5 Best Flatbed Scanners in the US - July 2020
What Flatbed Scanner to Buy in June 2020?
| Best Buy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 | Epson Perfection V800 | HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 | Xerox C405DN | Plustek OpticPro A320L | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A fully featured and award winning flatbed colour scanning scanner, with a cheap price and optical scanning resolution. Multiple reviews mentioned that it's really well designed. | A fully featured and award winning flatbed colour scanning flat-bed scanner, with a good price and optical scanning resolution. Customers report that this flat-bed scanner isgood for scanning film, very easy to use and good for scanning slides. | Multiple reviews mentioned that this flat-bed scanner isexcellent for scanning documents. It's a fully featured and award winning 1200 x 1200 DPI sheetfed / adf flat-bed scanner, with a low price. It has a duplex scanning and an A4 / us lettermm maximum scan size and supports colour scanning. | A fully featured and good value for money 600 x 600 DPI flatbed scanner. It supports colour scanning and has a duplex scanning. | An award winning and fully featured 1600 x 1600 DPI flatbed scanner, with a reasonable price. Multiple reviews mentioned that it has a very good scan quality and it's very good-looking, and easy to setup. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7 Reasons For
24 Deeper Input Colour Depths Better Kagoo Score $101 Cheaper Two More Awards More Customers Recommend It More Reasonably Priced Has a Wider Variety of Uses 1 More Item
|
9 Reasons For
Higher Optical Scanning Resolution Film Scanning 48 Input Colour Depths Better Kagoo Score Much Better Expert Reviews Better User Reviews Better Brand Better PC Mag Review Score Easier to Use 3 More Items
|
3 Reasons For
Duplex Scanning More Shops Are Selling It Four Months Newer |
1 Reason For
Duplex Scanning |
1 Reason For
24 Deeper Input Colour Depths |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8 Reasons Against
Lower Optical Scanning Resolution Not As Many Stockists Over One Year Older Appreciably Lower Expert Review Score Lower User Review Score Worse Brand Worse PC Mag Review Score Harder to Use 2 More Items
|
7 Reasons Against
Does Not Have a Duplex Scanning More Expensive by $845 Not As Many Stockists Older by Over Two Years One Less Award Less Customers Recommend It Has a Narrower Variety of Uses 1 More Item
|
9 Reasons Against
43 Times Lower Optical Scanning Resolution 24 Shallower Input Colour Depths Worse Kagoo Score $101 More Expensive Fewer Awards Appreciably Lower Expert Review Score Lower User Review Score Worse Brand Worse PC Mag Review Score 3 More Items
|
6 Reasons Against
Lower Optical Scanning Resolution Worse Kagoo Score More Expensive by $234 Not As Many Stockists Older by Four Months Worse Brand |
11 Reasons Against
Only 1600 X 1600 DPI DPI Worse Kagoo Score $662 More Expensive Less Retailers Over Four Years Older Fewer Awards Appreciably Lower Expert Review Score Lower User Review Score Worse Brand Worse PC Mag Review Score Has a Worse Price 5 More Items
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | Compare Shortlisted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Details |
Full Details |
Full Details |
Full Details |
Full Details |
Canon CanoScan LiDE 220
|
$55.00
eBay
Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 |
Buy Now |
|
4800 X
4800 DPI |
|
|
|
10ppm
ADF SCAN
|
|
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has a Kagoo Score of 84 and is flatbed. With a price tag of $55.00 this scanner is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 or read our article on whether you should buy a Canon scanner.
A fully featured and award winning flatbed colour scanning scanner, with a cheap price and optical scanning resolution. Multiple reviews mentioned that it's really well designed.
|
93
|
316 Reviews + 2 Awards |
|
85
|
Fully-Featured |
|
80
|
Quite Popular |
|
84
|
Very Good |
|
84
|
Excellent |
Customers report that Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has good expert reviews and great user reviews with 89% of buyers recommending this scanner to others.
7 Reasons For for Choosing the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is a 48 input colour depth scanner (as do the Epson Perfection V800 and the Plustek OpticPro A320L), whereas the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 only has 24 input colour depths. More ...
We do not know the number of input colour depths on the Xerox C405DN. It is possible that it does not have any input colour depths.
input colour depth denotes how many colours are used by the scanner when digitizing and creating the scan of the original document.
The higher the colour depth, the larger the amount of colours that can be used - meaning greater subtlety and richness, leading to a better final image.
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has received a Kagoo Score of 84, but the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 scored 83, the Plustek OpticPro A320L scored 78 and the Xerox C405DN scored 80.
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 costs $55.00, whereas the Epson Perfection V800 is $899.95, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is $156.00, the Plustek OpticPro A320L is $717.00 and the Xerox C405DN is $289.00.
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has received 2 awards, however the Epson Perfection V800 has received 1 award, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has received 1 award, the Plustek OpticPro A320L has received 1 award and the Xerox C405DN has received no awards.
7.9% of 316 customers recommend the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, however only 3.2% of 95 customers recommend the Epson Perfection V800.
Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 was more reasonably priced. Two people thought that it wasn't expensive.
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 reviewers thought the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has a wider variety of uses. Over 10 people thought that it was superb for scanning documents and eight people thought that it was also good for scanning photos.
8 Reasons Against for Choosing the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is 4800 x 4800 DPI DPI, whereas the Epson Perfection V800 is 6400 x 9600 DPI. More ...
'Optical scanning resolution' denotes the detail level of the image produced by the scanner, measured in dots per inch (DPI).
A bigger optical scanning resolution means that the resulting image will be of a higher detail, and will more closely resemble the original document. Low scan resolutions may appear blurry or lacking in small details.
Only 4 stores sells the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, however 5 stores sell the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1. More ...
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is older than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 by 16 months and older than the Xerox C405DN by one year.
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 only has an average expert rating of 77%, but the Epson Perfection V800 has an average expert rating of 90% (based on 4 reviews) and the Plustek OpticPro A320L has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 3 reviews).
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has an average user rating of 83%, but the Epson Perfection V800 has an average user rating of 89% (based on 83 reviews).
Canon scanners have an average rating of only 88.4%, however Epson has an average rating of 94.5%.
PC Mag's review score for the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 was only 80%, however the Epson Perfection V800's rating was 90%.
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 reviewers thought the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 was harder to use.
The cheapest price that we could find for the CanoScan LiDE 220 in the US is $55.00 and in total we found 4 prices for it.
 |
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
+2 more prices
|
$55.00
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$81.05
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$158.00
|
Go to Store | |
| - Show less prices from eBay | ||||
|
|
1 Year Warranty
|
$96.19
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
Store
Dispatched from Canada
|
$179.99
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
Store
|
$384.65
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
Epson Perfection V800
|
$899.95
Pictureline
Epson Perfection V800 |
Buy Now |
|
6400 X
9600 DPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Epson Perfection V800 has a Kagoo Score of 84 and is flatbed. However with a price tag of $899.95 this scanner is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Epson Perfection V800 or read our article on whether you should buy a Epson scanner.
A fully featured and award winning flatbed colour scanning flat-bed scanner, with a good price and optical scanning resolution. Customers report that this flat-bed scanner isgood for scanning film, very easy to use and good for scanning slides.
|
97
|
87 Reviews + 1 Award |
|
85
|
Fully-Featured |
|
80
|
Quite Popular |
|
78
|
Very Good |
|
84
|
Excellent |
Multiple reviews mentioned that Epson Perfection V800 has very good expert reviews and great user reviews with 100% of buyers recommending this scanner to others.
9 Reasons For for Choosing the Epson Perfection V800
The Epson Perfection V800 is 6400 x 9600 DPI DPI, which is 3 times higher optical scanning resolution as the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 (4800 x 4800 DPI), 43 times higher optical scanning resolution as the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 (1200 x 1200 DPI), 24 times higher optical scanning resolution as the Plustek OpticPro A320L (1600 x 1600 DPI) and 171 times higher optical scanning resolution as the Xerox C405DN (600 x 600 DPI). More ...
'Optical scanning resolution' denotes the detail level of the image produced by the scanner, measured in dots per inch (DPI).
A bigger optical scanning resolution means that the resulting image will be of a higher detail, and will more closely resemble the original document. Low scan resolutions may appear blurry or lacking in small details.
The Epson Perfection V800 has a film scanning, whereas the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1, the Plustek OpticPro A320L and the Xerox C405DN do not. More ...
Device made for scanning photographic film directly into a computer without the use of any intermediate printmaking. It provides several benefits over using a flatbed scanner to scan in a print of any size: the photographer has direct control over cropping and aspect ratio from the original, unmolested image on film; and many film scanners have special software or hardware that removes scratches and film grain and improves color reproduction from film.
A film scanning function is very helpful if you still use a film camera, or have old photo negatives and film lying around - you can now digitize them very easily.
The Epson Perfection V800 is a 48 input colour depth scanner, and so do the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 and the Plustek OpticPro A320L, whereas the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 only has 24 input colour depths. More ...
We do not know the number of input colour depths on the Xerox C405DN. It is possible that it does not have any input colour depths.
input colour depth denotes how many colours are used by the scanner when digitizing and creating the scan of the original document.
The higher the colour depth, the larger the amount of colours that can be used - meaning greater subtlety and richness, leading to a better final image.
The Epson Perfection V800 has received a Kagoo Score of 84, but the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 scored 83, the Plustek OpticPro A320L scored 78 and the Xerox C405DN scored 80.
Based on 4 reviews, the Epson Perfection V800 has an average expert review score of 90%, but the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has an average rating of 77% (based on 5 reviews), the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has an average rating of 74% (based on 8 reviews) and the Plustek OpticPro A320L has an average rating of 80% (based on 3 reviews).
Based on 83 reviews, the Epson Perfection V800 has an average user review score of 89%, but the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has an average rating of 83% (based on 311 reviews), the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews) and the Plustek OpticPro A320L has an average rating of 82% (based on 59 reviews).
Epson scanners have an average rating of 94.5%, however Canon only has an average rating of 88.4%, HP only has an average rating of 79.1%, Plustek only has an average rating of 85.4% and Xerox only has an average rating of 84.1%.
The Epson Perfection V800 has a PC Mag review score of 90%, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220's rating was only 80%, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1's rating was only 70% and the Plustek OpticPro A320L's rating was only 60% from the same site.
Our analysis of the Epson Perfection V800 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Epson Perfection V800 was easier to use. Several people thought that it was very easy to use, had good controls and was easy to setup.
7 Reasons Against for Choosing the Epson Perfection V800
The Epson Perfection V800 does not have a duplex scanning, but the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1, the Plustek OpticPro A320L and the Xerox C405DN do. More ...
Duplex scanning denotes whether the scanner has the ability to scan both sides of a sheet of paper at once, rather than just one.
Duplex scanning is very helpful for quick and efficient scanning of books, notes and any kind of double-sided documents.
The Epson Perfection V800 is $845 more expensive than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, $744 more expensive than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1, $183 more expensive than the Plustek OpticPro A320L and $611 more expensive than the Xerox C405DN.
The Epson Perfection V800 is only stocked by 1 retailer, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is stocked by 4 retailers, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is stocked by 5 retailers, the Plustek OpticPro A320L is stocked by 2 shops and the Xerox C405DN is stocked by 2 stores. More ...
The Epson Perfection V800 is 13 months older than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, two years older than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 and two years older than the Xerox C405DN.
The Epson Perfection V800 has only received 1 award, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has received 2 awards.
Only 3.2% of 95 customers recommend the Epson Perfection V800, however 7.9% of 316 customers recommend the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220.
Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Epson Perfection V800 has a narrower variety of uses.
The cheapest price that we could find for the Perfection V800 in the US is $899.95 but in total we found only 1 price for it.
|
|
|
$899.95
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store |
HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1
|
$156.00
eBay
HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 |
Buy Now |
|
1200 X
1200 DPI |
|
|
|
|
|
20ppm
ADF SCAN
|
|
|
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has a Kagoo Score of 83 and is Sheetfed / ADF. With a price tag of $156.00 this scanner is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 or read our article on whether you should buy a HP scanner.
Multiple reviews mentioned that this flat-bed scanner isexcellent for scanning documents. It's a fully featured and award winning 1200 x 1200 DPI sheetfed / adf flat-bed scanner, with a low price. It has a duplex scanning and an A4 / us lettermm maximum scan size and supports colour scanning.
|
91
|
10 Reviews + 1 Award |
|
84
|
Fully-Featured |
|
81
|
Quite Popular |
|
80
|
Very Good |
|
83
|
Excellent |
Customers report that HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has good expert reviews and good user reviews with an average overall rating of 77%.
3 Reasons For for Choosing the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 F1
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has a duplex scanning, and so does the Xerox C405DN, but the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, the Epson Perfection V800 and the Plustek OpticPro A320L do not. More ...
Duplex scanning denotes whether the scanner has the ability to scan both sides of a sheet of paper at once, rather than just one.
Duplex scanning is very helpful for quick and efficient scanning of books, notes and any kind of double-sided documents.
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this scanner and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is 16 months newer than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, two years newer than the Epson Perfection V800, five years newer than the Plustek OpticPro A320L and four months newer than the Xerox C405DN
9 Reasons Against for Choosing the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 F1
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is 1200 x 1200 DPI DPI, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is 4800 x 4800 DPI, the Epson Perfection V800 is 6400 x 9600 DPI and the Plustek OpticPro A320L is 1600 x 1600 DPI. More ...
'Optical scanning resolution' denotes the detail level of the image produced by the scanner, measured in dots per inch (DPI).
A bigger optical scanning resolution means that the resulting image will be of a higher detail, and will more closely resemble the original document. Low scan resolutions may appear blurry or lacking in small details.
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has 24 input colour depths, however the Plustek OpticPro A320L only has 48 input colour depths. More ...
We do not know the number of input colour depths on the Xerox C405DN. It is possible that it does not have any input colour depths.
input colour depth denotes how many colours are used by the scanner when digitizing and creating the scan of the original document.
The higher the colour depth, the larger the amount of colours that can be used - meaning greater subtlety and richness, leading to a better final image.
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has received a Kagoo Score of 83, whereas the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 scored 84 and the Epson Perfection V800 scored 84.
The HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is more expensive than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 by $101.
Whilst the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has received 1 award, the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has received 2 awards.
The average expert rating of the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is only 74%, whereas the average expert rating of the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is 77% (based on 5 reviews), the Epson Perfection V800 is 90% (based on 4 reviews) and the Plustek OpticPro A320L is 80% (based on 3 reviews).
The average user rating of the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is 80%, whereas the average user rating of the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is 83% (based on 311 reviews), the Epson Perfection V800 is 89% (based on 83 reviews) and the Plustek OpticPro A320L is 82% (based on 59 reviews).
HP scanners have an average rating of only 79.1%, but Canon has an average rating of 88.4%, Epson has an average rating of 94.5%, Plustek has an average rating of 85.4% and Xerox has an average rating of 84.1%.
Whilst the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 has received a PC Mag review score of 70%, the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has a score of 80% and the Epson Perfection V800 has a score of 90%.
The cheapest price that we could find for the ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 in the US is $156.00 and in total we found 5 prices for it.
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
+6 more prices
|
$156.00
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$174.02
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$199.00
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$199.99
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$249.00
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$249.99
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
eBay Money Back Guarantee
•
Worldwide Shipping
|
$250.00
|
Go to Store | |
| - Show less prices from eBay | ||||
|
|
Store
|
$219.99
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
In stock
|
$299.00
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
Store
Dispatched from the United Kingdom
|
$299.00
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
Store
Dispatched from Australia
|
$469.80
|
Go to Store | |
Xerox C405DN
|
$289.00
Adorama
Xerox C405DN |
Buy Now |
|
600 X
600 DPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Xerox C405DN has a Kagoo Score of 80 and is flatbed. With a price tag of $289.00 this scanner is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Xerox C405DN or read our article on whether you should buy a Xerox scanner.
A fully featured and good value for money 600 x 600 DPI flatbed scanner. It supports colour scanning and has a duplex scanning.
|
83
|
Fully-Featured |
|
73
|
Quite Popular |
|
77
|
Very Good |
|
80
|
Excellent |
1 Reason For for Choosing the Xerox C405DN
The Xerox C405DN has a duplex scanning (as does the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1), however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220, the Epson Perfection V800 and the Plustek OpticPro A320L do not have this feature. More ...
Duplex scanning denotes whether the scanner has the ability to scan both sides of a sheet of paper at once, rather than just one.
Duplex scanning is very helpful for quick and efficient scanning of books, notes and any kind of double-sided documents.
6 Reasons Against for Choosing the Xerox C405DN
The Xerox C405DN is 600 x 600 DPI DPI, which is 64 times lower optical scanning resolution as the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 (4800 x 4800 DPI), 171 times lower optical scanning resolution as the Epson Perfection V800 (6400 x 9600 DPI), 4 times lower optical scanning resolution as the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 (1200 x 1200 DPI) and 7 times lower optical scanning resolution as the Plustek OpticPro A320L (1600 x 1600 DPI). More ...
'Optical scanning resolution' denotes the detail level of the image produced by the scanner, measured in dots per inch (DPI).
A bigger optical scanning resolution means that the resulting image will be of a higher detail, and will more closely resemble the original document. Low scan resolutions may appear blurry or lacking in small details.
The Xerox C405DN has received a Kagoo Score of 80, but the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 scored 84, the Epson Perfection V800 scored 84 and the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 scored 83.
The Xerox C405DN is $234 more expensive than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 and $133 more expensive than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1.
The Xerox C405DN is only stocked by 2 stores, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is stocked by 4 shops and the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 is stocked by 5 sellers. More ...
The Xerox C405DN is four months older than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1.
Xerox scanners have an average rating of only 84.1%, however Canon has an average rating of 88.4%, Epson has an average rating of 94.5% and Plustek has an average rating of 85.4%.
The cheapest price that we could find for the C405DN in the US is $289.00 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.
|
|
+1 more price
In stock
|
$289.00
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
Out of stock
|
$699.00
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
| - Show less prices from Adorama | ||||
|
|
Store
|
$771.21
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
Plustek OpticPro A320L
|
$717.00
trinityconnectonline
Plustek OpticPro A320L |
Buy Now |
|
1600 X
1600 DPI |
|
|
|
304.8MM MAX
SCAN SIZE |
|
11.2ppm
ADF SCAN
SPEED (B/W, |
|
|
The Plustek OpticPro A320L has a Kagoo Score of 78 and is flatbed. However with a price tag of $717.00 this scanner is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Plustek OpticPro A320L or read our article on whether you should buy a Plustek scanner.
An award winning and fully featured 1600 x 1600 DPI flatbed scanner, with a reasonable price. Multiple reviews mentioned that it has a very good scan quality and it's very good-looking, and easy to setup.
|
92
|
62 Reviews + 1 Award |
|
82
|
Fully-Featured |
|
74
|
Good |
|
78
|
Very Good |
Owners report that Plustek OpticPro A320L has good expert reviews and very good user reviews with an average overall rating of 82%, based on 62 reviews.
1 Reason For for Choosing the Plustek OpticPro A320L
The number of input colour depths on the Plustek OpticPro A320L is 48 (as do the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 and the Epson Perfection V800), but the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 only has 24 input colour depths. More ...
We do not know the number of input colour depths on the Xerox C405DN. It is possible that it does not have any input colour depths.
input colour depth denotes how many colours are used by the scanner when digitizing and creating the scan of the original document.
The higher the colour depth, the larger the amount of colours that can be used - meaning greater subtlety and richness, leading to a better final image.
11 Reasons Against for Choosing the Plustek OpticPro A320L
The Plustek OpticPro A320L is 1600 x 1600 DPI DPI, but the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 is 4800 x 4800 DPI and the Epson Perfection V800 is 6400 x 9600 DPI. More ...
'Optical scanning resolution' denotes the detail level of the image produced by the scanner, measured in dots per inch (DPI).
A bigger optical scanning resolution means that the resulting image will be of a higher detail, and will more closely resemble the original document. Low scan resolutions may appear blurry or lacking in small details.
The Plustek OpticPro A320L has received a Kagoo Score of 78, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 scored 84, the Epson Perfection V800 scored 84, the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 scored 83 and the Xerox C405DN scored 80.
The Plustek OpticPro A320L is more expensive than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 by $662, more expensive than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 by $561 and more expensive than the Xerox C405DN by $428.
Only 2 sellers sells the Plustek OpticPro A320L, whereas 4 stores sell the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 and 5 stores sell the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1. More ...
The Plustek OpticPro A320L is older than the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 by three years, older than the Epson Perfection V800 by two years, older than the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 by five years and older than the Xerox C405DN by four years.
Whilst the Plustek OpticPro A320L has received 1 award, the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 has received 2 awards.
The Plustek OpticPro A320L's average expert rating is 80%, however the Epson Perfection V800's is 90% (based on 4 reviews).
The Plustek OpticPro A320L's average user rating is 82%, however the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220's is 83% (based on 311 reviews) and the Epson Perfection V800's is 89% (based on 83 reviews).
Plustek scanners have an average rating of only 85.4%, whereas Canon has an average rating of 88.4% and Epson has an average rating of 94.5%.
The Plustek OpticPro A320L has only received a PC Mag review score of 60% , whereas the rating of the Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 was 80%, the rating of the Epson Perfection V800 was 90% and the rating of the HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 was 70%.
The Plustek OpticPro A320L reviewers thought the Plustek OpticPro A320L has a worse price.
The cheapest price that we could find for the OpticPro A320L in the US is $717.00 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.
|
|
Out of stock
|
$599.00
Delivery unknown
|
Go to Store | |
|
|
Store
Dispatched from Australia
|
$717.00
|
Go to Store |
|
Compare All Flatbed Scanners
Find the best flatbed scanner for you by checking our complete list of all flatbed scanners
|
Latest From the Kagoo Blog
Signup For Our Free Scanner Deals Newsletter
5 Best Flatbed Scanners in the US - July 2020 |
|
Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 |
|
Awards |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
Epson Perfection V800 |
|
Awards |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
HP ScanJet Pro 2500 f1 |
|
Awards |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
Xerox C405DN |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
|
Plustek OpticPro A320L |
|
Awards |
|
Reasons For |
|
Reasons Against |
|
Best Prices |
Today's Best Scanner Sales
|
600 X
600 DPI |
|
|
|
|
105ppm
ADF SCAN
SPEED (B/W, |
|
|
|
|
|
600 X
600 DPI |
|
|
|
|
75ppm
ADF SCAN
|
|
|
|
|
