It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Household
Technology
Home Latest Articles TVs 5 Best TVs Under $200 in the US - July 2020

5 Best TVs Under $200 in the US - July 2020

Matthew
Updated 24 May 2020
TVs
Share on


5 best TVs under $200

What TV Under $200 to Buy in June 2020?

Best Buy Great Price
Samsung UN32J4000 Sceptre X322BVSR Supersonic SC1911 Sharp LC-60LE831 Curtis PLDED3273A
Samsung UN32J4000 Sceptre X322BVSR Supersonic SC1911 Sharp LC-60LE831 Curtis PLDED3273A
$162.75 Buy Now
BuyDig
Buy Now
$89.99 Buy Now
Walmart
Buy Now
$104.99 Buy Now
Walmart
Buy Now
$110.00 Buy Now
eBay
Buy Now
$184.99 Buy Now
Overstock
Buy Now
46" No Price
60" $110
HD
32"
69mm
THICK
32"
79mm
THICK
$65
OVER 5 YEARS
NOT
SUPPOR-
TED
19"
47.5mm
THICK
60"
34mm
THICK
HD
32"
210mm
THICK
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
97
Reviews
197 Reviews
88
Features
Fully-Featured
88
Popularity
Quite Popular
88
Value for Money
Very Good
89
Kagoo Score
Excellent
93
Reviews
881 Reviews
86
Features
Fully-Featured
80
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
95
Running Costs
$64 Over 5 Years
86
Kagoo Score
Excellent
53
Brand Rating
Average Brand
86
Features
Fully-Featured
92
Popularity
Widely Available
86
Value for Money
Very Good
97
Running Costs
$53 Over 5 Years
86
Kagoo Score
Excellent
93
Reviews
17 Reviews + 2 Awards
85
Features
Fully-Featured
84
Value for Money
Very Good
82
Running Costs
$120 Over 5 Years
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent
95
Reviews
869 Reviews
85
Features
Fully-Featured
84
Value for Money
Very Good
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent
A classic and fully featured 32", 69mm thick TV, with a cheap price. It supports Picture-in-Picture and has a desktop stand included. Multiple reviews mentioned that this TV has very good picture quality and sound quality, and it's an outstanding size. An excellently reviewed and breathtakingly economical to run hd ready 32" TV, with a very good spec and a low price. Our review analysis indicates that this TV has good picture quality, sound quality and it's good-looking. A fully featured and phenomenally economical to run 19", 47.5mm thick TV, with a fair price. An award winning and thin full hd 60" TV, with a very good spec and very low running costs. It has an auto volume leveler and an ethernet port, is 3D and supports Wi-Fi. Multiple reviews mentioned that this TV has an excellent 3D picture quality, superb picture quality and it's good at displaying high definition TV. A classic and fully featured 32", 210mm thick TV, with a fair price. Multiple reviews mentioned that this TV has superb picture quality, good sound quality and it's very easy to setup.
Samsung UN32J4000 size in context Sceptre X322BVSR size in context Supersonic SC1911 size in context Sharp LC-60LE831 size in context
11 Reasons For
Picture-in-Picture
Desktop Stand Included
Better Kagoo Score
User Reviews Are Better
Overall Reviews Are Better
Better Brand
More Reasonably Priced
Better in Terms of Size
Easier to Use
Better At Producing a High Quality Picture
Has Better Sound Quality
3 Reasons For
Cheaper by $15
Newer by 11 Months
Has a Better Remote Control
4 Reasons For
Faster Response Time
Noise Reduction
More Shops Are Selling It
Cheaper to Run by $68 Over Five Years
12 Reasons For
Full Hd
A Lot Larger Display Diagonal
84% Thinner
A Lot Faster High Frequency Rate
Built-in Subwoofer
Auto Volume Leveler
Higher RMS Rated Power
3D
Wi-Fi
Ethernet Port
Desktop Stand Included
Two More Awards
4 Reasons For
Twice As High Typical Contrast Ratio
50 Cd/m² Brighter Display Brightness
More Reliable
More Carefully Designed
10 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
A Lot Thicker
Slower High Frequency Rate
10W Lower RMS Rated Power
Not 3D
Does Not Support Wi-Fi
Does Not Have an Ethernet Port
$73 More Expensive
Less Retailers
11 Months Older
17 Reasons Against
Half the Display Resolution
A Lot Smaller Display Diagonal
37% Thicker
Not 3D
Worse Kagoo Score
Not As Many Stockists
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $11
User Review Rating is Considerably Worse
Overall Review Rating is Considerably Worse
Worse Brand
Has a Worse Price
Less Solidly Made
A Worse Size
Has a Worse Design
Harder to Use
Has a Worse Image Quality
Worse At Producing High Quality Audio
12 Reasons Against
41" Smaller Display Diagonal
23% Thicker
Only Low (1000:1) Typical Contrast Ratio
17% Dimmer Display Brightness
70% Lower RMS Rated Power
Not 3D
Does Not Support Wi-Fi
Does Not Have an Ethernet Port
Worse Kagoo Score
More Expensive by $15
Older by Over Five Years
Worse Brand
8 Reasons Against
Worse Kagoo Score
More Expensive by $20
Fewer Sellers
Older by Over One Year
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $68
Overall Review Rating is Considerably Worse
Worse Brand
Has a Worse Image Quality
20 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
A Lot Thicker
Slower High Frequency Rate
2.5ms Slower Response Time
Not 3D
Does Not Support Wi-Fi
Does Not Have an Ethernet Port
Worse Kagoo Score
$95 More Expensive
Not As Many Stockists
Over Four Years Older
Lower User Review Score
Lower Overall Review Score
Worse Brand
Has a Worse Price
A Worse Size
Harder to Use
Produces Inferior Picture Quality
Has Worse Sound Quality
Has a Worse Useful Remote Control
 Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details

Samsung UN32J4000

$162.75
BuyDig

Samsung UN32J4000

Buy Now
Samsung UN32J4000
HD
32"
69mm
THICK
60Hz
REFRESH RATE

The Samsung UN32J4000 has a Kagoo Score of 89. However with a price tag of $162.75 this TV is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Samsung UN32J4000 or read our article on whether you should buy a Samsung TV.

Features We Love:
Wide color enhancer
Ultra slim wall mount support
Supports Picture-in-Picture
Desktop stand included
Energy Star certified

A classic and fully featured 32", 69mm thick TV, with a cheap price. It supports Picture-in-Picture and has a desktop stand included. Multiple reviews mentioned that this TV has very good picture quality and sound quality, and it's an outstanding size.

97
Reviews
197 Reviews
88
Features
Fully-Featured
88
Popularity
Quite Popular
88
Value for Money
Very Good
89
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Multiple reviews mentioned that Samsung UN32J4000 has brilliant user reviews with 94% of buyers recommending this TV to others.

Samsung UE32J4000. ???????? ? ???????????. 32J4000 UN32J4000 review and unboxing
Samsung UE32J4000. ???????? ? ???????????. 32J4000 UN32J4000 review and unboxing

11 Reasons For for Choosing the Samsung UN32J4000

Picture-in-Picture

The Samsung UN32J4000 supports Picture-in-Picture, however the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Sceptre X322BVSR, the Sharp LC-60LE831 and the Supersonic SC1911 do not. More ...

Picture-in-Picture is a special mode for a TV that allows two programs to be shown at the same time, one in a smaller screen overlaid on top of the first.

Picture-in-Picture on a TV is very helpful for browsing the net or taking Skype calls while still watching a movie or TV programme on the main screen.

Desktop Stand Included

The Samsung UN32J4000 has a desktop stand included, and so does the Sharp LC-60LE831, however the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 do not. More ...

Whether the TV has a desktop stand included with the purchase.

A desktop stand allows you to mount the TV on a desk or table for easy viewing. Without one, you'll have to either mount the TV on a wall or buy a stand at additional expense.

Better Kagoo Score

The Samsung UN32J4000 has received a Kagoo Score of 89, however the Curtis PLDED3273A scored 83, the Sceptre X322BVSR scored 86, the Sharp LC-60LE831 scored 83 and the Supersonic SC1911 scored 86.

User Reviews Are Better

Based on 197 user reviews, the average review score of the Samsung UN32J4000 is 91%, however the average rating of the Curtis PLDED3273A is 85% (based on 869 reviews) and the average rating of the Sceptre X322BVSR is 75% (based on 881 reviews).

Overall Reviews Are Better

Based on 197 reviews, the average review score of the Samsung UN32J4000 is 91%, however the average rating of the Curtis PLDED3273A is 85% (based on 869 reviews), the average rating of the Sceptre X322BVSR is 75% (based on 881 reviews) and the average rating of the Sharp LC-60LE831 is 79% (based on 17 reviews).

Better Brand

Samsung TVs have an average rating of 94.7%, whereas Curtis only has an average rating of 68%, Sceptre only has an average rating of 73.7%, Sharp only has an average rating of 75.6% and Supersonic only has an average rating of 83.9%.

More Reasonably Priced

Our analysis of the Samsung UN32J4000 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Samsung UN32J4000 was more reasonably priced. Two people thought that it wasn't expensive.

Better in Terms of Size

Our analysis of the Samsung UN32J4000 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Samsung UN32J4000 was better in terms of size. More than 10 people thought that it was a brilliant size.

Easier to Use

Our analysis of the Samsung UN32J4000 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Samsung UN32J4000 was easier to use. Several people thought that it was very easy to use and to setup.

Better At Producing a High Quality Picture

Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Samsung UN32J4000 was better at producing a high quality picture. More than 60 people thought that it had superb picture quality and several people thought that it also had a brilliant screen, had good colour saturation and had a good contrast ratio.

Has Better Sound Quality

On average reviewers thought the Samsung UN32J4000 has better sound quality. Over 10 people thought that it had good sound quality.

10 Reasons Against for Choosing the Samsung UN32J4000

Smaller Display Diagonal

The Samsung UN32J4000 is a 32 TV, and so do the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Sceptre X322BVSR. That's 28" smaller than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (60") and 13" larger than the Supersonic SC1911 (19"). More ...

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

A Lot Thicker

Samsung UN32J4000 is 69 thick, but the Curtis PLDED3273A is a 210mm thick TV (141mm thicker), the Sceptre X322BVSR is a 79mm thick TV (10mm thicker), the Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 34mm thick TV (35mm thinner) and the Supersonic SC1911 is a 47.5mm thick TV (21.5mm thinner). More ...

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Slower High Frequency Rate

The Samsung UN32J4000 has a high frequency rate of 60, and so does the Curtis PLDED3273A. That's 40Hz slower than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (100Hz). More ...

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

10W Lower RMS Rated Power

The Samsung UN32J4000 has an RMS rated power of 10, but the Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 20W RMS rated power TV (10W higher) and the Supersonic SC1911 is a 6W RMS rated power TV (4W lower). More ...

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Not 3D

The Samsung UN32J4000 is not 3D (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911), however the Sharp LC-60LE831 is. More ...

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The Samsung UN32J4000 does not support Wi-Fi (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Supersonic SC1911), however the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 do. More ...

A Wifi (wireless LAN connection) on your TV means that you can connect your TV directly to your WiFi network.

A wifi connection means that connecting your TV to the net will be easier and can be done without cables.

Does Not Have an Ethernet Port

The Samsung UN32J4000 does not have an ethernet port (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Supersonic SC1911), but the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 have this feature. More ...

An ethernet port lets you connect the TV directly to your router with an ethernet cable.

An ethernet connection is more reliable than wifi and is useful if you do not have a wiki network or the wifi signal is weak. Depending on the speed of your wifi network and ethernet connection may be faster than wifi which means less buffering when streaming content to the TV.

$73 More Expensive

The Samsung UN32J4000 is more expensive than the Sceptre X322BVSR by $73, more expensive than the Sharp LC-60LE831 by $53 and more expensive than the Supersonic SC1911 by $58.

Less Retailers

Only 5 sellers sells the Samsung UN32J4000, whereas 8 sellers sell the Supersonic SC1911. More ...

Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
11 Months Older

The Samsung UN32J4000 is older than the Sceptre X322BVSR by 11 months.

The Samsung UN32J4000 is 745.4mm wide, 69mm tall, 433.9mm thick and weighs 3.7kg.

Samsung UN32J4000 front view

The cheapest price that we could find for the UN32J4000 in the US is $162.75 and in total we found 5 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
Walmart
Out of stock
$147.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Official Outlet
$162.75
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Official Outlet
$239.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
- Show less prices from BuyDig
loading image
Out of stock
$199.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$199.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$200.00
Go to Store
- Show less prices from eBay
loading image
Store
$249.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
7 Prices from 5 Stores | $162.75 - $249.99
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Sceptre X322BVSR

$89.99
Walmart

Sceptre X322BVSR

Buy Now
Sceptre X322BVSR
32"
79mm
THICK
$65
OVER 5 YEARS
A

The Sceptre X322BVSR has a Kagoo Score of 86. With a price tag of $89.99 this TV is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Sceptre X322BVSR or read our article on whether you should buy a Sceptre TV.

An excellently reviewed and breathtakingly economical to run hd ready 32" TV, with a very good spec and a low price. Our review analysis indicates that this TV has good picture quality, sound quality and it's good-looking.

93
Reviews
881 Reviews
86
Features
Fully-Featured
80
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
95
Running Costs
$64 Over 5 Years
86
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Our review analysis indicates that Sceptre X322BVSR has good user reviews with an average user rating of 75%, based on 881 reviews.

3 Reasons For for Choosing the Sceptre X322BVSR

Cheaper by $15

The Sceptre X322BVSR costs $89.99, whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A is $184.99, the Samsung UN32J4000 is $162.75, the Sharp LC-60LE831 is $110.00 and the Supersonic SC1911 is $104.99.

Newer by 11 Months

The Sceptre X322BVSR was released three years ago, but the Curtis PLDED3273A was released seven years ago, the Samsung UN32J4000 was released four years ago, the Sharp LC-60LE831 was released five years ago and the Supersonic SC1911 was released eight years ago

Has a Better Remote Control

On average reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR has a better remote control. Over 10 people thought that it had a superb remote control.

17 Reasons Against for Choosing the Sceptre X322BVSR

Half the Display Resolution

The Sceptre X322BVSR is hd ready, however the Sharp LC-60LE831 is full hd. More ...

HD Type on a TV refers to the type of high definition image that the TV is capable of displaying (e.g. Full HD, 4K Ultra HD).

The better the HD type the better the image resolution and the perceived sharpness of the image will be. Images will appear more life like and realistic. This will be more noticeable on a TV with a larger display diagonal.

A Lot Smaller Display Diagonal

The Sceptre X322BVSR has a display diagonal of 32 (as do the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Samsung UN32J4000), however the Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 60" TV (28" larger) and the Supersonic SC1911 is a 19" TV (13" smaller). More ...

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

37% Thicker

The Sceptre X322BVSR is a 79 thick TV. That's 131mm thinner than the Curtis PLDED3273A (210mm), 10mm thicker than the Samsung UN32J4000 (69mm), 45mm thicker than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (34mm) and 31.5mm thicker than the Supersonic SC1911 (47.5mm). More ...

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Not 3D

The Sceptre X322BVSR is not 3D (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Supersonic SC1911), but the Sharp LC-60LE831 is. More ...

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Sceptre X322BVSR has received a Kagoo Score of 86, but the Samsung UN32J4000 scored 89.

Not As Many Stockists

The Sceptre X322BVSR is only stocked by 2 retailers, however the Samsung UN32J4000 is stocked by 5 shops and the Supersonic SC1911 is stocked by 8 stores. More ...

Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $11

The running costs over five years of the Sceptre X322BVSR are $65 which is $11 more than the Supersonic SC1911. Show assumptions.

User Review Rating is Considerably Worse

The Sceptre X322BVSR only has an average user score of 75%, but the Curtis PLDED3273A has an average user rating of 85% (based on 869 reviews) and the Samsung UN32J4000 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 197 reviews).

Overall Review Rating is Considerably Worse

The Sceptre X322BVSR only has an average overall score of 75%, but the Curtis PLDED3273A has an average overall rating of 85% (based on 869 reviews), the Samsung UN32J4000 has an average overall rating of 91% (based on 197 reviews) and the Sharp LC-60LE831 has an average overall rating of 79% (based on 17 reviews).

Worse Brand

Sceptre TVs have an average rating of only 73.7%, however Samsung has an average rating of 94.7%, Sharp has an average rating of 75.6% and Supersonic has an average rating of 83.9%.

Has a Worse Price

On average reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR has a worse price.

Less Solidly Made

Our analysis of the Sceptre X322BVSR reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR was less solidly made.

A Worse Size

The Sceptre X322BVSR reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR was a worse size.

Has a Worse Design

Our analysis of the Sceptre X322BVSR reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR has a worse design.

Harder to Use

The Sceptre X322BVSR reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR was harder to use.

Has a Worse Image Quality

On average reviewers thought the Sceptre X322BVSR has a worse image quality.

Worse At Producing High Quality Audio

Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Sceptre X322BVSR was worse at producing high quality audio.

The Sceptre X322BVSR is 79mm tall.

Sceptre X322BVSR front view

The cheapest price that we could find for the X322BVSR in the US is $89.99 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
Walmart
$89.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$105.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$139.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$215.58
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$200.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$200.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$179.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$159.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$159.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$150.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$150.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$149.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$149.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$145.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$138.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$107.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$135.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$132.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$130.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$129.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$125.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$122.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$121.77
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$120.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$119.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$114.98
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$109.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$108.99
Standard delivery: $3.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$301.63
Go to Store
- Show less prices from eBay
29 Prices from 2 Stores | $89.99 - $301.63
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Supersonic SC1911

$104.99
Walmart

Supersonic SC1911

Buy Now
Supersonic SC1911
NOT
SUPPOR-
TED
19"
47.5mm
THICK
$54
OVER 5 YEARS

The Supersonic SC1911 has a Kagoo Score of 86. With a price tag of $104.99 this TV is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Supersonic SC1911.

Features We Love:
Thinner than average (47.5mm)
Supports noise reduction
Faster than average response time (5.5ms)
PC in (D-Sub) port

A fully featured and phenomenally economical to run 19", 47.5mm thick TV, with a fair price.

86
Features
Fully-Featured
92
Popularity
Widely Available
86
Value for Money
Very Good
97
Running Costs
$53 Over 5 Years
86
Kagoo Score
Excellent

4 Reasons For for Choosing the Supersonic SC1911

Faster Response Time

The Supersonic SC1911 is a 5.5 response time TV. That's 2.5ms faster than the Curtis PLDED3273A (8ms). More ...

'Response Time' is the measure of how long it takes an individual pixel to move from active to inactive - therefore how fast it takes the TV to respond to the signal it's receiving and display it on the screen.

Slow response times on a TV mean that signals on fast moving images (such as video games or sports) could clash together, creating blurry images as several slightly different signals attempt to be displayed at once. A TV with faster response times can therefore display fast-moving images sharply and cleanly.

Noise Reduction

The Supersonic SC1911 supports noise reduction, whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 do not support this feature. More ...

Noise reduction helps reduce intrusive audio and visual noise for a clearer and better viewing experience.

More Shops Are Selling It

A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.

Cheaper to Run by $68 Over Five Years

Over five years the Supersonic SC1911 only costs $54 to run however the Sceptre X322BVSR costs $65 to run (20% more) and the Sharp LC-60LE831 costs $122 to run (126% more). More ...

12 Reasons Against for Choosing the Supersonic SC1911

41" Smaller Display Diagonal

The Supersonic SC1911 has a display diagonal of 19, but the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Sceptre X322BVSR are all 32" TVs (13" larger) and the Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 60" TV (41" larger). More ...

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

23% Thicker

The Supersonic SC1911 has a thickness of 47.5. That's 162.5mm thinner than the Curtis PLDED3273A (210mm), 21.5mm thinner than the Samsung UN32J4000 (69mm), 31.5mm thinner than the Sceptre X322BVSR (79mm) and 13.5mm thicker than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (34mm). More ...

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Only Low (1000:1) Typical Contrast Ratio

The Supersonic SC1911 has a low (1000:1) typical contrast ratio, which is half as high typical contrast ratio as the Curtis PLDED3273A (medium). We do not know what type of typical contrast ratio the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 have. More ...

'Contrast Ratio' is a measure of the image contrast that the TV is capable of producing - it is the difference between the brightness of the darkest black and brightest white that the TV can produce. The higher the contrast ratio the better the contrast.

A higher contrast ratio means that the TV can product darker blacks and brighter whites, resulting in better image quality. So a TV with a contrast ratio of 1000:1 can produce whites which are 1000 times brighter than the darkest black that the TV can produce.

17% Dimmer Display Brightness

The Supersonic SC1911 has a display brightness of 250, however the Curtis PLDED3273A is a 300 Cd/m² display brightness TV (50 cd/m² brighter). More ...

'Display Brightness' is a measure of how bright the screen on the TV is.

A brighter display means the screen will have a greater capacity for brightness. This can be useful in combating glare from the sun in very bright rooms, or for making the screen visible from further away.

70% Lower RMS Rated Power

The Supersonic SC1911 is a 6 RMS rated power TV. That's 4W lower than the Samsung UN32J4000 (10W) and 14W lower than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (20W). More ...

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Not 3D

The Supersonic SC1911 is not 3D (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Sceptre X322BVSR), whereas the Sharp LC-60LE831 is. More ...

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The Supersonic SC1911 does not support Wi-Fi (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Samsung UN32J4000), whereas the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 support this feature. More ...

A Wifi (wireless LAN connection) on your TV means that you can connect your TV directly to your WiFi network.

A wifi connection means that connecting your TV to the net will be easier and can be done without cables.

Does Not Have an Ethernet Port

The Supersonic SC1911 does not have an ethernet port (As do the the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Samsung UN32J4000), however the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 do. More ...

An ethernet port lets you connect the TV directly to your router with an ethernet cable.

An ethernet connection is more reliable than wifi and is useful if you do not have a wiki network or the wifi signal is weak. Depending on the speed of your wifi network and ethernet connection may be faster than wifi which means less buffering when streaming content to the TV.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Supersonic SC1911 has received a Kagoo Score of 86, whereas the Samsung UN32J4000 scored 89.

More Expensive by $15

The Supersonic SC1911 is $15 more expensive than the Sceptre X322BVSR.

Older by Over Five Years

The Supersonic SC1911 is nine months older than the Curtis PLDED3273A, four years older than the Samsung UN32J4000, five years older than the Sceptre X322BVSR and four years older than the Sharp LC-60LE831.

Worse Brand

Supersonic TVs have an average rating of only 83.9%, but Samsung has an average rating of 94.7%.

The Supersonic SC1911 is 462mm wide, 47.5mm tall and 330mm thick.

Supersonic SC1911 front view

The cheapest price that we could find for the SC1911 in the US is $104.99 and in total we found 8 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
Walmart
$104.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$131.44
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$135.18
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$135.32
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$143.89
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$149.06
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$157.60
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$164.00
Go to Store
- Show less prices from eBay
loading image
90 Day Limited Manufacturer
$150.51
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$159.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
10 Prices from 8 Stores | $104.99 - $164.00
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Sharp LC-60LE831

$110.00
eBay

Sharp LC-60LE831

Buy Now
Sharp LC-60LE831
60"
34mm
THICK
100Hz
REFRESH RATE
$122
OVER 5 YEARS
A

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has a Kagoo Score of 83. With a price tag of $110.00 this TV is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Sharp LC-60LE831 or read our article on whether you should buy a Sharp TV.

Features We Love:
Large display diagonal (60")
3D
Thinner than average (34mm)
Supports Wi-Fi
Auto volume leveler

An award winning and thin full hd 60" TV, with a very good spec and very low running costs. It has an auto volume leveler and an ethernet port, is 3D and supports Wi-Fi. Multiple reviews mentioned that this TV has an excellent 3D picture quality, superb picture quality and it's good at displaying high definition TV.

93
Reviews
17 Reviews + 2 Awards
85
Features
Fully-Featured
84
Value for Money
Very Good
82
Running Costs
$120 Over 5 Years
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Our review analysis indicates that Sharp LC-60LE831 has good expert reviews with an average expert rating of 78%, based on 17 reviews.

Trusted Reviews Recommended
avforums.com Recommended

12 Reasons For for Choosing the Sharp LC-60LE831

Full Hd

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is full hd, but the Sceptre X322BVSR is only hd ready. More ...

HD Type on a TV refers to the type of high definition image that the TV is capable of displaying (e.g. Full HD, 4K Ultra HD).

The better the HD type the better the image resolution and the perceived sharpness of the image will be. Images will appear more life like and realistic. This will be more noticeable on a TV with a larger display diagonal.

A Lot Larger Display Diagonal

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has a display diagonal of 60, but the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Sceptre X322BVSR are all only 32" TVs (28" smaller) and the Supersonic SC1911 is only a 19" TV (41" smaller). More ...

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

84% Thinner

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has a thickness of 34. That's 176mm thinner than the Curtis PLDED3273A (210mm), 35mm thinner than the Samsung UN32J4000 (69mm), 45mm thinner than the Sceptre X322BVSR (79mm) and 13.5mm thinner than the Supersonic SC1911 (47.5mm). More ...

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

A Lot Faster High Frequency Rate

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 100 refresh rate TV, whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A and the Samsung UN32J4000 are both only 60Hz refresh rate TVs (40Hz slower). More ...

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Built-in Subwoofer

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has a built-in subwoofer, whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 do not have this feature. More ...

A subwoofer is a specialised bass speaker for your TV, designed to provide punchy and powerful low notes for music and movies. Alternatively, an underground dog.

A built-in subwoofer will give your TV's sound system a serious boost on the low end bass notes. This will be best experienced in the bangs, thumps and explosions of movies, or in bass-heavy music.

Auto Volume Leveler

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has an auto volume leveler, whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 do not. More ...

An auto-volume leveler on your TV is a system to automatically adjust the volume on your TV to provide a consistent acceptable volume level across multiple inputs and programs.

An auto-volume leveler system on your TV will stop the volume from accidentally being set too low or too high for a movie or programme, making the sound more even across the board.

Higher RMS Rated Power

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 20 RMS rated power TV. That's 10W higher than the Samsung UN32J4000 (10W) and 14W higher than the Supersonic SC1911 (6W). More ...

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

3D

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is 3D, but the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 are not. More ...

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Wi-Fi

The Sharp LC-60LE831 supports Wi-Fi, but the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 do not. More ...

A Wifi (wireless LAN connection) on your TV means that you can connect your TV directly to your WiFi network.

A wifi connection means that connecting your TV to the net will be easier and can be done without cables.

Ethernet Port

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has an ethernet port, whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 do not have this feature. More ...

An ethernet port lets you connect the TV directly to your router with an ethernet cable.

An ethernet connection is more reliable than wifi and is useful if you do not have a wiki network or the wifi signal is weak. Depending on the speed of your wifi network and ethernet connection may be faster than wifi which means less buffering when streaming content to the TV.

Desktop Stand Included

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has a desktop stand included (as does the Samsung UN32J4000), whereas the Curtis PLDED3273A, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911 do not have this feature. More ...

Whether the TV has a desktop stand included with the purchase.

A desktop stand allows you to mount the TV on a desk or table for easy viewing. Without one, you'll have to either mount the TV on a wall or buy a stand at additional expense.

Two More Awards

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has received 2 awards from expert review sites, but the Curtis PLDED3273A has received no awards, the Samsung UN32J4000 has received no awards, the Sceptre X322BVSR has received no awards and the Supersonic SC1911 has received no awards.

8 Reasons Against for Choosing the Sharp LC-60LE831

Worse Kagoo Score

The Sharp LC-60LE831 has received a Kagoo Score of 83, whereas the Samsung UN32J4000 scored 89, the Sceptre X322BVSR scored 86 and the Supersonic SC1911 scored 86.

More Expensive by $20

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is $20 more expensive than the Sceptre X322BVSR and $5 more expensive than the Supersonic SC1911.

Fewer Sellers

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is only stocked by 1 store, but the Samsung UN32J4000 is stocked by 5 retailers, the Sceptre X322BVSR is stocked by 2 retailers and the Supersonic SC1911 is stocked by 8 sellers. More ...

The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by Over One Year

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is eight months older than the Samsung UN32J4000 and 19 months older than the Sceptre X322BVSR.

Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $68

The running costs over five years of the Sharp LC-60LE831 are $122 which is $57 more than the Sceptre X322BVSR and $68 more than the Supersonic SC1911. Show assumptions.

Overall Review Rating is Considerably Worse

The average overall rating of the Sharp LC-60LE831 is only 79%, whereas the average overall rating of the Curtis PLDED3273A is 85% (based on 869 reviews) and the Samsung UN32J4000 is 91% (based on 197 reviews).

Worse Brand

Sharp TVs have an average rating of only 75.6%, but Samsung has an average rating of 94.7% and Supersonic has an average rating of 83.9%.

Has a Worse Image Quality

On average reviewers thought the Sharp LC-60LE831 has a worse image quality.

The Sharp LC-60LE831 is 1,383mm wide, 839mm tall and 34mm thick.

Sharp LC-60LE831 front view

The cheapest price that we could find for the LC-60LE831 in the US is $110.00 but in total we found only 1 price for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$110.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | $110.00
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Curtis PLDED3273A

$184.99
Overstock

Curtis PLDED3273A

Buy Now
Curtis PLDED3273A
HD
32"
210mm
THICK
60Hz
REFRESH RATE

The Curtis PLDED3273A has a Kagoo Score of 83. However with a price tag of $184.99 this TV is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Curtis PLDED3273A.

Features We Love:
PC in (D-Sub) port

A classic and fully featured 32", 210mm thick TV, with a fair price. Multiple reviews mentioned that this TV has superb picture quality, good sound quality and it's very easy to setup.

95
Reviews
869 Reviews
85
Features
Fully-Featured
84
Value for Money
Very Good
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Our review analysis indicates that Curtis PLDED3273A has great user reviews with an average user rating of 85%, based on 869 reviews.

4 Reasons For for Choosing the Curtis PLDED3273A

Twice As High Typical Contrast Ratio

The Curtis PLDED3273A has a medium (1200:1) typical contrast ratio, however the Supersonic SC1911 only has a low typical contrast ratio. We do not know what type of typical contrast ratio the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 have. More ...

'Contrast Ratio' is a measure of the image contrast that the TV is capable of producing - it is the difference between the brightness of the darkest black and brightest white that the TV can produce. The higher the contrast ratio the better the contrast.

A higher contrast ratio means that the TV can product darker blacks and brighter whites, resulting in better image quality. So a TV with a contrast ratio of 1000:1 can produce whites which are 1000 times brighter than the darkest black that the TV can produce.

50 Cd/m² Brighter Display Brightness

The Curtis PLDED3273A is a 300 display brightness TV. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Supersonic SC1911 (250 Cd/m²). More ...

'Display Brightness' is a measure of how bright the screen on the TV is.

A brighter display means the screen will have a greater capacity for brightness. This can be useful in combating glare from the sun in very bright rooms, or for making the screen visible from further away.

More Reliable

On average reviewers thought the Curtis PLDED3273A was more reliable. Several people thought that it was difficult to damage or scratch, was reliable and well made.

More Carefully Designed

Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Curtis PLDED3273A was more carefully designed. Over 20 people thought that it was really good-looking and several people thought that it was also very well designed and was smooth.

20 Reasons Against for Choosing the Curtis PLDED3273A

Smaller Display Diagonal

The Curtis PLDED3273A is a 32 TV, and so do the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Sceptre X322BVSR. That's 28" smaller than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (60") and 13" larger than the Supersonic SC1911 (19"). More ...

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

A Lot Thicker

The Curtis PLDED3273A is a 210 thick TV, whereas the Samsung UN32J4000 is a 69mm thick TV (141mm thinner), the Sceptre X322BVSR is a 79mm thick TV (131mm thinner), the Sharp LC-60LE831 is a 34mm thick TV (176mm thinner) and the Supersonic SC1911 is a 47.5mm thick TV (162.5mm thinner). More ...

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Slower High Frequency Rate

Curtis PLDED3273A is only 60 refresh rate, and so does the Samsung UN32J4000. That's 40Hz slower than the Sharp LC-60LE831 (100Hz). More ...

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

2.5ms Slower Response Time

The Curtis PLDED3273A has a response time of 8, whereas the Supersonic SC1911 is a 5.5ms response time TV (2.5ms faster). More ...

'Response Time' is the measure of how long it takes an individual pixel to move from active to inactive - therefore how fast it takes the TV to respond to the signal it's receiving and display it on the screen.

Slow response times on a TV mean that signals on fast moving images (such as video games or sports) could clash together, creating blurry images as several slightly different signals attempt to be displayed at once. A TV with faster response times can therefore display fast-moving images sharply and cleanly.

Not 3D

The Curtis PLDED3273A is not 3D (As do the the Samsung UN32J4000, the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Supersonic SC1911), but the Sharp LC-60LE831 is. More ...

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The Curtis PLDED3273A does not support Wi-Fi (As do the the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Supersonic SC1911), but the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 do. More ...

A Wifi (wireless LAN connection) on your TV means that you can connect your TV directly to your WiFi network.

A wifi connection means that connecting your TV to the net will be easier and can be done without cables.

Does Not Have an Ethernet Port

The Curtis PLDED3273A does not have an ethernet port (As do the the Samsung UN32J4000 and the Supersonic SC1911), whereas the Sceptre X322BVSR and the Sharp LC-60LE831 have this feature. More ...

An ethernet port lets you connect the TV directly to your router with an ethernet cable.

An ethernet connection is more reliable than wifi and is useful if you do not have a wiki network or the wifi signal is weak. Depending on the speed of your wifi network and ethernet connection may be faster than wifi which means less buffering when streaming content to the TV.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Curtis PLDED3273A has received a Kagoo Score of 83, but the Samsung UN32J4000 scored 89, the Sceptre X322BVSR scored 86 and the Supersonic SC1911 scored 86.

$95 More Expensive

The Curtis PLDED3273A is more expensive than the Samsung UN32J4000 by $22, more expensive than the Sceptre X322BVSR by $95, more expensive than the Sharp LC-60LE831 by $75 and more expensive than the Supersonic SC1911 by $80.

Not As Many Stockists

Only 1 retailer sell the Curtis PLDED3273A, however 5 shops sell the Samsung UN32J4000, 2 shops sell the Sceptre X322BVSR and 8 stores sell the Supersonic SC1911. More ...

Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over Four Years Older

The Curtis PLDED3273A is older than the Samsung UN32J4000 by four years, older than the Sceptre X322BVSR by four years and older than the Sharp LC-60LE831 by three years.

Lower User Review Score

The Curtis PLDED3273A has an average user rating of 85%, but the Samsung UN32J4000 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 197 reviews).

Lower Overall Review Score

The Curtis PLDED3273A has an average overall rating of 85%, but the Samsung UN32J4000 has an average overall rating of 91% (based on 197 reviews).

Worse Brand

Curtis TVs have an average rating of only 68%, however Samsung has an average rating of 94.7%, Sceptre has an average rating of 73.7%, Sharp has an average rating of 75.6% and Supersonic has an average rating of 83.9%.

Has a Worse Price

On average reviewers thought the Curtis PLDED3273A has a worse price.

A Worse Size

The Curtis PLDED3273A reviewers thought the Curtis PLDED3273A was a worse size.

Harder to Use

On average reviewers thought the Curtis PLDED3273A was harder to use.

Produces Inferior Picture Quality

The Curtis PLDED3273A reviewers thought the Curtis PLDED3273A produces inferior picture quality.

Has Worse Sound Quality

The Curtis PLDED3273A reviewers thought the Curtis PLDED3273A has worse sound quality.

Has a Worse Useful Remote Control

Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Curtis PLDED3273A has a worse useful remote control.

The cheapest price that we could find for the PLDED3273A in the US is $184.99 but in total we found only 1 price for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
$184.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | $184.99
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices
Share on
Compare All TVs
Find the best TV for you by checking our complete list of over 244 TVs.

Signup For Our Free TV Deals Newsletter

1,000s of Deals Coupons Price Drops Free No Spam
Sign Up
Save Password

Select Deal Types That You Are Interested In

Finish
In This Guide
5 Best TVs Under $200 in the US - July 2020
Samsung UN32J4000
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Sceptre X322BVSR
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Supersonic SC1911
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Sharp LC-60LE831
Awards
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Curtis PLDED3273A
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices

Today's Best TV Sales

$2k Price Drop
loading image
$7,000
$4,496.99
77"
46.9mm
THICK
$1k Price Drop
loading image
$3,300
$1,676.99
55"
50.3mm
THICK
$900 Price Drop
loading image
$3,500
$2,599.00
65"
46.9mm
THICK
$1k Price Drop
loading image
$5,499
$3,798.88
65"
3.85mm
THICK

×