Asus VS24 vs Benq ZOWIE RL2455 vs DELL U2412M vs Eizo ColorEdge CX240

(102)
(624)
(6)
Asus VS24
Benq ZOWIE RL2455
DELL U2412M
Eizo ColorEdge CX240

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Checked 1 day ago
Best Buy
Checked 24 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
No prices found
eBay
Checked 3 days ago
In stock (61 available)
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
No prices found

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
0.1" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus VS24 has a display diagonal of 24.1" (as does the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 24" PC monitors (0.1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (as do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
A little bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 61.13cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.17cm smaller) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is only a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.13cm smaller).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VS24 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
$85 cheaper
The Asus VS24 is $85.01 cheaper than the DELL U2412M.
7 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has an HDCP, and so do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240, whereas the Asus VS24 does not.
3% bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is 531.36mm viewable width. That's 12.96mm bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (518.4mm).
7ms faster response time Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a response time of 1ms, however the Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower), the DELL U2412M is an 8ms response time PC monitor (7ms slower) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.7ms response time PC monitor (6.7ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 only has one HDMI ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Asus VS24 or the DELL U2412M. It is possible that they do not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s), whereas the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 do not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Cheaper to run by $47.08
Over five years the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $11.91 cheaper to run than the Asus VS24, $47.08 cheaper to run than the DELL U2412M and $21.43 cheaper to run than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. Read more
Better selling
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349 by number of sales, whereas the Asus VS24 ranks No. 33066.
9 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The DELL U2412M has an HDCP, and so do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240, however the Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP.
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL U2412M has a viewing angle, vertical of 178° (as do the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2412M has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, and so do the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 8° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (300 cd/m²).
Three more USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2412M is a five USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Asus VS24 or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M has a height adjustment (as does the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), but the Asus VS24 does not have a height adjustment.
37% lower power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U2412M has a power consumption (max) of 72W. That's 26W lower than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (98W).
3.1kg lighter Edit
The DELL U2412M has a weight of 4kg, however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 4.1kg weight PC monitor (130g heavier) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.1kg weight PC monitor (3.1kg heavier).
Eight more awards
The DELL U2412M has 10 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has 2 awards.
10 Reasons For
Marginally bigger display diagonal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a display diagonal of 24.1" (as does the Asus VS24), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 24" PC monitors (0.1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

HDCP Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has an HDCP (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M), however the Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP.
8% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a viewable size, vertical of 324mm. That's 25.11mm bigger than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (324mm).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°, and so do the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
Slightly wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178° (as do the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Higher height adjustment Edit
Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 128mm maximum height adjustment. That's 13mm higher than the DELL U2412M (128mm).
Height adjustment Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a height adjustment, and so does the DELL U2412M, but the Asus VS24 does not.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 4 expert reviews, the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has an average review score of 88%, however the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews) and the DELL U2412M has an average rating of 82% (based on 36 reviews).
User reviews are better
Based on 2 user reviews, the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has an average review score of 100%, however the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 90% (based on 100 reviews) and the DELL U2412M has an average rating of 93% (based on 588 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Does not have an HDCP Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP, however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 do.
80% slower response time Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.7ms), 3ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7.7ms) and 2.7ms faster than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (7.7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As do the the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have a height adjustment, but the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 have a height adjustment.
Over three years older
The Asus VS24 is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by three years.
More expensive to run over five years by 46%
Over five years the Asus VS24 costs $37.99 to run which is $11.91 more to run than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Asus VS24 ranks No. 33066 by sales volume, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Asus VS24 is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2412M is 82% (based on 36 reviews) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 88% (based on 4 reviews).
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Asus VS24 is 90%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL U2412M is 93% (based on 588 reviews) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 24" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (24.1"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 298.89mm viewable height PC monitor, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 324mm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm bigger).
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 are all 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
5% narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (178°).
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.17cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (61cm).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (300 cd/m²).
Marginally heavier Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kg, whereas the DELL U2412M is a 4kg weight PC monitor (130g lighter) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.1kg weight PC monitor (3kg heavier).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
10 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 24" PC monitor, and so does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. That's 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (24.1"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

1% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U2412M has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.96cm, and so does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. That's 0.17cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (61cm).
7ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2412M has a response time of 8ms, but the Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (7ms faster) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.7ms response time PC monitor (0.3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The DELL U2412M does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As do the the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Lower height adjustment Edit
DELL U2412M is only 115mm maximum height adjustment, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 128mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (13mm higher).
More expensive by $85
The DELL U2412M is $85.01 more expensive than the Asus VS24.
Older by over four years
The DELL U2412M is 22 months older than the Asus VS24, five years older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and 16 months older than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240.
$47.08 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the DELL U2412M are $73.16 which is $35.17 more than the Asus VS24, $47.08 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and $25.65 more than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 over five years. Show assumptions.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The DELL U2412M's average expert score is 82%, however the Eizo ColorEdge CX240's is 88% (based on 4 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL U2412M's average user score is 93%, however the Eizo ColorEdge CX240's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
12 Reasons Against
A bit smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 518.4mm viewable width PC monitor, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mm viewable width PC monitor (12.96mm bigger).
0.13cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a display diagonal (metric) of 61cm, however the Asus VS24 is a 61.13cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.13cm bigger) and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.039999999999999cm smaller).
Slower response time Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.7ms response time PC monitor. That's 2.7ms slower than the Asus VS24 (7.7ms), 6.7ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.7ms) and 0.3ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7.7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has one HDMI ports quantity, however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Asus VS24 or the DELL U2412M. It is possible that they do not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Only two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a two USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2412M only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Asus VS24 or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As do the the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M), but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 does. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

26W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a power consumption (max) of 98W, however the DELL U2412M is a 72W maximum power consumption PC monitor (26W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.1kg weight PC monitor. That's 3kg heavier than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.1kg) and 3.1kg heavier than the DELL U2412M (7.1kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over three years older
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is older than the Asus VS24 by six months and older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by four years.
82% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 are $47.51 which is $9.52 more than the Asus VS24 and $21.43 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has received 2 awards, the DELL U2412M has received 10 awards.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 10 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
computertotaal.nl: Editor's Choice
extrahardware.cz: Smart Buy
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good Value
tomshardware.co.uk: Approved
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
2 Awards
Ephotozine: Recommended
reviewed.com: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

44 months Ago 8 months Ago 66 months Ago 50 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.73
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 37.99
Purchase price $ 113.99
Total cost of ownership $ 151.98
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 23.82
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 26.08
Electricity cost - switched on $ 73.16
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 73.16
Purchase price $ 199.00
Total cost of ownership $ 272.16
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 45.25
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 47.51

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.48T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.48 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.32T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.32 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24.1"
BEST
24" 24" 24.1"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
 HDCP
BEST
 HDCP
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
55 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 23.75 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 68
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 298.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 531.36mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 47.5 - 61
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data 26 - 78
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.276 x 0.276 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
61.13cm
BEST
60.96cm 60.96cm 61cm
Display Technology
 LCD
 LCD
 LCD
 LCD
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms 1ms
BEST
8ms 7.7ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-I Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 128mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
BEST
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 30
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 344
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 17
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 9
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Management
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power management
Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
30W 20W
BEST
38W 38W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72W
BEST
98W
AC Input Frequency
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3048 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 10668 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90 5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.8kg 5.7kg
BEST
7.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
495mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
140mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
638mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
4.6kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.7kg 9.9kg
Height (with Stand)
440.9mm 435mm 513.5mm 417mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
205.5mm 189mm 180.3mm
BEST
245.5mm
Width (with Stand)
561.6mm 579mm 556mm
BEST
575mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg 4kg
BEST
7.1kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 350mm 361.6mm 398mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 63mm 64.9mm 75mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 579mm 556mm 575mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback