Close

Loading image...
Philips 245C5QHAW/57
2 Images

Philips 245C5QHAW/57 PC Monitor

23.8" 1920 X 1080 20000000:1 LED Jan 2015
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Release Date
The Philips Moda 2 combines stunning visuals with the convenience of a Bluetooth speaker system in one refined package. Easily stream your music and take calls from the powerful Bluetooth speaker... More
$21.80 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

9 Reasons For

Philips Has Good PC Monitor Reviews

On average Philips medium monitors have good reviews compared to other brands as do all PC displays built by Philips.

LED Display Type

This flatpanel monitor has an LED display type, which is the most frequently found display type on PC screens that have been on the market for more than two years.

Chart Edit

Has a Built-In Speaker

Unlike most of the other similar spec flatpanel monitors that were released around the same time as the 245C5 which do not have a built-in speaker, the Philips 245C5 has a built-in speaker.

Chart Edit

Three HDMI Ports

The Philips 245C5 is a three HDMI port flatpanel monitor. Most of the other flatpanel monitors of this age and type have between one and three HDMI ports.

Chart Edit

Quite High RMS Rated Audio Power

The RMS rated audio powers of LCD screens of a similar age and type to the 245C5 range from 0.5W to 49W, and the average RMS rated audio power is 5.2W. The Philips 245C5 has one of the higher RMS rated audio powers (14 Watts) amongst medium monitors of this age.

Chart Edit

1080p Video Mode

This PC screen has a 1080p video mode, which is typical of many similar spec PC screens that have been on the market for around the same time as it.

Chart Edit

1920 X 1080 (HD 1080) Graphics Resolution

This LCD screen has a graphics resolution of 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), which is typical of many medium monitors that have been around for a comparable time to it.

Chart Edit

Quite Low Power Consumption When Active

At only 16.41 Watts, the Philips 245C5 has a quite low power consumption when active compared to most of the other PC monitors that have been around for a similar time to the 245C5. The power consumptions when active of medium monitors that were released more than two years ago range from 9W to 63W.

Chart Edit

Very Shallow

With a depth of only 39 millimeters, the Philips 245C5 is quite shallow compared to most of the other medium monitors that were released more than two years ago. Comparable spec PC screens that are a similar age to the 245C5 have depths of between 12mm and 560mm.

Chart Edit

5 Reasons Against

Not 3D Compatible

The Philips 245C5 is not 3D compatible, although it is worth noting that most of the other similar spec PC screens that were launched around the same time as the 245C5 are also not 3D compatible.

Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

Like most of the other flatpanel monitors of this age and spec, the Philips 245C5 does not have a built-in camera.

Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Integrated Card Reader

The Philips 245C5 does not have an integrated card reader. Most of the other PC displays that have been available for more than two years also do not have an integrated card reader.

Chart Edit

Only HD HD Type

This PC monitor has a Full HD HD type, which is the most commonly found HD type on similar spec PC monitors that were released more than two years ago.

Chart Edit

Quite Slow Response Time

Across all the medium monitors that are a comparable age to the 245C5 the response times range from 1ms to 40ms. When compared to other similar spec PC displays that were released more than two years ago that we have checked, the response time of the Philips 245C5 of 14 milliseconds is one of the slowest.

Chart Edit

3 Other reasons to consider the Philips 245C5QHAW/57

Released Over Two Years Ago

It was over two years ago when this Philips PC monitor was released.

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This PC monitor has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is the most frequently found display resolution on comparable spec PC displays that have been available for a similar time to it.

Chart Edit

Average Width

With a width of 540 millimeters, the Philips 245C5 has a relatively standard width compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been around for more than two years.

Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Display Diagonal
Display Resolution
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
Display
3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
Backlight Type
Supported Video Modes
HD Type
HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Display SRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Viewable Size, Vertical
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Aspect Ratio
Vertical Scan Range
Horizontal Scan Range
Pixel Pitch
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Contrast Ratio (typical)
Display Diagonal (metric)
Display Technology
Display Brightness
Response Time
DDC/CI
Native Aspect Ratio
Display Number of Colours
Ports & Interfaces
DC-In Jack
PC Audio in
Headphone Outputs
HDMI Ports Quantity
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Multimedia
Built-In Speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
Built-In Microphone
RMS Rated Power
Number of Loudspeakers
TV Tuner Integrated
Design
Feet Colour
Colour of Product
Heavy Metals Free
Performance
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Thin Client
Thin Client Installed
Networking
Bluetooth
Ergonomics
Height Adjustment
Tilt Angle
Tilt Adjustment
VESA Mounting
Plug and Play
On/off Switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
On Screen Display (OSD)
Power
Power Consumption (off)
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
AC Input Frequency
AC Input Voltage
Operational Conditions
Relative Humidity
Operating Altitude
Non-Operating Altitude
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Certificates
Certification
Energy Star Certified
EPEAT Compliance
Weight & Dimensions
Package Weight
Package Height
Package Depth
Package Width
Weight With Stand
Height (with Stand)
Depth (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Height
Depth
Width
Other Features
Audio In/out
Regulatory Approvals
Recyclable Packaging Material

Expert Reviews

Continuando nossa série de reviews focados na convergência tecnológica, apresentamos a análise de mais um monitor. Temos procurado trazer produtos com algum tipo de diferencial e neste caso... Read more…

Design
Caixa de som integrada Bluetooth
MHLHDMI
Acabamento diferenciado, timas imagens
Conectividade apurada, udio interessante
Pixel pitch
0 2745 X 0 2745 mm, ngulo de viso
178 (A) 178 (V)
Cores da tela
16 7m Frequncia de varredura

Brochures and Manuals

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on $19.86
Electricity cost when on standby $2.30
@ $0.105008202 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price $per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ $0.00149891736 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price $per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years $22.16
Running costs for this PC monitor have been estimated based on other similar PC monitors. If you know how much electricity and water the Philips 245C5QHAW/57uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
0.15T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.15 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 4 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers 245c5qhab27, 245c5qhaw57, 245c5qhab69, philips 245c5, philips 245c5q, philips 245c5qh, philips 245c5qha, philips 245c5qhab
Barcodes 00609585243972, 08712581715847, 08712581715861

See How Other PC Monitors Compare to the Philips 245C5QHAW/57

NEC EA275UHD vs Philips 245C5QHAW/57

NEC EA275UHD vs Philips 245C5QHAW/57
NEC EA275UHD Philips 245C5QHAW/57
$ 625.00
9ms Faster Response Time
99% More Display Colour Count
104mm Shorter
100 Cd/m² Brighter Display Brightness
Only One HDMI Port
Hugely Lower RMS Rated Audio Power

Asus PB279 vs Philips 245C5QHAW/57

Asus PB279 vs Philips 245C5QHAW/57
Asus PB279 Philips 245C5QHAW/57
$ 517.85
Faster Response Time
Significantly More Display Colour Count
One More HDMI Port
17% Brighter Display Brightness
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $55.40
Three Times Lower RMS Rated Audio Power

XB271HKbmiprz vs 245C5QHAW/57

Acer XB271HKbmiprz vs Philips 245C5QHAW/57
Acer XB271HKbmiprz Philips 245C5QHAW/57
$ 999.99
Vastly Faster Response Time
1,053.23M More Display Colour Count
Newer by Six Months
Brighter Display Brightness
Two Less HDMI Ports
$69.63 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
Feedback