Acer G247HYL vs Asus VS24 vs DELL U2412M vs HP EliteDisplay E242

(102)
(624)
Asus VS24
DELL U2412M
HP EliteDisplay E242

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Checked 7 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 33 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Checked 21 hours ago
Amazon US
Checked 54 minutes ago
Out of stock
Newegg UK
Checked 1 day ago
Best Buy
Checked 1 day ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
eBay
Checked 21 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 22 hours ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 8 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
PC Rush
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
4ms faster response time Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a response time of 4ms, whereas the Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower), the DELL U2412M is an 8ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

4% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 29kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 1kWh lower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (30kWh).
1.6kg lighter Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a weight of 2.6kg, but the DELL U2412M is a 4kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg heavier) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (1.6kg heavier).
8 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Better selling
The Acer G247HYL ranks No. 1610 by number of sales, but the Asus VS24 ranks No. 33066.
5 Reasons For
2% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 24.1" PC monitor. That's 0.3" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24") and 0.1" bigger than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus VS24 has a display diagonal (metric) of 61.13cm. That's 0.63cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (61cm), 0.17cm bigger than the DELL U2412M (61cm) and 0.13cm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (61cm).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (250 cd/m²).
Cheaper by $24
The Asus VS24 costs $24 less than the Acer G247HYL, costs $86 less than the DELL U2412M and costs $126.21 less than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
48% cheaper to run
Over five years the Asus VS24 is $12.45 cheaper to run than the Acer G247HYL and $35.17 cheaper to run than the DELL U2412M. Read more
7 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The DELL U2412M has an HDCP (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP.
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2412M has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as does the Asus VS24), but the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both only 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2412M has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Acer G247HYL or the Asus VS24. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M has a height adjustment, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, whereas the Acer G247HYL and the Asus VS24 do not have a height adjustment.
Swivelling Edit
The DELL U2412M has a swivelling, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, whereas the Acer G247HYL does not.
Expert reviews are slightly better
The DELL U2412M has an average expert review score of 82%, but the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews).
User reviews are slightly better
The DELL U2412M has an average user review score of 93%, but the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 90% (based on 100 reviews).
7 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has an HDCP, and so does the DELL U2412M, but the Asus VS24 does not.
35mm higher height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2412M is only a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (35mm lower).
Height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a height adjustment (as does the DELL U2412M), whereas the Acer G247HYL and the Asus VS24 do not have a height adjustment.
Swivelling Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a swivelling (as does the DELL U2412M), whereas the Acer G247HYL does not have a swivelling.
88% lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 0.24W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.21W lower than the Acer G247HYL (0.24W).
Lower power consumption (max) Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 38W maximum power consumption. That's 34W lower than the DELL U2412M (38W).
$35.17 cheaper to run
Over five years the HP EliteDisplay E242 is $12.45 cheaper to run than the Acer G247HYL and $35.17 cheaper to run than the DELL U2412M. Read more

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 23.8" PC monitor. That's 0.3" smaller than the Asus VS24 (24") and 0.2" smaller than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Acer G247HYL is only 60.5cm display diagonal. That's 0.63cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cm), 0.46cm smaller than the DELL U2412M (61cm) and 0.5cm smaller than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (61cm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M (250 cd/m²).
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Acer G247HYL does not have a height adjustment (As does the the Asus VS24), however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 have a height adjustment.
Does not have a swivelling Edit
The Acer G247HYL does not have a swivelling, however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 do.
Higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.21W higher than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (0.24W).
More expensive by $24
The Acer G247HYL is $24 more expensive than the Asus VS24.
Older by four months
The Acer G247HYL is four months older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
$12.45 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs over five years of the Acer G247HYL are $50.44 which is $12.45 more than the Asus VS24 and $12.45 more than the HP EliteDisplay E242. Show assumptions.
8 Reasons Against
Does not have an HDCP Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP, but the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 have an HDCP.
Slower response time Edit
The Asus VS24 has a response time of 5ms, but the Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster), the DELL U2412M is an 8ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have a height adjustment (As does the the Acer G247HYL), whereas the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 do.
Less retailers
The Asus VS24 is only stocked by 7 retailers, whereas the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 14 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over two years
The Asus VS24 is two years older than the Acer G247HYL and two years older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
Less popular
The Asus VS24 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 33066 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Acer G247HYL ranks No. 1610.
Expert review Rating is a little Worse
The Asus VS24's average expert score is 80%, however the DELL U2412M's is 82% (based on 36 reviews).
User review Rating is a little Worse
The Asus VS24's average user score is 90%, however the DELL U2412M's is 93% (based on 588 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
0.1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M has a display diagonal of 24" (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the Acer G247HYL is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.2" smaller) and the Asus VS24 is a 24.1" PC monitor (0.1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A little smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL U2412M is only 60.96cm display diagonal, but the Acer G247HYL is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.46cm smaller), the Asus VS24 is a 61.13cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.17cm bigger) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.039999999999999cm bigger).
50% slower response time Edit
The DELL U2412M is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Acer G247HYL (7ms), 3ms slower than the Asus VS24 (7ms) and 1ms slower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

31% lower height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 35mm lower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (150mm).
A lot higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL U2412M is 72W maximum power consumption, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 38W maximum power consumption PC monitor (34W lower).
35% heavier Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 4kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.4kg heavier than the Acer G247HYL (4.2kg) and 230g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (4.2kg).
$86 more expensive
The DELL U2412M is more expensive than the Acer G247HYL by $62 and more expensive than the Asus VS24 by $86.
Not as many stockists
Only 7 shops sells the DELL U2412M, however 14 retailers sell the Acer G247HYL. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over four years older
The DELL U2412M is older than the Acer G247HYL by four years, older than the Asus VS24 by 22 months and older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by four years.
More expensive to run over five years by 93%
Over five years the DELL U2412M costs $73.16 to run which is $22.72 more to run than the Acer G247HYL, $35.17 more to run than the Asus VS24 and $35.17 more to run than the HP EliteDisplay E242. Show assumptions.
9 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 24" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24") and 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is only 61cm display diagonal. That's 0.5cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (61cm), 0.13cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cm) and 0.039999999999999cm bigger than the DELL U2412M (61cm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Acer G247HYL. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M (250 cd/m²).
A lot slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a response time of 7ms, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster), the Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the DELL U2412M is an 8ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two less USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the DELL U2412M only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Acer G247HYL or the Asus VS24. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 30kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 1kWh higher than the Acer G247HYL (30kWh).
A lot heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a weight of 4.2kg, but the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kg weight PC monitor (1.6kg lighter) and the DELL U2412M is a 4kg weight PC monitor (230g lighter).
More expensive by $126
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is $102.21 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL, $126.21 more expensive than the Asus VS24 and $40.21 more expensive than the DELL U2412M.
Not as many stockists
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is only stocked by 6 stores, however the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 14 retailers, the Asus VS24 is stocked by 7 stores and the DELL U2412M is stocked by 7 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 10 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
computertotaal.nl: Editor's Choice
extrahardware.cz: Smart Buy
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good Value
tomshardware.co.uk: Approved
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 44 months Ago 66 months Ago 16 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 48.54
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.90
Total running cost $ 50.44
Purchase price $ 137.99
Total cost of ownership $ 188.43
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.73
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 37.99
Purchase price $ 113.99
Total cost of ownership $ 151.98
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 73.16
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 73.16
Purchase price $ 199.99
Total cost of ownership $ 273.15
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.73
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 37.99
Purchase price $ 240.20
Total cost of ownership $ 278.19
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.48T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.48 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 24.1"
BEST
24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
 HDCP
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 55 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.5cm 61.13cm
BEST
60.96cm 61cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
5ms 8ms 7ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 150mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 20 Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
BEST
 Swivelling
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Management
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power management
Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (off)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.24W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
25W
BEST
30W 38W 30W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.49W
BEST
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
29kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72W 38W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3048 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 10668 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 95
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
2.9kg
BEST
6.8kg 7.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 495mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 140mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 638mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.6kg
BEST
5.7kg 6.2kg
Height (with Stand)
407mm
BEST
440.9mm 513.5mm 519mm
Depth (with Stand)
185mm 205.5mm 180.3mm
BEST
189mm
Width (with Stand)
540mm
BEST
561.6mm 556mm 562.2mm
Weight
2.6kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 4kg 4.2kg
Height
325mm Unknown - Click to provide data 361.6mm 377.4mm
Depth
41.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data 64.9mm 50mm
Width
540mm Unknown - Click to provide data 556mm 562.2mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
 USB
 DVI
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 USB
 DVI
 VGA
 AC
 USB
 DVI
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 USB
 DVI
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback