Share on
Samsung S24D390 vs Samsung S24E390HL

Samsung S24D390 vs Samsung S24E390HL

(751)
Samsung S24D390
Samsung S24E390HL

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

1 Reason For
0% cheaper to run
Over five years the Samsung S24D390 only costs $44.14 to run but the Samsung S24E390HL costs $44.34 to run (0% more). Read more
1 Reason For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24E390HL is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Samsung S24D390 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Samsung S24D390 has a response time of 5msms, but the Samsung S24E390HL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Older by six months
The Samsung S24D390 is six months older than the Samsung S24E390HL.
1 Reason Against
0% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Samsung S24E390HL are $44.34 which is $0.20 more than the Samsung S24D390 over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

35 months Ago 29 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 42.91
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.23
Total running cost $ 44.14
Electricity cost - switched on $ 43.11
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.23
Total running cost $ 44.34

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
4.8kg
BEST
5.2kg
Package Height
393mm 140mm
BEST
Package Depth
132mm
BEST
391mm
Package Width
615mm 614mm
BEST

Display

Display Diagonal
23.6" 23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
600mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 293.22mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60cm
BEST
59.8cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 1
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 1
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 W
 Wi
 Win
 Windo
 Windows 8.1 En
 1
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 W
 Wi
 Win
 Windo
 Windows 8.1 En

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
21W 21W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
31kWh 30kWh
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 25W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
3.7kg
BEST
4kg
Height (with Stand)
409.2mm
BEST
409mm
Depth (with Stand)
209.8mm 181.9mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
547.8mm
BEST
548.3mm
Weight
3.3kg
BEST
3.5kg
Height
332.5mm 333.3mm
Depth
80.1mm 69.9mm
Width
547.8mm 548.3mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 VGA

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback