HP Pavilion 25xw
HP Pavilion 25xw
6 Images + 1 Video
Share on

Loading image...


Overall Score

HP Pavilion 25xw

1920 X 1080 PC Monitor
25" 1920 X 1080 Pixels 10000000:1 LED Aug 2015
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Release Date
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Available from international sellers only

Notify Me When Available See International Prices
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product

HP Pavilion 25xw Review

3 Great Features
1 Year Old
£75 Over 8 Years
Overall Score

Why Has it Scored 25?

It has below average user reviews with an average user rating of 60%.
At over a year old this PC display is slightly out of date, and newer PC monitors with more up to date technology are available. View the latest LCD screens 2017.
This PC monitor has running costs of £75 over 8 years, which are typical compared to the other 659 recently released medium monitors that we have compared it to.
It is missing some features:
Quite slow response time
Does not have a built-in speaker(s)

HP Pavilion 25xw Video Reviews

HP Pavilion 25xw In-Depth Analysis


Good Brand

Based on 2,103 owner and expert reviews (including 397 verified purchases), HP has good ratings for its LCD screens. HP also has good ratings specifically for its medium monitors compared to other manufacturers. 92% of those that bought a HP flatpanel monitor would recommend the product that they bought to other buyers.


Quite Slow Response Time

Across all the latest PC screens the response times range from 1ms to 250ms, and the average response time is 5.6ms. At 7 milliseconds, the Pavilion 25xw has a quite slow response time compared to most of the other medium monitors that were released around the same time as this PC screen.

What does "response time" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This PC display has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is typical of many latest medium monitors.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Speaker(s)

The HP Pavilion 25xw does not have a built-in speaker(s). Most of the other new medium monitors do have a built-in speaker(s).

What is a built-in speaker(s)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Two HDMI Ports

Most new similar spec PC screens have between one and four HDMI ports, including the HP Pavilion 25xw which has two HDMI ports.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has AC and VGA

The Pavilion 25xw has a greater number of cables included than most PC screens that have been around for around the same time as it. This HP flatpanel monitor has an AC cables included, which is the most commonly found cables included found on recently released medium monitors. The cables included "VGA" is also found on this PC display.

What does "cables included" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Energy Star Certified

The Pavilion 25xw is Energy Star certified. Most of the other comparable spec PC monitors that are a similar age to this PC display also are Energy Star certified.

Chart Hide Chart Edit


Released Over a Year Ago

It was August 2015 when HP released the Pavilion 25xw.

Running Costs

Running Costs Are Average

The average running cost of the Pavilion 25xw is £75 over 8 years based on average energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 659 recently released medium monitors.

Calculate your own running costs

HP Pavilion 25xw Review Sources

To prepare this HP Pavilion 25xw review we compared this PC monitor to 100 other models. For each PC monitor that we compared, we collated thousands of pieces of information including technical specs, reviews, and prices. In total we analysed 706,034 product attributes, 86,771 PC monitor reviews and 7,740,600 historical PC monitor prices from 203 PC monitor retailers. We then picked out the standout features of this PC monitor compared to the other models as well as any areas where this PC monitor is lacking.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers hp j7y65aaaba
Barcodes 00712951044896, 00751443487636, 00888793389232, 00889028033258, 07626782374608
Vastly better user reviews
A lot faster response time
26% cheaper to run
One less HDMI ports quantity