 MP4
 WMA
Image Formats Supported
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 JPEG XR
 MPO
 WEBP
 PNS
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 JPEG XR
 MPO
 WEBP
 PNS
Teletext
Unknown - Click to provide data 899 pages
Google Application
 YouTube
 YouTube
Social Network Service
 Twitter
 Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interfaces
 200 x 200
 200 x 200

Management Features

Smart Modes
 Store
 Custom
 Store
 Custom
Number of OSD Languages
19
BEST
17

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
Unknown - Click to provide data 85mm
Weight
12.7kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 13kg
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 241mm
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 693mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,120mm
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 651mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,120mm

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Composite Video in
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Audio (L,R) in
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Packaging Data

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 17kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,760mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,234mm

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback