Close

Loading image...
Philips 298X4QJAB/27

Philips 298X4QJAB/27 PC Monitor

ua.gecid.com Tested
29" 20000000:1 LCD Mar 2013
Display Diagonal Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Built-In Speaker(s) Release Date
This Philips UltraWide 29" display will amaze you with its Crystal clear 2560x1080 images and brilliant colours. Its fascinating 21:9 AH-IPS screen with Ultra-Narrow Bezel gives you a panoramic... More
$41.01 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Prices will go up $10
within 2 weeks. 82% confidence. Chart
Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
PC Rush
Philips 298X4QJAB/27 from PC Rush
$326.79
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Go to Store
Overstock
Philips 298X4QJAB/27 from Overstock
$328.99
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Report an incorrect price Found it cheaper elsewhere?
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

15 Reasons For

Two Industry Awards

This flatpanel monitor received an "Editor's Choice" from Hdblog.it who said that this PC screen was exceptional.

Ua.gecid.com gave this flatpanel monitor a "Tested" award.

Good Expert Reviews

Based on four expert reviews from sites including Techradar, winmagpro.nl, micromart.co.uk and techradar.com/au/ this PC screen has an average expert rating of 81 out of 100.

User Reviews Are Excellent

On average, based on 7 user reviews this flatpanel monitor has an overall user rating of 90 out of 100.

Easy to Use

One person said in their reviews that it had a good experience. Jinyu said on Amazon “Very pleasant shopping experience” in their Philips 298X4QJAB review.

Good Technical Features

One customer mentioned in their reviews that it had good features. Caterham said in their review on Amazon “Great screen def with good features”.

Philips Has Good Reviews for Its PC Displays

Philips is one of the better rated PC screen manufacturers according to average expert and user reviews, and Philips also has good reviews for its medium monitors.

Chart

Has a Built-In Speaker

The 298X4QJAB has a built-in speaker, unlike most of the other medium monitors that were released more than two years ago which do not have a built-in speaker.

We think you might also be interested in some of the alternative PC monitors with a built-in speaker currently available including the D2769[pl_1563236_price], or the q2963Pm[pl_1533334_price] both from AOC or the LG 27MP75[plb_2194309_price] which has better reviews.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Fairly Wide Vertical Viewing Angle

The vertical viewing angles of medium monitors that have been available for a comparable time to the 298X4QJAB range from 50° to 180°. The Philips 298X4QJAB has a fairly wide vertical viewing angle (178 degrees) compared to most of the other PC monitors of this spec and age.

Chart Edit

Fairly Wide Horizontal Viewing Angle

PC screens of this age and type have horizontal viewing angles of between 60° and 1,800°. The 298X4QJAB has a fairly wide horizontal viewing angle (178 degrees) compared to most of the other medium monitors that are a similar age to the 298X4QJAB.

Chart Edit

Two HDMI Ports

Most LCD screens that have been around for around the same time as the 298X4QJAB have between one and three HDMI ports, including the 298X4QJAB which has two HDMI ports.

Chart Edit

Quite Big Viewable Width

With a viewable width of 672.76 millimeters, the Philips 298X4QJAB has one of the bigger viewable widths amongst comparable spec PC displays of this age. Across all the medium monitors that are a similar age to the 298X4QJAB the viewable widths range from 1mm to 880mm, and the average viewable width is 520mm.

Chart Edit

Fairly Big Display Diagonal

At 73 centimeters, the 298X4QJAB has a fairly big display diagonal compared to most of the other PC monitors that have been available for a comparable time to the 298X4QJAB. The average display diagonal of LCD screens of a comparable spec and age to the 298X4QJAB is 65cm, and the screen sizes range from 28cm to 770cm.

Chart Edit

Fairly Bright Display Brightness

With a display brightness of 300 candellas per square meter, the Philips 298X4QJAB has a quite bright display brightness compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been around for around the same time as the 298X4QJAB. The display brightness of medium monitors that are a similar age to the 298X4QJAB range from 30 cd/m² to 1,700 cd/m².

Chart Edit

2560 X 1080 Graphics Resolution

The 298X4QJAB has a maximum resolution of 2560 x 1080. That's 33% more resolution than a 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) flatpanel monitor, which is the most frequently found resolution. The best resolution of all PC displays of this age and spec is 3840 x 2160 and the worst is 640 x 350.

Chart Edit

Short

The heights of PC monitors that have been around for a comparable time to the 298X4QJAB range from 41mm to 4,800mm. The Philips 298X4QJAB is quite short (only 330 millimeters) compared to most of the other medium monitors that were released more than two years ago.

Chart Edit

9 Reasons Against

Not Good in Terms of Size

One Philips 298X4QJAB reviewer thought it was not thick. Techradar.com mentioned in their Philips 298X4QJAB review on expert website Techradar “A thick alphanumeric naming soup is unfortunately par for the course for PC monitors”.

Not 3D Compatible

The 298X4QJAB is not 3D compatible, although keep in mind that most of the other comparable spec PC displays that have been on the market for more than two years are also not 3D compatible.

If you want a flatpanel monitor that is 3D compatible then you might want to look at the Asus VG23AH[plb_1411330_price], the AOC d2757Ph[plb_1515695_price], or the Benq XL2411T[plb_1522088_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

The 298X4QJAB does not have a built-in camera. Most of the other medium monitors that were released more than two years ago also do not have a built-in camera.

It is worth also looking at alternative PC displays which also have a built-in camera including the 241P4QPY[pl_1398366_price], or the 231C5[pl_1599727_price] both from Philips or the Asus MK241[plb_2332619_price] which is also higher rated.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Integrated Card Reader

Most medium monitors that have been on the market for a similar time to the 298X4QJAB do not have an integrated card reader. The Philips 298X4QJAB is no exception to this as it too does not have an integrated card reader.

There are a number of alternative PC displays which also have an integrated card reader that you might also want to consider including the U2413[pl_1565290_price], the U2713H[pl_1518815_price], or the UP2414Q[pl_2251567_price] all from DELL which is also higher rated.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Only HD HD Type

This PC display has a Full HD HD type, which is typical of many medium monitors that have been on the market for a similar time to it.

Chart Edit

Quite Small Viewable Height

At only 283.82 millimeters, the 298X4QJAB has a fairly small viewable height compared to most of the other flatpanel monitors of a similar age and type to the 298X4QJAB. The average viewable height of PC screens of a similar type and age to the 298X4QJAB is 310mm.

Chart Edit

Heavy

The 298X4QJAB is one of the heavier PC monitors of this type and age (5.7 kilograms) amongst comparable spec PC monitors of this age. Medium monitors that were released around the same time as the 298X4QJAB have weights of between 3g and 39kg, and the average weight is 4.9kg.

Chart Edit

Fairly High Power Consumption When Active

At 33.3 Watts, the Philips 298X4QJAB has a quite high power consumption when active compared to most of the other PC monitors of this age and type. Across all the LCD screens of a comparable spec and age to the 298X4QJAB the power consumptions when active range from 9W to 63W, and the average power consumption when active is 22W.

Chart Edit

Fairly Slow Response Time

The fastest response time of PC displays of a comparable age and spec to the 298X4QJAB is 1ms and the slowest is 40ms. The 298X4QJAB has one of the slower response times (14 milliseconds) amongst comparable spec LCD screens of this age.

Chart Edit

2 Other reasons to consider the Philips 298X4QJAB/27

Released Over Three Years Ago

This LCD screen was released over three years ago.

LCD Display Type

The 298X4QJAB has an LCD display type which is better than the LED display type found on most flatpanel monitors of a similar type and age to it.

Alternative flatpanel monitors that have an LCD Display currently available which you might want to look at include the Eizo Foris FG2421[plb_2035593_price] which has better reviews.

If the display type of this PC screen is too bad for you then you might want to look at the AOC u3477[plb_2367536_price] (LED) which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Display Diagonal
Display Resolution
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
Display
3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
Backlight Type
HD Type
HDCP
Display SRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Viewable Size, Vertical
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Aspect Ratio
Vertical Scan Range
Horizontal Scan Range
Pixel Pitch
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Contrast Ratio (typical)
Display Diagonal (metric)
Display Technology
Display Brightness
Response Time
SmartResponse
Native Aspect Ratio
Display Number of Colours
Ports & Interfaces
PC Audio in
Headphone Outputs
Audio Output
Audio Input
DisplayPorts Quantity
HDMI Ports Quantity
DVI-D Ports Quantity
DVI Port
Multimedia
Built-In Speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
RMS Rated Power
Number of Loudspeakers
TV Tuner Integrated
Design
Feet Colour
Colour of Product
Heavy Metals Free
Performance
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Thin Client
Thin Client Installed
Networking
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Ergonomics
Picture-in-Picture
Tilt Angle
Tilt Adjustment
VESA Mounting Interfaces
VESA Mounting
Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Power LED
On/off Switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
Number of OSD Languages
On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Power
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
AC Input Frequency
AC Input Voltage
Operational Conditions
Relative Humidity
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Certificates
Certification
Compliance Industry Standards
Energy Star Certified
EPEAT Compliance
Weight & Dimensions
Weight (with Stand) (imperial)
Package Weight
Package Height
Package Depth
Package Width
Weight With Stand
Height (with Stand)
Depth (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Weight
Height
Depth
Width
Other Features
Package Dimensions (W X D X H)
Power Consumption (active)
Effective Viewing Area
Display Viewable Area (HxV)
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
Dimensions (W X D X H) With Stand

1 Award

ua.gecid.com Tested

Expert Reviews

10 October 2014

???????? ? ??????? ?????????? ???? ? ?????????? ? ????????? ?????, ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????????? ???????????? ? ???????? 24-????????? ?????????. ??????? ?????? ???????, ??? ???????? ????,...

Ua.gecid.com

21 9 aspect ratio good for films
Good image quality
Beeldverhouding ideaal voor multitaske
Beeldkwalitei
Kan dual-screen-setup vervangen
Not practical for general PC use
Other panels offer better quality
80 AdobeRGB is mager voor grafisch wer
Plaatsing knoppen
HDMI

User Reviews

(1)
Reviewed 18 September 2014 by Shirley T.
(Verified Purchase)

Ok if you are a mac use. to get the 2560x1080 use the display part. but you have to buy that cable Cable Matters Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort (Thunderbolt? Port Compatible didn't find it at on new... Read more…

Good Price for the 29 ultra wide monitor
Bright Colors are great
Has speakers which are pretty good if limited to space on deck
Cheaper then the 29 in LG I have looks almost the same
NO MAC SOFTWARE TO SPLIT SCREENS (LG HAS IT
So to do that you have to buy it from apps store or use the free one
All black but I knew that when I got it , just needs a pretty frame in silver would've been nice
Also would've been nice if they would've put the right cables mini display port one and not the HDMI as the mac reads it as a TV NOT PRETTY THEN

Brochures and Manuals

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on $39.76
Electricity cost when on standby $1.36
@ $0.103579866 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price $per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ $0.00147852888 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price $per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years $41.12
Running costs for this PC monitor have been estimated based on other similar PC monitors. If you know how much electricity and water the Philips 298X4QJAB/27uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 8 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers 298x4qjab, 298x4qjab27, 298x4qjab00, 298x4qjab93
Barcodes 00012303196649, 00025184154622, 00132017756714, 00609585229518, 00661686770696, 00712581661786, 05052916669913, 05054484244653, 06095852295180, 06951613902738, 08712581661786

See How Other PC Monitors Compare to the Philips 298X4QJAB/27

DELL U2913WM vs Philips 298X4QJAB/27

DELL U2913WM vs Philips 298X4QJAB/27
DELL U2913WM Philips 298X4QJAB/27
$ 246.99 $326.79
$80 Cheaper
Narrower Width With Stand
Four More Awards
A Bit Better Expert Reviews
One Less HDMI Port
User Review Rating is a Bit Worse

Benq BL3200 vs Philips 298X4QJAB/27

Benq BL3200 vs Philips 298X4QJAB/27
Benq BL3200 Philips 298X4QJAB/27
$ 398.99 $326.79
Significantly Faster Response Time
Five More Awards
99% More Display Colour Count
Expert Reviews Are a Lot Better
$72 More Expensive
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 187%

AOC q2963Pm vs Philips 298X4QJAB/27

AOC q2963Pm vs Philips 298X4QJAB/27
AOC q2963Pm Philips 298X4QJAB/27
$ 424.95 $326.79
Eighteen More Awards
Faster Response Time
Two DisplayPorts
Moderately Bigger Viewable Height
$98 More Expensive
One Less HDMI Port
Feedback