LG 32LF561 vs LG 32LF5610

(26)
(26)
LG 32LF561
LG 32LF5610

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Common interface (CI) Edit
The LG 32LF561 has a common interface (CI), however the LG 32LF5610 does not. Read more

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Two RF ports quantitys Edit
The number of RF ports quantitys on the LG 32LF561 is two, but the LG 32LF5610 only has one RF ports quantity. Read more

RF stands for Radio Frequency and an RF port is an older type of input connector for TVs which is most commonly use for connecting cable TV and satellite TV feeds directly to the TV.

Multiple RF ports will allow you to connect multiple RF feeds to the TV at the same time. For example, if the TV has a built in satellite TV decoder then you could connect 2 different satellite dishes to the TV.

Electronic Programme Guide (EPG) Edit
The LG 32LF561 has an electronic Programme Guide (EPG), whereas the LG 32LF5610 does not have an electronic Programme Guide (EPG).
Teletext function Edit
The LG 32LF561 has a teletext function, whereas the LG 32LF5610 does not.
3% cheaper to run
Over five years the LG 32LF561 only costs $45.25 to run but the LG 32LF5610 costs $46.61 to run (3% more). Read more
Energy efficiency rating is better
The LG 32LF561 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the LG 32LF5610 has a rating of "A".
A bit better user reviews
Based on 25 reviews, the average user review score of the LG 32LF561 is 94%, however the average rating of the LG 32LF5610 is 92% (based on 26 reviews).
2 Reasons For
Lighter Edit
LG 32LF5610 is 6kg heavy. That's 200g lighter than the LG 32LF561 (6kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 32LF5610 is "A", whereas the rating of the LG 32LF561 is "A".

Reasons Against

1 Reason Against
Moderately heavier Edit
The LG 32LF561 is a 6.2kg heavy TV, whereas the LG 32LF5610 is a 6kg heavy TV (200g lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

6 Reasons Against
Does not have a common interface (CI) Edit
The LG 32LF5610 does not have a common interface (CI), however the LG 32LF561 has a common interface (CI). Read more

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

One less RF ports quantity Edit
The LG 32LF5610 has one RF ports quantity, however the LG 32LF561 only has two RF ports quantitys. Read more

RF stands for Radio Frequency and an RF port is an older type of input connector for TVs which is most commonly use for connecting cable TV and satellite TV feeds directly to the TV.

Multiple RF ports will allow you to connect multiple RF feeds to the TV at the same time. For example, if the TV has a built in satellite TV decoder then you could connect 2 different satellite dishes to the TV.

Does not have an electronic Programme Guide (EPG) Edit
The LG 32LF5610 does not have an electronic Programme Guide (EPG), whereas the LG 32LF561 has an electronic Programme Guide (EPG).
Does not have a teletext function Edit
The LG 32LF5610 does not have a teletext function, whereas the LG 32LF561 has a teletext function.
More expensive to run over five years by 3%
Over five years the running costs of the LG 32LF5610 are $46.61 which is $1.36 more than the LG 32LF561. Show assumptions.
A little Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the LG 32LF5610 is 92%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 32LF561 is 94% (based on 25 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

23 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 45.25
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 45.25
Electricity cost - switched on $ 45.25
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 46.61

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.3T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.31T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
32" 32"
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
3D
 3D
 3D
High Frequency Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 300Hz
LED Backlighting Type
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
OLED Technology
Unknown - Click to provide data
 OLED technology
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 200Hz
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
Screen Format Adjustments
 16:9
 16:9
Display Diagonal (metric)
80cm 80cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
Tuner Type
 Digital
 Digital
Analog Signal Format System
 Not supported
 Not supported

Smart TV

Smart TV
 Smart TV
 Smart TV
Internet TV
 Internet TV
 Internet TV

Audio

Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Virtual Surround
RMS Rated Power
20W 20W
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2
Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Dolby Technology
 Digital
 Digital
Audio Decoders
 Dolby Digital
 Dolby Digital

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface Plus (CI+)
Common Interface (CI)
 Common interface (CI)
BEST
 Common interface (CI)
RF Ports Quantity
2
BEST
1
SCART Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out
1 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
 DVI port
 DVI port
HDMI Version
 1.4
BEST
 1.4
PC in (D-Sub)
 PC in (D-Sub)
 PC in (D-Sub)
HDMI Ports Quantity
2 2
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN

Management Features

Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
 Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
BEST
 Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)

Performance

Teletext Function
 Teletext function
BEST
 Teletext function
24p Support
Unknown - Click to provide data
 24p support

Design

Colour of Product
 Gold
 Gold

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interfaces
 200 x 200
 200 x 200
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
38W 38W
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
Annual Energy Consumption
55kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 120 - 230
 120 - 230
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50

Weight & Dimensions

Depth
55.5mm 55.5mm
Weight
6.2kg 6kg
BEST
Package Weight
7.4kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
207mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
481mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width (with Stand)
732mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
437mm 437mm
Width
732mm 732mm
Package Height
510mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
816mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Handheld Remote Control
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
Feedback