Share on
DELL U2414H vs DELL U2515H

DELL U2414H vs DELL U2515H

(568)
(495)
DELL U2414H
DELL U2515H

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

1 Reason For
53% cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL U2414H only costs $34.90 to run but the DELL U2515H costs $73.91 to run (112% more). Read more
5 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2515H is a 25"" PC monitor. That's 1.2" bigger than the DELL U2414H (25""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2ms faster response time Edit
The DELL U2515H has a response time of 6msms, but the DELL U2414H is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Three more awards
The DELL U2515H has 6 awards from expert review sites, whereas the DELL U2414H has 3 awards.
Much better expert reviews
Based on 14 reviews, the average expert review score of the DELL U2515H is 92%, however the average rating of the DELL U2414H is 82% (based on 16 reviews).
Better user reviews
Based on 481 reviews, the average user review score of the DELL U2515H is 94%, however the average rating of the DELL U2414H is 88% (based on 552 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2414H is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 1.2" smaller than the DELL U2515H (25""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2414H has a response time of 8msms, but the DELL U2515H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Three less awards
The DELL U2414H has only received 3 awards, whereas the DELL U2515H has received 6 awards.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The DELL U2414H's average expert score is 82%, however the DELL U2515H's is 92% (based on 14 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL U2414H's average user score is 88%, however the DELL U2515H's is 94% (based on 481 reviews).
2 Reasons Against
Older by five months
The DELL U2515H is five months older than the DELL U2414H.
$39.01 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the DELL U2515H costs $73.91 to run which is $39.01 more to run than the DELL U2414H. Show assumptions.

Awards

3 Awards
alphr.com: Recommended
pcauthority.com.au: Hot Award
ua.gecid.com: High Functionality
6 Awards
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
cowcotland.com: Gold
hardware.info: Excellent
prohardver.hu: Recommended
SweClockers.com: Good Product
uk.hardware.info: Excellent

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

27 months Ago 32 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 32.85
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 34.90
Electricity cost - switched on $ 71.86
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 73.91

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.22T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.22 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.46T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.46 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
8kg
BEST
9.8kg

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 25"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1440p
 1080p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
Viewable Size Diagonal
605mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
296.46mm 335.66mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
527.04mm 596.74mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.47cm 68.58cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
8ms 6ms
BEST
Color Gamut
85% 99%
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Ultra Contrast
 Ultra Contrast
SRGB Coverage (typical)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
HDMI Port
2 2
Mini DisplayPort
1 1
DVI Port
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 5
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 1
 1
Dell E-Value Code
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
130mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 1
 1
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POR
 ESP
BEST
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POR
 ESP

Power

Input Current
1.5A 1.5A
Current Rating
1.5A 1.5A
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (typical)
16W
BEST
35W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
24kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
74W
BEST
87W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Non-Operating Altitude
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Operating Temperature (T-T)

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Compliance Industry Standards
 Rohs
BEST
 Rohs
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Bezel Width (bottom)
6.05mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (top)
6.05mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (side)
6.05mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
5.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
485.8mm
BEST
512.5mm
Depth (with Stand)
185mm
BEST
205mm
Width (with Stand)
539.1mm
BEST
569mm
Weight
3.6kg
BEST
4.4kg
Height
321.1mm 338.7mm
Depth
45.6mm 46.4mm
Width
539.1mm 569mm

Packaging Content

Bundled Software
 Drivers
 Driver
 Dell Display Manager
 Drivers
 Driver
 Dell Display Manager
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback