Share on
Benq GL2460 vs Benq RL2455

Benq GL2460 vs Benq RL2455

(827)
(515)
Benq GL2460
Benq RL2455

Top Prices

No prices found
Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
1 Price from 1 Store | $209.99

Reasons For

1 Reason For
16% cheaper to run
Over five years the Benq GL2460 only costs $48.45 to run but the Benq RL2455 costs $57.48 to run (19% more). Read more
4 Reasons For
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Benq GL2460 (1msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Benq GL2460 only has one HDMI port. Read more

This indicates the number of HDMI ports the monitor has.

More HDMI ports means that you can plug in more devices (computer, games console, DVD player, etc) to the screen at once.

Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 14 expert reviews, the Benq RL2455 has an average review score of 76%, whereas the Benq GL2460 has an average rating of 60% (based on 2 reviews).
User reviews are a bit better
Based on 501 user reviews, the Benq RL2455 has an average review score of 92%, whereas the Benq GL2460 has an average rating of 90% (based on 825 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The Benq GL2460 has a response time of 2msms, but the Benq RL2455 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The Benq GL2460 has one HDMI port, however the Benq RL2455 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

This indicates the number of HDMI ports the monitor has.

More HDMI ports means that you can plug in more devices (computer, games console, DVD player, etc) to the screen at once.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The Benq GL2460's average expert score is only 60%, however the Benq RL2455's is 76% (based on 14 reviews).
User review Rating is a little Worse
The Benq GL2460's average user score is 90%, however the Benq RL2455's is 92% (based on 501 reviews).
2 Reasons Against
One month older
The Benq RL2455 is older than the Benq GL2460 by one month.
19% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the Benq RL2455 are $57.48 which is $9.03 more than the Benq GL2460. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
eteknix.com: Gamer's Choice
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

47 months Ago 47 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 47.22
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.23
Total running cost $ 48.45
Electricity cost - switched on $ 55.43
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 57.48
Purchase price $ 209.99
Total cost of ownership $ 267.47
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
5.8kg 5.7kg
BEST
Package Height
649mm 420mm
BEST
Package Depth
417mm 134mm
BEST
Package Width
123mm
BEST
650mm

Display

Display Diagonal
24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 12000000:1
 12000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080i
 720p
 1080p
 1080i
 720p
Product Type
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.96cm 60.96cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
2ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 1
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Power
2W 4W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2
Speaker
2 2

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 1
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8 Enterp
 W
 Wi
 Windows 7 Home Premiu
 Windows 7
 Win
 Windo
 1
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8 Enterp
 W
 Wi
 Windows 7 Home Premiu
 Windows 7
 Win
 Windo

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 1
 1
Number of OSD Languages
17 17

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
23W
BEST
27W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Input Voltage
 96 - 264
 96 - 264
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
Compliance Industry Standards
 TCO
BEST
 TCO

Weight & Dimensions

Bezel Width (bottom)
16mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (top)
16mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (side)
16mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
4.3kg 4.1kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
434mm
BEST
435mm
Depth (with Stand)
194mm 189mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
565mm
BEST
579mm
Weight
4.3kg 4.1kg
BEST
Height
333mm 435mm
Depth
54mm 189mm
Width
565mm 579mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 AC
BEST
 AC

Other Features

Quantity
Bezel Width
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback