Close

Loading image...
Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00
2 Images

Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00 PC Monitor

SweClockers.com Good Product
27" 20000000:1 LCD Feb 2013
Display Diagonal Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Built-In Speaker(s) Release Date
This Philips 27 display will amaze you with its Crystalclear Quad HD 2560x1440 images and brilliant colors. MultiView allows active dual connect and view. Its 2mp webcam enables you to socialize. More
$47.06 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

12 Reasons For

Three Industry Awards

The writers at Techsweden.org and Gagadget.com both said that concluded that they would recommend this medium monitor and gave it their "Recommended" award.

This flatpanel monitor received a "Good Product" award from SweClockers.com.

Expert Reviews Are Average

This PC screen has an average expert rating of 70 out of 100 based on four expert reviews from sites including macworld.co.uk, prad.de, Techsweden.org and micromart.co.uk.

Nice Design

One Philips 272C4QPJKAB owner reckoned that it was a good design. Expert review site Micromart.co.uk said three years ago “Having recently reviewed the Philips 298X4QJAB ultra-widescreen, I was very curious to see a more normal aspect ratio design that exceeded the norm of 1080p resolution”.

Good Technical Features

One Philips 272C4QPJKAB reviewer concluded that this PC monitor had good features. Micromart.co.uk said “The Philips Brilliance MultiView 272C4QPJKAB has many features in common with that ult” in their review and gave the Philips 272C4QPJKAB a rating of 4 stars.

Philips Has Good Reviews for Its LCD Screens

Medium monitors produced by Philips have good reviews on average compared to other manufacturers. We also checked the reviews for all PC displays (not just medium monitors) and found that Philips also has good reviews across its entire range.

Has a Built-In Camera

The 272C4QPJKAB has a built-in camera, which is unusual. Most of the other medium monitors that have been available for more than two years do not have a built-in camera.

We think you might also be interested in alternative PC monitors which also have a built-in camera including the AOC I2472[plb_2126699_price].

Read more Less Chart Edit

Has a Built-In Speaker

The Philips 272C4QPJKAB has a built-in speaker, which is unusual. Most of the other medium monitors that have been available for more than two years do not have a built-in speaker.

We compared all the other flatpanel monitors with a built-in speaker to this PC monitor and we think because of it's better review score, the AOC I2460[plb_2045326_price], and the Benq GW2765HT[plb_3034210_price] is also worth considering.

We compared all the other flatpanel monitors which also have a built-in speaker to this PC display and we think the Viewsonic VG2438[plb_2457343_price] is also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Fairly Wide Vertical Viewing Angle

With a vertical viewing angle of 178 degrees, the Philips 272C4QPJKAB has a fairly wide vertical viewing angle compared to most of the other flatpanel monitors of a comparable age and type to the 272C4QPJKAB. Across all the flatpanel monitors of a comparable spec and age to the 272C4QPJKAB the vertical viewing angles range from 50° to 180°, and the average vertical viewing angle is 170°.

Chart Edit

Two HDMI Ports

The Philips 272C4QPJKAB is a two HDMI port LCD screen. Most of the other medium monitors that have been around for more than two years have between one and three HDMI ports.

Chart Edit

Fairly Big Display Diagonal

Flatpanel monitors that are a similar age to the 272C4QPJKAB have screen sizes of between 28cm and 770cm. The 272C4QPJKAB has one of the bigger screen sizes (68.58 centimeters) amongst PC screens of this age.

Chart Edit

Quite Bright Display Brightness

The display brightness of medium monitors that have been on the market for a comparable time to the 272C4QPJKAB range from 30 cd/m² to 1,700 cd/m². The 272C4QPJKAB has one of the brighter display brightness (300 candellas per square meter) amongst comparable spec PC screens of this age.

Chart Edit

Fairly Big Viewable Width

The 272C4QPJKAB has a fairly big viewable width (596.74 millimeters) compared to most of the other similar spec PC screens that came out around the same time as the 272C4QPJKAB. Across all the similar spec PC screens that were released more than two years ago the viewable widths range from 1mm to 880mm.

Chart Edit

8 Reasons Against

Not Good in Terms of Size

One Philips 272C4QPJKAB owner who reviewed the product considered that it was not heavy and bulky. Expert website Macworld.co.uk wrote in their review “There’s a slightly chunky beve” .

Not 3D Compatible

The 272C4QPJKAB is not 3D compatible. Most of the other PC monitors of this age and type are also not 3D compatible.

PC displays which are 3D compatible that might be worth looking at include the XL2420[pl_1453626_price], or the XL2411[pl_2130532_price] both from Benq or the Asus VG248QE[plb_1529549_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Integrated Card Reader

Like most of the other PC monitors of a similar spec and age to the 272C4QPJKAB, the Philips 272C4QPJKAB does not have an integrated card reader.

Chart Edit

Very Short Mean Time Between Failures

At only 30 hours, the 272C4QPJKAB has a quite short mean time between failures compared to most of the other LCD screens that were launched more than two years ago. Medium monitors that were released more than two years ago have mean time between failures of between 30h and 70,000h.

Chart Edit

Only HD HD Type

This LCD screen has a Wide Quad HD HD type, which is the most commonly found HD type on flatpanel monitors of a comparable spec and age to it.

Chart Edit

Fairly Slow SmartResponse

The fastest smartResponse of medium monitors that are a comparable age to the 272C4QPJKAB is 1ms and the slowest is 7ms. At 6 milliseconds, the 272C4QPJKAB has a quite slow smartResponse compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been on the market for around the same time as the 272C4QPJKAB.

Chart Edit

Quite High Power Consumption When Active

Similar spec PC displays that came out around the same time as the 272C4QPJKAB have power consumptions when active of between 9W and 63W, and the average power consumption when active is 22W. With a power consumption when active of 38 Watts, the 272C4QPJKAB has a fairly high power consumption when active compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been around for around the same time as the 272C4QPJKAB.

Chart Edit

Quite Slow Response Time

At 12 milliseconds, the Philips 272C4QPJKAB has a quite slow response time compared to most of the other comparable spec PC screens that are a similar age to the 272C4QPJKAB. Comparable spec PC displays that were released more than two years ago have response times of between 1ms and 40ms.

Chart Edit

2 Other reasons to consider the Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00

Released Over Three Years Ago

This PC display has been on the market for over three years.

LCD Display Type

The 272C4QPJKAB has a better display type than most PC screens of a comparable age and spec to it. This PC screen has an LCD display type, whereas most similar spec LCD screens that have been available for around the same time as it have an LED display type.

It may also be worth considering one of the alternative LCD screens that have an LCD Display currently available including the iiyama XB2485WSU[plb_1448731_price], or the Philips 240S4[plb_1482821_price] which has better reviews; or the Philips 273E3[plb_1479583_price] which is cheaper.

If the display type of this PC display is too bad for you then you might also want to consider the Benq GW2750[plb_2446079_price] (LED and cheaper) or the iiyama XB2780HSU[plb_1370714_price] (LED and higher rated), or the Eizo Flexscan EV2336W[plb_1716850_price] (LED and higher rated).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Display Diagonal
Display Resolution
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
Display
3D
Backlight Type
HD Type
HDCP
Display SRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Viewable Size, Vertical
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Aspect Ratio
Pixel Pitch
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Contrast Ratio (typical)
Display Diagonal (metric)
Display Technology
Display Brightness
Response Time
SmartResponse
Native Aspect Ratio
Display Number of Colours
Ports & Interfaces
PC Audio in
Microphone in
DisplayPorts Quantity
HDMI Ports Quantity
DVI Port
Multimedia
Built-In Speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
RMS Rated Power
Number of Loudspeakers
Megapixel
TV Tuner Integrated
Design
Feet Colour
Colour of Product
Performance
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Thin Client
Thin Client Installed
Ergonomics
Height Adjustment
Tilt Angle
Tilt Adjustment
VESA Mounting Interfaces
VESA Mounting
Stand-By LED
Power LED
Number of OSD Languages
On Screen Display (OSD)
Power
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
AC Input Frequency
AC Input Voltage
Operational Conditions
Relative Humidity
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Certificates
Certification
Energy Star Certified
EPEAT Compliance
Weight & Dimensions
Package Weight
Package Height
Package Depth
Package Width
Weight With Stand
Height (with Stand)
Depth (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Weight
Height
Depth
Width
Packaging Content
Quick Start Guide
Manual
Other Features
Quantity

1 Award

SweClockers.com Good Product

Expert Reviews

16 May 2014

Vad Philips 272C4QPJKAB har som styrka är utan tvekan dess pris och goda bildprestanda. Du får en PLS-panel med den grundkvalitet du kan vänta dig från den paneltekniken. Jämför vi med en...

SweClockers.com

High resolution, webcam and dual-display functionality, lots of screen space, plenty of connections, nice looking display, sharp detail, power saving sensor, good viewing angles
Goda skrmegenskaper
Utmrkt panel bildkvalitet
Hg byggkvalitet
Mnga finesser extrafunktioner
Colours not accurate, light leak along the top of the panel, colour hotspot in corner, menu system awkward and cramped, stand not sturdy
Rangligt stativ
Knligt menysystem
Dlig ergonomi
Ej helt genomtnkta extrafunktioner

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on $46.11
Electricity cost when on standby $1.84
@ $0.10525476 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price $per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ $0.0015024368 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price $per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years $47.95
Running costs for this PC monitor have been estimated based on other similar PC monitors. If you know how much electricity and water the Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 9 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers 272c4qpjkab, philips 272c4, 272c4qpjkab00, philips 272c4q, philips 272c4qp, philips 272c4qpj, philips 272c4qpjk, philips 272c4qpjka, philips 272c4qpjkab
Barcodes 00712581663933, 05054484452188, 08712581663933

See How Other PC Monitors Compare to the Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00

Benq BL3200 vs Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00

Benq BL3200 vs Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00
Benq BL3200 Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00
$ 398.99
Four More Awards
Prad.de Review is Significantly Better
2x Faster Response Time
Hugely More Display Colour Count
One Less HDMI Port
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $77.38

Foris FS2434 vs 272C4QPJKAB/00

Eizo Foris FS2434 vs Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00
Eizo Foris FS2434 Philips 272C4QPJKAB/00
$ 399.00
Four More Awards
Vastly Better Prad.de Review
Faster Response Time
17 Months Newer
161% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Significantly Smaller Viewable Width
Feedback