Share on
Philips 247E6 vs Samsung S24E390HL

Philips 247E6 vs Samsung S24E390HL

(3)
(751)
Philips 247E6
Samsung S24E390HL

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 17 hours ago
8 Prices from 4 Stores | $79.99-$240.77
No prices found

Reasons For

1 Reason For
15% cheaper to run
Over five years the Philips 247E6 only costs $37.86 to run but the Samsung S24E390HL costs $44.34 to run (17% more). Read more
2 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24E390HL is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Philips 247E6 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

User reviews are better
The Samsung S24E390HL has an average user review score of 85%, however the Philips 247E6 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Philips 247E6 has a response time of 5msms, but the Samsung S24E390HL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Older by 10 months
The Philips 247E6 is 10 months older than the Samsung S24E390HL.
User review Rating is Worse
The Philips 247E6's average user score is 80%, however the Samsung S24E390HL's is 85% (based on 749 reviews).
2 Reasons Against
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
More expensive to run over five years by 17%
The running costs over five years of the Samsung S24E390HL are $44.34 which is $6.48 more than the Philips 247E6. Show assumptions.

Awards

1 Award
hardware.info: Bronze Award
1 Award
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

39 months Ago 29 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.81
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 37.86
Purchase price $ 79.99
Total cost of ownership $ 117.85
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 43.11
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.23
Total running cost $ 44.34

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.23T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
4.9kg
BEST
5.2kg
Package Height
490mm 140mm
BEST
Package Depth
100mm
BEST
391mm
Package Width
598mm
BEST
614mm

Display

Display Diagonal
23.6" 23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
599mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
293.22mm 293.22mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
521.28mm 521.28mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
59.9cm
BEST
59.8cm
Display Technology
 LCD
 LCD
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 1
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Multimedia

RMS Rated Power
6W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Speaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Feet Colour
 White
 White
Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metals Free
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 1
 Windows 8 Enterp
 W
 Wi
 Windows 7 Home Premiu
 Windows 7
 Win
 Windo
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8.1 En
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 1
 Windows 8 Enterp
 W
 Wi
 Windows 7 Home Premiu
 Windows 7
 Win
 Windo
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8.1 En
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
50,000h Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
Number of OSD Languages
21 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption (off)
0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
16.23W
BEST
21W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 25W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 BSMI
 CB
 CCC
 CE
 FCC
 PSB
 WEEE
 FCC/B
 CE Mark
 FCC Class B
 SEMKO
 GOST
 SASO
 FCC-B
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 BSMI
 CB
 CCC
 CE
 FCC
 PSB
 WEEE
 FCC/B
 CE Mark
 FCC Class B
 SEMKO
 GOST
 SASO
 FCC-B
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
3.7kg
BEST
4kg
Height (with Stand)
429mm 409mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
212mm 181.9mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
561mm 548.3mm
BEST
Weight
3.3kg
BEST
3.5kg
Height
347mm 333.3mm
Depth
43mm 69.9mm
Width
561mm 548.3mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 VGA
BEST

Other Features

Recyclable Material Content
100% Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback