Share on
DELL P2715Q vs DELL U2715H

DELL P2715Q vs DELL U2715H

(172)
DELL P2715Q
DELL U2715H

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

1 Reason For
User reviews are better
The DELL P2715Q has an average user review score of 100% based on 1 review, but the DELL U2715H has an average rating of 93% (based on 166 reviews).
3 Reasons For
13% faster response time Edit
The DELL U2715H is an 8msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL P2715Q (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The DELL U2715H is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2715Q only has one HDMI port. Read more

This indicates the number of HDMI ports the monitor has.

More HDMI ports means that you can plug in more devices (computer, games console, DVD player, etc) to the screen at once.

Cheaper to run by $28.74
The DELL U2715H is $28.74 cheaper to run than the DELL P2715Q over five years. Read more

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 9msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the DELL U2715H (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL P2715Q is one, but the DELL U2715H only has two HDMI ports. Read more

This indicates the number of HDMI ports the monitor has.

More HDMI ports means that you can plug in more devices (computer, games console, DVD player, etc) to the screen at once.

One month older
The DELL P2715Q is older than the DELL U2715H by one month.
More expensive to run over five years by 38%
The DELL P2715Q costs $104.70 to run which is $28.74 more to run than the DELL U2715H over five years. Show assumptions.
1 Reason Against
Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the DELL U2715H is 93%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL P2715Q is 100% (based on 1 review).

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
prohardver.hu: Like it

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

31 months Ago 30 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 102.65
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 104.70
Electricity cost - switched on $ 73.91
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 75.96

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.65T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.47T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.47 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
10.7kg 10.5kg
BEST

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
 1440p
BEST
 2160p
 1440p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
Viewable Size, Vertical
335.66mm 335.66mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
596.74mm 596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.47cm 68.58cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
9ms 8ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91%
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 6ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
2 2
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
Mini DisplayPort
1 1
DVI Port
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 5
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
1 1
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 1
 1

Power

Input Current
1.8A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Power Consumption (typical)
50W 36W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
95W 88W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Non-Operating Altitude
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Operating Temperature (T-T)

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Height (with Stand)
423.86mm
BEST
524.9mm
Depth (with Stand)
203.86mm
BEST
205mm
Width (with Stand)
640.74mm 612.7mm
BEST
Weight
5kg 4.9kg
BEST
Height
379.66mm 363.4mm
Depth
51.5mm 46.4mm
Width
640.74mm 612.7mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback