5 Best Steam Cleaners in the US - April 2020
What Steam Cleaner to Buy in March 2020?
| Best Buy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shark S3501 | Philips GC35128 | Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G | VAX S86-SF | Hoover STEAMJET | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Our review analysis indicates that this steam cleaner iseasy to damage or scratch. It's a cheap and classic 1,200W upright steam cleaner, with a very good spec. | The highest scoring portable steam cleaner available, with a reasonable price. | A classic and fully featured 1,189W, 3 bar steam pressure steam cleaner, with a reasonable price. Our review analysis indicates that this steam cleaner isvery easy to use and lightweight, and easy to assemble. | A classic and good spec 1,600W, 3 bar steam pressure steam cleaner. Our review analysis indicates that this steam cleaner has a really hot enough steam jet for effective cleaning, it's very easy to use but heavy and bulky. | A fully featured and classic 1,300W, 3.2 bar steam pressure steam cleaner, with a good price. Multiple reviews mentioned that it's very easy to use, well designed and strong, and durable. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Reasons For
More Shops Are Selling it Better Brand |
6 Reasons For
Removable Water Tank Brush Included Better Kagoo Score Nine Months Newer User Reviews Are Better Overall Reviews Are Better |
5 Reasons For
Hard Floor Brush Cheaper by $9 Better Expert Reviews More Fairly Priced A Better Size |
6 Reasons For
Adjustable Steam Brush Included Cleaning Cloth Window Cleaning Nozzle Hard Floor Brush Easier to Use |
2 Reasons For
A Bit Bigger Steam Pressure Bigger Water Capacity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6 Reasons Against
0.25L Smaller Water Capacity Worse Kagoo Score More Expensive by $9 Older by Nine Months Expert Review Rating is Worse User Review Rating is Considerably Worse |
4 Reasons Against
90% Smaller Water Capacity $29 More Expensive Less Retailers Worse Brand |
9 Reasons Against
7% Smaller Steam Pressure A Lot Smaller Water Capacity Worse Kagoo Score Not As Many Stockists Older by 11 Months User Review Rating is Worse Overall Review Rating is Much Worse Worse Brand Harder to Use 3 More Items
|
11 Reasons Against
Smaller Steam Pressure 0.2L Smaller Water Capacity 1.2kg Heavier Worse Kagoo Score Not Currently Available Older by Over Two Years User Review Rating is Worse Overall Review Rating is Worse Worse Brand Has a Worse Price Worse in Terms of Size 5 More Items
|
9 Reasons Against
900g Heavier Worse Kagoo Score $26 More Expensive Not As Many Stockists Over Three Years Older Hugely Lower User Review Score Hugely Lower Overall Review Score Worse Brand Harder to Use 3 More Items
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Details |
Full Details |
Full Details |
Full Details |
Full Details |
Shark S3501
|
$69.99
Overstock
Shark S3501 |
Buy Now |
|
1,200W
|
|
0.45L
CAPACITY
|
|
The Shark S3501 has a Kagoo Score of 84. However with a price tag of $69.99 this steam cleaner is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Shark S3501.
Our review analysis indicates that this steam cleaner iseasy to damage or scratch. It's a cheap and classic 1,200W upright steam cleaner, with a very good spec.
|
89
|
18 Reviews |
|
84
|
Fully-Featured |
|
90
|
Very Popular |
|
84
|
Very Good |
|
84
|
Excellent |
Our review analysis indicates that Shark S3501 has good user reviews but average expert reviews with an average overall rating of 69%, based on 18 reviews.
2 Reasons For for Choosing the Shark S3501
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this steam cleaner.
Shark steam cleaners have an average rating of 95%, whereas Hoover only has an average rating of 60.8%, Philips only has an average rating of 82.8%, Russell Hobbs only has an average rating of 62.6% and VAX only has an average rating of 61.3%.
6 Reasons Against for Choosing the Shark S3501
The Shark S3501 has a water capacity of 0.45, however the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the VAX S86-SF are all 0.5L capacity steam cleaners (0.05L bigger). More ...
The capacity of a steam cleaner measures how much water it can store at once.
The bigger the capacity of your steam cleaner, the longer it can go between refills, meaning a more efficient use of your time.
The Shark S3501 has received a Kagoo Score of 84, however the Philips GC35128 scored 87.
The Shark S3501 is $9 more expensive than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G.
The Shark S3501 is nine months older than the Philips GC35128.
The Shark S3501's average expert score is only 68%, however the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G's is 73% (based on 1 review).
The Shark S3501's average user score is only 71%, however the Philips GC35128's is 90% (based on 14 reviews), the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G's is 81% (based on 89 reviews) and the VAX S86-SF's is 85% (based on 101 reviews).
The cheapest price that we could find for the S3501 in the US is $69.99 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.
 |
|
$69.99
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$89.99
|
Go to Store |
Philips GC35128
|
$89.80
eBay
Philips GC35128 |
Buy Now |
|
1,000W
|
|
0.07L
CAPACITY
|
|
|
|
The Philips GC35128 has a Kagoo Score of 87. However with a price tag of $89.80 this steam cleaner is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Philips GC35128.
The highest scoring portable steam cleaner available, with a reasonable price.
|
96
|
14 Reviews |
|
86
|
Fully-Featured |
|
91
|
Very Popular |
|
83
|
Very Good |
|
87
|
Excellent |
Our review analysis indicates that Philips GC35128 has very good user reviews with 100% of buyers recommending this steam cleaner to others.
6 Reasons For for Choosing the Philips GC35128
The Philips GC35128 has a removable water tank, whereas the Hoover STEAMJET, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G, the Shark S3501 and the VAX S86-SF do not. More ...
'Removable Water Tanks' denotes whether the water tank on the steam cleaner can be easily removed and reinserted whenever necessary.
A removable water tank makes refilling the steam cleaner far easier, and you're less likely to spill water all over the place.
The Philips GC35128 has a brush included (as does the VAX S86-SF), however the Hoover STEAMJET, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the Shark S3501 do not have this feature. More ...
Whether the steam cleaner comes with extra brushes and accessories.
Having extra brushes for your steam cleaner makes it more versatile, and able to tackle a greater amount of cleaning situations.
The Philips GC35128 has received a Kagoo Score of 87, however the Hoover STEAMJET scored only 75, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G scored 78, the Shark S3501 scored 84 and the VAX S86-SF scored only 74.
The Philips GC35128 was released four years later than the Hoover STEAMJET, released 11 months later than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G, released nine months later than the Shark S3501 and released two years later than the VAX S86-SF
Based on 14 user reviews, the average review score of the Philips GC35128 is 90%, however the average rating of the Hoover STEAMJET is 70% (based on 60 reviews), the average rating of the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is 81% (based on 89 reviews), the average rating of the Shark S3501 is 71% (based on 17 reviews) and the average rating of the VAX S86-SF is 85% (based on 101 reviews).
Based on 14 reviews, the average review score of the Philips GC35128 is 90%, however the average rating of the Hoover STEAMJET is 70% (based on 60 reviews), the average rating of the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is 76% (based on 90 reviews), the average rating of the Shark S3501 is 69% (based on 18 reviews) and the average rating of the VAX S86-SF is 85% (based on 101 reviews).
4 Reasons Against for Choosing the Philips GC35128
The Philips GC35128 has a water capacity of 0.07. That's 0.43L smaller than the Hoover STEAMJET, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G, the Shark S3501 and the VAX S86-SF (0.5L). More ...
The capacity of a steam cleaner measures how much water it can store at once.
The bigger the capacity of your steam cleaner, the longer it can go between refills, meaning a more efficient use of your time.
The Philips GC35128 is more expensive than the Hoover STEAMJET by $3, more expensive than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G by $29 and more expensive than the Shark S3501 by $20.
Only 1 retailer sell the Philips GC35128, whereas 2 sellers sell the Shark S3501. More ...
Philips steam cleaners have an average rating of only 82.8%, whereas Shark has an average rating of 95%.
The cheapest price that we could find for the GC35128 in the US is $89.80 but in total we found only 1 price for it.
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$89.80
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$89.85
Standard delivery: $25.00
|
Go to Store |
Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G
|
$60.59
Digital World Bargains
Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G |
Buy Now |
|
1,189W
|
|
3 Bar
STEAM
|
|
0.38L
CAPACITY
|
|
2.3kg
|
|
|
|
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has a Kagoo Score of 78. However with a price tag of $60.59 this steam cleaner is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G.
A classic and fully featured 1,189W, 3 bar steam pressure steam cleaner, with a reasonable price. Our review analysis indicates that this steam cleaner isvery easy to use and lightweight, and easy to assemble.
|
90
|
90 Reviews |
|
81
|
Fully-Featured |
|
78
|
Very Good |
|
78
|
Very Good |
Owners report that Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has good expert reviews and great user reviews with an average overall rating of 76%, based on 90 reviews.
5 Reasons For for Choosing the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has a hard floor brush (as does the VAX S86-SF), however the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128 and the Shark S3501 do not have this feature. More ...
'Hard Floor Brush' denotes whether the steam cleaner comes with a brush specifically designed for cleaning hard floors.
A specialised brush will make cleaning hard floors significantly easier.
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G costs $60.59, whereas the Hoover STEAMJET is $86.78, the Philips GC35128 is $89.80 and the Shark S3501 is $69.99.
Based on 1 review, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has an average expert review score of 73%, but the Shark S3501 has an average rating of 68% (based on 1 review).
Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G was more fairly priced.
On average reviewers thought the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G was a better size. Several people thought that it was really lightweight and wasn't heavy and bulky.
9 Reasons Against for Choosing the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is a 3 steam pressure steam cleaner, and so does the VAX S86-SF. That's 0.2 bar smaller than the Hoover STEAMJET (3.2 Bar). More ...
'Steam Pressure' denotes the maximum steam pressure that the steam cleaner can achieve.
Different surfaces require different steam pressures to clean - very lightly-soiled surfaces may only require a light spraying, whereas caked-on dirt may require a very heavy flow. Therefore a steamer with more powerful pressure capabilities will be able to better tackle nastier stains.
Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is only 0.38 capacity, but the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128, the Shark S3501 and the VAX S86-SF are all 0.5L capacity steam cleaners (0.12L bigger). More ...
The capacity of a steam cleaner measures how much water it can store at once.
The bigger the capacity of your steam cleaner, the longer it can go between refills, meaning a more efficient use of your time.
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has received a Kagoo Score of 78, but the Philips GC35128 scored 87 and the Shark S3501 scored 84.
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is only stocked by 1 retailer, however the Shark S3501 is stocked by 2 sellers. More ...
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is 11 months older than the Philips GC35128 and two months older than the Shark S3501.
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has an average user score of 81%, but the Philips GC35128 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 14 reviews) and the VAX S86-SF has an average user rating of 85% (based on 101 reviews).
The Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G only has an average overall score of 76%, but the Philips GC35128 has an average overall rating of 90% (based on 14 reviews) and the VAX S86-SF has an average overall rating of 85% (based on 101 reviews).
Russell Hobbs steam cleaners have an average rating of only 62.6%, however Philips has an average rating of 82.8% and Shark has an average rating of 95%.
On average reviewers thought the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G was harder to use.
The cheapest price that we could find for the RHSM1001G in the US is $60.59 but in total we found only 1 price for it.
|
|
Store
Dispatched from the United Kingdom
|
$60.59
|
Go to Store |
VAX S86-SF
VAX S86-SF |
Buy Now |
|
1,600W
|
|
3 Bar
STEAM
|
|
0.5L
CAPACITY
|
|
3.5kg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The VAX S86-SF has a Kagoo Score of 74. With a price tag of $0.00 this steam cleaner is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the VAX S86-SF.
A classic and good spec 1,600W, 3 bar steam pressure steam cleaner. Our review analysis indicates that this steam cleaner has a really hot enough steam jet for effective cleaning, it's very easy to use but heavy and bulky.
|
92
|
101 Reviews |
|
79
|
Good Features |
|
74
|
Very Good |
Owners report that VAX S86-SF has very good user reviews with an average user rating of 85%, based on 101 reviews.
6 Reasons For for Choosing the VAX S86-SF
The VAX S86-SF has an adjustable steam, but the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the Shark S3501 do not have this feature. More ...
'Adjustable steam' means that the steam cleaner has the ability to adjust the amount of steam that is produced, from a small spray to a very heavy burst.
Different surfaces require different steam pressures to clean - very lightly-soiled surfaces may only require a light spraying, whereas caked-on dirt may require a very heavy flow. This will also effect the amount of water used, and therefore how long the steamer lasts between refills.
The VAX S86-SF has a brush included, and so does the Philips GC35128, but the Hoover STEAMJET, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the Shark S3501 do not. More ...
Whether the steam cleaner comes with extra brushes and accessories.
Having extra brushes for your steam cleaner makes it more versatile, and able to tackle a greater amount of cleaning situations.
The VAX S86-SF has a cleaning cloth, however the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the Shark S3501 do not. More ...
Whether the steam cleaner comes with a cloth specifically designed for finishing surfaces after cleaning them, wiping them down and giving them a final little polish.
A cleaning cloth will give a nicer final glean to cleaned floors and windows.
The VAX S86-SF has a window cleaning nozzle, whereas the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the Shark S3501 do not have this feature. More ...
'Window Cleaning Nozzle' denotes whether the steam cleaner comes with a nozzle specifically designed for cleaning windows.
A specialised nozzle will make cleaning windows significantly easier.
The VAX S86-SF has a hard floor brush (as does the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G), however the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128 and the Shark S3501 do not have this feature. More ...
'Hard Floor Brush' denotes whether the steam cleaner comes with a brush specifically designed for cleaning hard floors.
A specialised brush will make cleaning hard floors significantly easier.
Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the VAX S86-SF was easier to use. More than 20 people thought that it was really easy to use and four people thought that it was also very easy to assemble.
11 Reasons Against for Choosing the VAX S86-SF
The VAX S86-SF is a 3 steam pressure steam cleaner, and so does the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G. That's 0.2 bar smaller than the Hoover STEAMJET (3.2 Bar). More ...
'Steam Pressure' denotes the maximum steam pressure that the steam cleaner can achieve.
Different surfaces require different steam pressures to clean - very lightly-soiled surfaces may only require a light spraying, whereas caked-on dirt may require a very heavy flow. Therefore a steamer with more powerful pressure capabilities will be able to better tackle nastier stains.
VAX S86-SF is only 0.5 capacity, but the Hoover STEAMJET, the Philips GC35128, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the Shark S3501 are all 0.45L capacity steam cleaners (0.05L smaller). More ...
The capacity of a steam cleaner measures how much water it can store at once.
The bigger the capacity of your steam cleaner, the longer it can go between refills, meaning a more efficient use of your time.
The VAX S86-SF has a weight of 3.5, whereas the Hoover STEAMJET is a 3.2kg steam cleaner (300g lighter) and the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G is a 2.3kg steam cleaner (1.2kg lighter). More ...
'Weight' denotes the weight of the steam cleaner, without accessories attached.
A lighter steam cleaner is advantageous, because it makes it far easier to carry from room to room.
The VAX S86-SF has only received a Kagoo Score of 74, but the Hoover STEAMJET scored 75, the Philips GC35128 scored 87, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G scored 78 and the Shark S3501 scored 84.
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. More ...
The VAX S86-SF is two years older than the Philips GC35128, 16 months older than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and 18 months older than the Shark S3501.
The VAX S86-SF has an average user score of 85%, but the Philips GC35128 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 14 reviews).
The VAX S86-SF has an average overall score of 85%, but the Philips GC35128 has an average overall rating of 90% (based on 14 reviews).
VAX steam cleaners have an average rating of only 61.3%, however Philips has an average rating of 82.8%, Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 62.6% and Shark has an average rating of 95%.
The VAX S86-SF reviewers thought the VAX S86-SF has a worse price.
Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the VAX S86-SF was worse in terms of size.
Hoover STEAMJET
|
$86.78
eBay
Hoover STEAMJET |
Buy Now |
|
1,300W
|
|
3.2 Bar
STEAM
PRESSURE |
|
0.7L
CAPACITY
|
|
3.2kg
|
|
|
The Hoover STEAMJET has a Kagoo Score of 75. However with a price tag of $86.78 this steam cleaner is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Hoover STEAMJET.
A fully featured and classic 1,300W, 3.2 bar steam pressure steam cleaner, with a good price. Multiple reviews mentioned that it's very easy to use, well designed and strong, and durable.
|
87
|
60 Reviews |
|
80
|
Fully-Featured |
|
71
|
Good |
|
75
|
Very Good |
Our review analysis indicates that Hoover STEAMJET has ok user reviews with an average user rating of 70%, based on 60 reviews.
![Hoover Steamjet Handy [Hoover Steamjet Handy SSNH1300 Handheld Steam Cleaner Review]](https://s1.kagoo.co/review/13029075/m/1482874960/hoover-steamjet-handy-hoover-steamjet-handy-ssnh1.jpg)
2 Reasons For for Choosing the Hoover STEAMJET
The Hoover STEAMJET has a steam pressure of 3.2, whereas the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G and the VAX S86-SF are both only 3 Bar steam pressure steam cleaners (0.2 bar smaller). More ...
'Steam Pressure' denotes the maximum steam pressure that the steam cleaner can achieve.
Different surfaces require different steam pressures to clean - very lightly-soiled surfaces may only require a light spraying, whereas caked-on dirt may require a very heavy flow. Therefore a steamer with more powerful pressure capabilities will be able to better tackle nastier stains.
Hoover STEAMJET is 0.7 capacity. That's 0.2L bigger than the Philips GC35128, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G, the Shark S3501 and the VAX S86-SF (0.5L). More ...
The capacity of a steam cleaner measures how much water it can store at once.
The bigger the capacity of your steam cleaner, the longer it can go between refills, meaning a more efficient use of your time.
9 Reasons Against for Choosing the Hoover STEAMJET
The Hoover STEAMJET is a 3.2 steam cleaner. That's 900g heavier than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G (2.3kg) and 300g lighter than the VAX S86-SF (3.5kg). More ...
'Weight' denotes the weight of the steam cleaner, without accessories attached.
A lighter steam cleaner is advantageous, because it makes it far easier to carry from room to room.
The Hoover STEAMJET has only received a Kagoo Score of 75, but the Philips GC35128 scored 87, the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G scored 78 and the Shark S3501 scored 84.
The Hoover STEAMJET is more expensive than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G by $26 and more expensive than the Shark S3501 by $17.
Only 1 store sell the Hoover STEAMJET, however 2 retailers sell the Shark S3501. More ...
The Hoover STEAMJET is older than the Philips GC35128 by four years, older than the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G by three years, older than the Shark S3501 by three years and older than the VAX S86-SF by 17 months.
The Hoover STEAMJET only has an average user rating of 70%, but the Philips GC35128 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 14 reviews), the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has an average user rating of 81% (based on 89 reviews), the Shark S3501 has an average user rating of 71% (based on 17 reviews) and the VAX S86-SF has an average user rating of 85% (based on 101 reviews).
The Hoover STEAMJET only has an average overall rating of 70%, but the Philips GC35128 has an average overall rating of 90% (based on 14 reviews), the Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G has an average overall rating of 76% (based on 90 reviews) and the VAX S86-SF has an average overall rating of 85% (based on 101 reviews).
Hoover steam cleaners have an average rating of only 60.8%, however Philips has an average rating of 82.8%, Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 62.6%, Shark has an average rating of 95% and VAX has an average rating of 61.3%.
On average reviewers thought the Hoover STEAMJET was harder to use.
The cheapest price that we could find for the STEAMJET in the US is $86.78 but in total we found only 1 price for it.
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$86.78
Standard delivery: $64.47
|
Go to Store |
|
Compare All Steam Cleaners
Find the best steam cleaner for you by checking our complete list of over 17 steam cleaners.
|
5 Best Steam Cleaners in the US - April 2020 |
|
Shark S3501 |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
Philips GC35128 |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
Russell Hobbs RHSM1001G |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
VAX S86-SF |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Hoover STEAMJET |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |