DELL U2414H vs Eizo FlexScan EV2450

(229)
(4)
DELL U2414H
Eizo FlexScan EV2450

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 18 hours ago
gearbrokers
Checked 18 hours ago
Delivery unknown
Adorama
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Checked 18 hours ago
Overstock
Checked 1 day ago
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the DELL U2414H is two, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has one displayPorts quantity.
Five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2414H has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
1kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The DELL U2414H has an annual energy consumption of 24kWh, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 25kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh higher).
Lighter Edit
The DELL U2414H is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 190g lighter than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 (3.8kg).
$184 cheaper
The DELL U2414H costs $199.99, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is $384.44.
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the DELL U2414H is "A+", but the rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is "A+".
7 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the DELL U2414H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has a height adjustment of 140mm. That's 10mm higher than the DELL U2414H (140mm).
27W lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 47W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2414H is a 74W maximum power consumption PC monitor (27W higher).
Available from 2 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by $17.08
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is $17.08 cheaper to run than the DELL U2414H over five years. Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is "A+", whereas the rating of the DELL U2414H is "A+".
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 3 reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the DELL U2414H has an average rating of 89% (based on 219 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2414H is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2414H is a 130mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 (140mm).
27W higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL U2414H is 74W maximum power consumption, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 47W maximum power consumption PC monitor (27W lower).
Not as many stockists
Only 5 shops sells the DELL U2414H, however 7 stores sell the Eizo FlexScan EV2450. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
109% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the DELL U2414H are $32.73 which is $17.08 more than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450. Show assumptions.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The DELL U2414H has an average user rating of 89%, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 3 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2414H only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Only three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is three, but the DELL U2414H only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
1kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has an annual energy consumption of 25kWh, however the DELL U2414H is a 24kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh lower).
Heavier Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 3.8kg weight PC monitor. That's 190g heavier than the DELL U2414H (3.8kg).
$184 more expensive
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is more expensive than the DELL U2414H by $184.45.
One month older
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is older than the DELL U2414H by one month.

Awards

3 Awards
alphr.com: Recommended
pcauthority.com.au: Hot Award
ua.gecid.com: High Functionality
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

25 months Ago 26 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.80
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.93
Total running cost $ 32.73
Purchase price $ 199.99
Total cost of ownership $ 232.72
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 14.29
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 15.65
Purchase price $ 384.44
Total cost of ownership $ 400.09
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.22T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.22 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.1T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
3
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 59 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 31 - 68
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 296.4mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 527mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
56 - 76 55 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 31 - 81
Pixel Pitch
0.2745 x 0.2745 0.2745 x 0.2745
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 60cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 5ms
BEST
DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
85% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Ultra Contrast
 Ultra Contrast
SRGB Coverage (typical)
96 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Microphone in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Microphone in
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
Audio Output
 Audio output
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
5
BEST
3
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
1 1
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 2W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated
Built-In Subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in subwoofer

Design

Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 180 -90 - 90
Height Adjustment
130mm 140mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-6.5 - 22 -5 - 35
Tilt Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 90 -172 - 172
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POR
 ESP
 CHI (TR)
 ITA
 SWE
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POR
 ESP
 CHI (TR)
 ITA
 SWE
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 9
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
 LED indicators

Power

Power Management
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power management
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Power Consumption (typical)
16W 12W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
24kWh
BEST
25kWh
Power Consumption (max)
74W 47W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 120-230
 240
 12
 24
 100
 120
 230
 100-240
 120-230
 240
 12

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 20 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Compliance Industry Standards
 Rohs
 Rohs
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
5.5kg
BEST
6.2kg
Height (with Stand)
355.6mm
BEST
473.5mm
Depth (with Stand)
185mm
BEST
233mm
Width (with Stand)
538.5mm 537.6mm
BEST
Weight
3.6kg
BEST
3.8kg
Height
320mm 317.6mm
Depth
45.7mm 47.9mm
Width
538.5mm 537.6mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

USB Charging Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback