Share on
Asus PB238 vs Samsung S23C450D

Asus PB238 vs Samsung S23C450D

(3)
Asus PB238
Samsung S23C450D

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 30 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
Overstock
Checked 20 hours ago
eBay
Checked 11 hours ago
19 Prices from 14 Stores | $209.99-$595.00
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 18 hours ago
1 Price from 1 Store | $239.95

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Asus PB238 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S23C450D is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower). Read more

The vertical viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the screen can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

5% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Asus PB238 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Samsung S23C450D (170°°). Read more

The horizontal viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the monitor can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

Cheaper by $30
The Asus PB238 is $29.96 cheaper than the Samsung S23C450D.
13 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by $6.57
Over five years the Asus PB238 is $6.57 cheaper to run than the Samsung S23C450D. Read more
1 Reason For
20% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S23C450D has a response time of 5msms, however the Asus PB238 is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
17% slower response time Edit
The Asus PB238 has a response time of 6msms, however the Samsung S23C450D is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Older by three months
The Asus PB238 is three months older than the Samsung S23C450D.
5 Reasons Against
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Samsung S23C450D is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Asus PB238 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider). Read more

The vertical viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the screen can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

5% narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Samsung S23C450D is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Asus PB238 (170°°). Read more

The horizontal viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the monitor can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the monitor can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the monitor to be able to view the screen successfully.

More expensive by $30
The Samsung S23C450D is $29.96 more expensive than the Asus PB238.
Fewer sellers
The Samsung S23C450D is only stocked by 1 store, but the Asus PB238 is stocked by 14 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Higher running costs over five years by $6.57
Over five years the running costs of the Samsung S23C450D are $51.74 which is $6.57 more than the Asus PB238. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

46 months Ago 43 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 45.17
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 45.17
Purchase price $ 209.99
Total cost of ownership $ 255.16
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 51.33
Electricity cost - standby $ 0.41
Total running cost $ 51.74
Purchase price $ 239.95
Total cost of ownership $ 291.69
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.28T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.28 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.32T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.32 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Packaging Data

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 185mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 396mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 620mm

Display

Display Diagonal
23" 23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
BEST
 50000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 286.74mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 509.76mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
58.4cm
BEST
58.42cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

USB 2.0 Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

RMS Rated Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Speaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 W
 Wi
 Windows 7 Home Premiu
 Windows 7
 Win
 Windo
 1
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 W
 Wi
 Windows 7 Home Premiu
 Windows 7
 Win
 Windo
 1

Ergonomics

Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5m
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 1
 1

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
22W
BEST
24W
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.1W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50
 60
AC Input Voltage
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5
 230,120,5,12
 230,120,12
 5,12,120,230
 120,230,5,12
 230,120,5,12,100-240
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 240
 12
 5

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 CB
 CE
 FCC
 UL/cUL
 WEEE
 WHQL
 CUL
 UL
 TUV Ergo
 UL / C-UL
 CCC
 PSB
 GOST
 SASO
 CSA
 PCBC
 SIQ
 RoHS
 TCO
 CB
 CE
 FCC
 UL/cUL
 WEEE
 WHQL
 CUL
 UL
 TUV Ergo
 UL / C-UL
 CCC
 PSB
 GOST
 SASO
 CSA
 PCBC
 SIQ
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
8kg 4.6kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
323.7mm
BEST
344.65mm
Depth (with Stand)
244.5mm 224mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
549mm 542.9mm
BEST
Weight
5.9kg 2.9kg
BEST
Height
323.7mm 321.4mm
Depth
57.6mm 55.45mm
Width
549mm 542.9mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC

Other Similar Comparisons

Feedback