Share on
LG 65UF7700 vs Sony XBR-65X850

LG 65UF7700 vs Sony XBR-65X850

LG 65UF7700
Sony XBR-65X850

Top Prices

Walmart
Checked 16 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 19 hours ago
Out of stock
Target
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Tech For Less
Checked 1 day ago
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 19 hours ago
In stock
MMK Marketing
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
A little larger display diagonal Edit
The LG 65UF7700 has a display diagonal of 65", but the Sony XBR-65X850 is only a 64.5" TV (0.5" smaller). Read more

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

34% thinner Edit
The LG 65UF7700 has a depth of 58.5mm. That's 19.5mm thinner than the Sony XBR-65X850 (78mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Significantly better user reviews
The average user review score of the LG 65UF7700 is 100%, whereas the average rating of the Sony XBR-65X850 is 80% (based on 1 review).
4 Reasons For
3D Edit
The Sony XBR-65X850 is 3D, but the LG 65UF7700 is not. Read more

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Cheaper by $198
The Sony XBR-65X850 is $198 cheaper than the LG 65UF7700.
14 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Better selling
The Sony XBR-65X850 ranks No. 486 by number of sales, whereas the LG 65UF7700 ranks No. 758232.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Not 3D Edit
The LG 65UF7700 is not 3D, whereas the Sony XBR-65X850 is 3D. Read more

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

More expensive by $198
The LG 65UF7700 is $198 more expensive than the Sony XBR-65X850.
Fewer sellers
The LG 65UF7700 is only stocked by 3 stores, but the Sony XBR-65X850 is stocked by 17 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by one month
The LG 65UF7700 is one month older than the Sony XBR-65X850.
Less popular
The LG 65UF7700 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 758232 by number of sales in our TVs, whereas the Sony XBR-65X850 ranks No. 486.
3 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The Sony XBR-65X850 has a display diagonal of 64.5", but the LG 65UF7700 is a 65" TV (0.5" larger). Read more

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

25% thicker Edit
The Sony XBR-65X850 has a depth of 78mm. That's 19.5mm thicker than the LG 65UF7700 (78mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

User review Rating is significantly Worse
The average user rating of the Sony XBR-65X850 is 80%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 65UF7700 is 100% (based on 1 review).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 328.05
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.39
Total running cost $ 330.44
Purchase price $ 1,299.99
Total cost of ownership $ 1,630.43
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
2.1T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 2.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
54
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
65"
BEST
64.5"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D
 3D
 3D
BEST
3D Type
 Active
 Active
LED Backlighting Type
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 120Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 Motionflow
 Motionflow
Supported Video Mode
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°

Audio

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Auto Volume Leveler
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Auto volume leveler
RMS Rated Power
20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2
Sound Modes
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
Audio Decoders
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby Digital AC3
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Pulse
 Dolby Digital AC3
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Pulse

Smart TV

Screen Mirroring
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Screen mirroring
Smart TV
 Smart TV
 Smart TV
Internet TV
 Internet TV
Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System Version
2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System Installed
 Web OS
 Web OS

Design

LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
Unknown - Click to provide data 261W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50

Certificates

Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) Certified
 Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data

TV Tuner

Tuner Type
 Analog
 Analog

Performance

Parental Controls
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Parental controls
Video Formats Supported
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
Audio Formats Supported
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
Image Formats Supported
 JPG
 JPG
Face Detection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Face detection
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data
Clock Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Clock function

Packaging Content

Desktop Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Desktop stand included
Handheld Remote Control
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
Batteries Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Batteries included
Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide

Ergonomics

On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Networking

Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Ethernet Port
 Ethernet port
 Ethernet port
Miracast
 Miracast
Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi Direct
 Wi-Fi Direct
 Wi-Fi Direct

Management Features

Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture
On/Off Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/Off timer

Weight & Dimensions

Depth
58.5mm
BEST
78mm
Weight
27kg 24.1kg
BEST
Package Weight
35.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
28.3kg 25.5kg
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
279mm 265mm
BEST
Height (with Stand)
909mm 892mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,460mm 1,452.88mm
BEST
Height
846mm 844mm
Width
1,460mm 1,452.88mm
Package Height
1,014mm 943mm
BEST
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 224mm
Package Width
1,564mm 1,553mm
BEST

Ports & Interfaces

Common Interface (CI) Slot
 Common interface (CI) slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
 DVI port
 DVI port
High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP)
PC in (D-Sub) Port
 PC in (D-Sub) port
 PC in (D-Sub) port
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
 Common interface Plus (CI+)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
1 1
RF Port
1 1
RS-232 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
2 3
BEST
HDMI Port
3 4
BEST
Consumer Electronics Control (CEC)
 BRAVIA Sync
 BRAVIA Sync
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
MHL Version
 3.0
 3.0
BEST
Audio (L,R) Out
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 Type-A Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback