Close
Share on
Samsung S22D300NY
Samsung S22D300
29 Images + 1 Video

Loading image...

Samsung S22D300NY PC Monitor

$149.99
21.5" 1920 X 1080 LED 511.6mm Nov 2014
B
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Display Width Release Date $45.45 Electricity cost over 5 years
Owner reviews are average
Good value for money
Does not have good picture quality
73 Reviews
Factory Outlet Store $171.95 Go to Store
Monoprice.com $149.99 Go to Store
MP3SuperStore $172.99 Go to Store
See All 3 Prices from 3 Stores | $149.99 - $172.99 | Price Trend | Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Reviews

Owner Reviews Are Average

Based on 73 owner reviews this medium monitor has an average owner rating of 78%. Over 71% of reviewers gave this PC display either 4 or 5 stars and 100% of those asked said they would recommend buying it to others.

Samsung Flatpanel Monitors Have Good Reviews

We checked 5,538 user and expert reviews (including 752 verified purchases) for Samsung PC screens and found that on average Samsung has good ratings. We also found that Samsung has good ratings specifically within its medium monitors range. 93% of those that bought a Samsung LCD screen would recommend the product that they bought to other buyers.


Design

Well Designed

Three owners wrote that this PC monitor was good looking. Mr. R. Cockcroft said on Amazon “Looks modern and stylish and does what its supposed to!”. Mrs E. Scott wrote “Excellent product and looks very stylish” and gave it a score of 8 stars.

Two customers reckoned that the Samsung S22D300 was well designed. Newegg.com wrote “Good resolution, acceptable size for graphic design, decent color (once calibrated” in their Samsung S22D300 review yet they gave it a rating of 15.2 out of 100. D T Barton wrote “Nice design & good quality for the price” in their review of this PC monitor.

Read more Less

Good Product Quality

Eight owners concluded that it was good quality. Shaoyang Liu said “Good monitor with good quality” in their review of this PC monitor and rated this PC monitor 8 stars. Patrick Thurston he wrote “Very good quality very easy to work” in his Samsung S22D300 review. Cade B. wrote on Newegg.com “If you can get past the wierd quality it's fine for browsing the internet” and scored it 6 stars.

Robust

One customer considered that the product was well made. Jj Bernard said “Bottom line; it's cheap, reasonably well made” .

Easy to Use

One customer who purchased this PC monitor reckoned that it was easy to assemble. A.b.stafford. rated the product 8 stars and wrote “Easy to put together and a very good clear picture” in their review of the Samsung S22D300. One customer who purchased it said that it was easy to setup. Livilion said “Great value for money and very easy to set up”.


Weight & Dimensions

Lightweight

One owner who purchased the product reckoned that it was lightweight. Two years ago Newegg.com said “Really lightweight compared to what I'm used to” although they gave it a score of 15.2 out of 100.


Certificates

Has an Energy Star Certified

The S22D300 has an Energy Star certified. Most of the other PC displays of this type and age also have an Energy Star certified.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Display

Quite Fast Response Time

The fastest response time of flatpanel monitors of this spec and age is 1ms, the slowest is 40ms, and the average response time is 6.1ms. The Samsung S22D300 has a fairly fast response time (only 5 milliseconds) compared to most of the other medium monitors that were released more than two years ago.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Viewing Angle, Vertical

When compared to other medium monitors that were launched around the same time as this flatpanel monitor, the Samsung S22D300's viewing angle, vertical of only 65 degrees is one of the narrowest. The viewing angles, vertical of medium monitors that have been available for a comparable time to this PC monitor range from 10° to 180°.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Viewing Angle, Horizontal

When compared to other medium monitors that were launched around the same time as this PC display, the viewing angle, horizontal of the Samsung S22D300 of only 90 degrees is one of the narrowest. The average viewing angle, horizontal of comparable spec LCD screens that came out around the same time as this flatpanel monitor is 170°, and the viewing angles, horizontal range from 18° to 1,800°.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This LCD screen has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is the most commonly found display resolution on PC displays of a comparable age and type to it.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Have Good Picture Quality

Two people said in their reviews that it did not have good picture quality. Newegg.com wrote two years ago “Poor picture quality” in their review of this PC monitor. P J Lewis said “Experienced difficulty in setting up picture quality”.

One customer who bought the Samsung S22D300 reckoned that it did not have a wide viewing angle. Newegg.com wrote “Poor viewing angle, lightdark become inverted at more than 30 degrees off”.

One customer who reviewed it mentioned that it did not have a good contrast ratio. Newegg.com mentioned in their review of this PC monitor “Only a 600 1 contrast ratio, which is horribly noticeable compared to higher contrast monitors” .

Read more Less

Smart TV

Poor Connectivity

One person reckoned that it was not good in terms of connectivity. Strawberryjam wrote in their Samsung S22D300 review on Amazon “Many connectivity issues”.


Support

Poor Technical Guidance

One customer thought it did not have good technical guidance. Anthony Z. wrote in his review of the Samsung S22D300 “The contrast and picture control settings via menu barely help the picture if do anything at all” .


Multimedia

Does Not Have a Built-In Speaker(s)

The S22D300 does not have a built-in speaker(s). Most of the other medium monitors that have been available for more than two years do have a built-in speaker(s).

It is worth also looking at alternative flatpanel monitors which also have a built-in speaker(s) including the E2370SD, or the M2470SWH both from AOC or the Viewsonic VX2252 ($115.53).

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Price

Price Has Gone Up by $69.99 (47%)

There was a cheaper price of $80 on eBay 31 days ago.Our unique forecasting algorithm looks at historic price trends and predicts the most likely price change over the next 2 weeks. There is a 55% chance that the price will go back down. However the future is never certain and there remains a 45% chance that the price will actually go up further. Sign up to price alerts to be notified when the price goes back down.

Chart Hide Chart

Other

Released Over Two Years Ago

It was April 2017 when this medium monitor was released.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers samsung ls22d300hyzc001, samsung ls22d300hyyza, samsung s22d300hy055, samsung ls22d300hyza, samsung ls22d300nyxu, samsung 1920x1080, samsung s22d300ny
Barcodes 00011411211701, 00012300422253, 00012301570014, 00016971811859, 0008.87277E+11, 00723856140491, 00801940118158, 00803982985583, 00809394268719, 00887276686325, 00887276688046, 05052916367666, 05054484610236, 05054533610231, 07426601266271, 07426601639648, 07426900373342, 08806085995116, 08806086222457, 08806086223157, 08806086602044

Other PC Monitors to Consider

DELL P2014H vs Samsung S22D300

DELL P2014H vs Samsung S22D300
DELL P2014H Samsung S22D300
$ 70.00 $149.99
$80 Cheaper
User Reviews Are a Lot Better
Twice the Typical Contrast Ratio
Wider Vertical Viewing Angle
Only HD Ready HD Type
Lower Resolution

LG 19MB35 vs Samsung S22D300

LG 19MB35 vs Samsung S22D300
LG 19MB35 Samsung S22D300
$ 295.00 $149.99
Twice the Typical Contrast Ratio
64% Wider Vertical Viewing Angle
A Lot Wider Horizontal Viewing Angle
102.6mm Narrower
$145 More Expensive
Only HD Ready HD Type

Philips 19S4 vs Samsung S22D300

Philips 19S4 vs Samsung S22D300
Philips 19S4 Samsung S22D300
$ 132.99 $149.99
$17 Cheaper
0.2W Lower Power Consumption When Off
95° Wider Vertical Viewing Angle
$10.71 Cheaper to Run
Older by Over One Year
Vastly Higher Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Feedback