Share on
Asus VP228H vs LG 22MP58VQ

Asus VP228H vs LG 22MP58VQ

(8)
(4)
Asus VP228H
LG 22MP58VQ

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 20 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
14 Prices from 13 Stores | $109.00-$149.49
eBay
Checked 3 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 24 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
B&H Photo
Checked 13 hours ago
18 Prices from 12 Stores | $109.99-$229.98

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
4x faster response time Edit
The Asus VP228H has a response time of 1msms, whereas the LG 22MP58VQ is a 5msms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper by $1
The Asus VP228H costs $109.00, whereas the LG 22MP58VQ is $109.99.
1 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Better selling
The Asus VP228H ranks No. 9096 by number of sales, but the LG 22MP58VQ ranks No. 23195.
4 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
LG 22MP58VQ is 178°° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° wider than the Asus VP228H (178°°). Read more

The vertical viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the screen can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

Marginally wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
LG 22MP58VQ is 178°° horizontal viewing angle, but the Asus VP228H is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower). Read more

The horizontal viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the monitor can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

$4.51 cheaper to run
The LG 22MP58VQ is $4.51 cheaper to run than the Asus VP228H over five years. Read more
User reviews are hugely better
Based on 3 reviews, the LG 22MP58VQ has an average user review score of 100%, but the Asus VP228H has an average rating of 75% (based on 8 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Asus VP228H is only 160°° vertical viewing angle, but the LG 22MP58VQ is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider). Read more

The vertical viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the screen can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Asus VP228H is only 170°° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° narrower than the LG 22MP58VQ (178°°). Read more

The horizontal viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the monitor can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

Older by three months
The Asus VP228H is three months older than the LG 22MP58VQ.
$4.51 more expensive to run over five years
The Asus VP228H costs $45.38 to run which is $4.51 more to run than the LG 22MP58VQ over five years. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is hugely Worse
The Asus VP228H only has an average user score of 75%, but the LG 22MP58VQ has an average user rating of 100% (based on 3 reviews).
4 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The LG 22MP58VQ is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Asus VP228H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$1 more expensive
The LG 22MP58VQ is more expensive than the Asus VP228H by $0.99.
Not as many stockists
Only 12 shops sells the LG 22MP58VQ, however 13 stores sell the Asus VP228H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Worse selling
The LG 22MP58VQ ranks No. 23195 by sales volume, but the Asus VP228H ranks No. 9096.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
xfastest.com: Fastest Media

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

22 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 43.33
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.05
Total running cost $ 45.38
Purchase price $ 109.00
Total cost of ownership $ 154.38
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 40.87
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 40.87
Purchase price $ 109.99
Total cost of ownership $ 150.86
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.28T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.28 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
5.3kg 3.2kg
BEST
Package Height
440mm 375mm
BEST
Package Depth
123mm
BEST
129mm
Package Width
565mm
BEST
579mm

Display

Display Diagonal
21.5" 21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
54.6cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 LCD
 LCD
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Power
3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Speaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 1
 1

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
21.1W 20W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 BSMI
 CB
 CCC
 CE
 FCC
 J-MOSS
 PSB
 UL/cUL
 VCCI
 WEEE
 WHQL
 CUL
 UL
 UL / C-UL
 FCC/B
 FCC-B
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 BSMI
 CB
 CCC
 CE
 FCC
 J-MOSS
 PSB
 UL/cUL
 VCCI
 WEEE
 WHQL
 CUL
 UL
 UL / C-UL
 FCC/B
 FCC-B
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 2.9kg
Height (with Stand)
373mm
BEST
81mm
Depth (with Stand)
199.4mm
BEST
396mm
Width (with Stand)
513mm 510mm
BEST
Weight
3.5kg 2.9kg
BEST
Height
309mm 81mm
Depth
52.1mm 304mm
Width
513mm 510mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 AC

Technical Details

Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback