Acer G247HYL vs Benq ZOWIE RL2455 vs DELL U2412M vs HP EliteDisplay E242

(624)
Benq ZOWIE RL2455
DELL U2412M
HP EliteDisplay E242

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Checked 19 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 19 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Checked 21 hours ago
Amazon US
Checked 24 hours ago
Out of stock
No prices found
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
In stock (61 available)
B&H Photo
Checked 22 hours ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
B&H Photo
Checked 22 hours ago
In stock
eBay
Checked 21 hours ago
PC Rush
Checked 16 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
A bit lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer G247HYL has an annual energy consumption of 29kWh, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 30kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh higher).
62% lighter Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.5kg lighter than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (4.2kg), 1.4kg lighter than the DELL U2412M (4.2kg) and 1.6kg lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (4.2kg).
$60 cheaper
The Acer G247HYL costs $138.99, whereas the DELL U2412M is $199.00 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is $240.20.
Available from 8 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
7 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 24" PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 12.96mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (518.4mm).
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a response time of 1ms, but the Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower), the DELL U2412M is an 8ms response time PC monitor (7ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (6ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has two HDMI ports quantitys, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has one HDMI ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s), however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 do not. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

64% cheaper to run
Over five years the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only costs $26.08 to run but the Acer G247HYL costs $50.32 to run (93% more), the DELL U2412M costs $73.16 to run (181% more) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 costs $37.99 to run (46% more). Read more
Better selling
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349 by number of sales, however the Acer G247HYL ranks No. 1405.
7 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 24" PC monitor, and so do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
DELL U2412M is 178° vertical viewing angle (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
DELL U2412M is 178° horizontal viewing angle, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 8° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer G247HYL, the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (250 cd/m²).
Two more USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2412M has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Acer G247HYL or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M has a height adjustment (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), whereas the Acer G247HYL does not have a height adjustment.
Swivelling Edit
The DELL U2412M has a swivelling (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), whereas the Acer G247HYL does not have a swivelling.
10 Reasons For
A little bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a display diagonal of 24" (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M), but the Acer G247HYL is only a 23.8" PC monitor (0.2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

8% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 324mm viewable height. That's 25.11mm bigger than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (324mm).
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 178° vertical viewing angle, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
A bit wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 178° horizontal viewing angle (as does the DELL U2412M), but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
0.5cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 61cm display diagonal, but the Acer G247HYL is only a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.5cm smaller) and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.039999999999999cm smaller).
35mm higher height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 35mm higher than the DELL U2412M (150mm).
Height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a height adjustment, and so does the DELL U2412M, whereas the Acer G247HYL does not.
Swivelling Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a swivelling, and so does the DELL U2412M, whereas the Acer G247HYL does not have a swivelling.
Significantly lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 0.24W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.21W higher).
34W lower power consumption (max) Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 38W maximum power consumption, but the DELL U2412M is a 72W maximum power consumption PC monitor (34W higher).

Reasons Against

11 Reasons Against
0.2" smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a display diagonal of 23.8", but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455, the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are all 24" PC monitors (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slightly smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Acer G247HYL is only 60.5cm display diagonal, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.46cm bigger) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.5cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
75% slower response time Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7ms), 4ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7ms) and 3ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Acer G247HYL is one, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Acer G247HYL does not have a height adjustment, however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 have a height adjustment.
Does not have a swivelling Edit
The Acer G247HYL does not have a swivelling, however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 have a swivelling.
0.21W higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 0.24W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.21W lower).
One year older
The Acer G247HYL is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by one year and older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by four months.
More expensive to run over five years by 93%
The running costs of the Acer G247HYL are $50.32 which is $24.24 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and $12.33 more than the HP EliteDisplay E242 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Acer G247HYL ranks No. 1405 by sales volume, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349.
7 Reasons Against
A bit smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a viewable size, vertical of 298.89mm, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 324mm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm bigger).
12% narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a viewing angle, vertical of 160°, however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 170°. That's 8° narrower than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (178°).
1% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.96cm, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.46cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (61cm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (61cm).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL U2412M (250 cd/m²).
1.5kg heavier Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kg, however the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kg weight PC monitor (1.5kg lighter), the DELL U2412M is a 4kg weight PC monitor (130g lighter) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (100g heavier).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
10 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL U2412M is only 60.96cm display diagonal, and so does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. That's 0.46cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (61cm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (61cm).
Significantly slower response time Edit
The DELL U2412M has a response time of 8ms, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (4ms faster), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (7ms faster) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The DELL U2412M does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As does the the HP EliteDisplay E242), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A lot lower height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (35mm higher).
Higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL U2412M is 72W maximum power consumption. That's 34W higher than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (38W).
A lot heavier Edit
The DELL U2412M has a weight of 4kg, but the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg lighter), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 4.1kg weight PC monitor (130g heavier) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (230g heavier).
More expensive by $60
The DELL U2412M is $60.01 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL.
Not as many stockists
The DELL U2412M is only stocked by 7 stores, however the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 14 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over four years
The DELL U2412M is four years older than the Acer G247HYL, five years older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and four years older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
Higher running costs over five years by $47.08
The running costs over five years of the DELL U2412M are $73.16 which is $22.84 more than the Acer G247HYL, $47.08 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and $35.17 more than the HP EliteDisplay E242. Show assumptions.
12 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a viewable size, horizontal of 518.4mm, however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mm viewable width PC monitor (12.96mm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the Acer G247HYL and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455), but the DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Acer G247HYL (7ms), 6ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7ms) and 1ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the HP EliteDisplay E242 is one, and so does the Acer G247HYL, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Only three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the DELL U2412M only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Acer G247HYL or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As does the the DELL U2412M), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 does. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

1kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has an annual energy consumption of 30kWh, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 29kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh lower).
Heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6kg heavier than the Acer G247HYL (4.2kg), 100g heavier than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (4.2kg) and 230g heavier than the DELL U2412M (4.2kg).
$101 more expensive
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is more expensive than the Acer G247HYL by $101.21 and more expensive than the DELL U2412M by $41.20.
Not as many stockists
Only 6 stores sells the HP EliteDisplay E242, however 14 retailers sell the Acer G247HYL and 7 shops sell the DELL U2412M. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Eight months older
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by eight months.
46% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the HP EliteDisplay E242 are $37.99 which is $11.91 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 10 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
computertotaal.nl: Editor's Choice
extrahardware.cz: Smart Buy
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good Value
tomshardware.co.uk: Approved
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 8 months Ago 66 months Ago 16 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 48.42
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.90
Total running cost $ 50.32
Purchase price $ 138.99
Total cost of ownership $ 189.31
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 23.82
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 26.08
Electricity cost - switched on $ 73.16
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 73.16
Purchase price $ 199.00
Total cost of ownership $ 272.16
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.73
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 37.99
Purchase price $ 240.20
Total cost of ownership $ 278.19
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.48T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.48 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 24"
BEST
24"
BEST
24"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 298.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 531.36mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.276 x 0.276 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.5cm 60.96cm 60.96cm 61cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 1ms
BEST
8ms 7ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 150mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
BEST
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
BEST
 Swivelling
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 17 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Management
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power management
Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (off)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.24W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
25W 20W
BEST
38W 30W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.49W
BEST
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
29kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72W 38W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3048 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 10668 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 95
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
2.9kg
BEST
5.7kg 7.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5.7kg
BEST
6.2kg
Height (with Stand)
407mm
BEST
435mm 513.5mm 519mm
Depth (with Stand)
185mm 189mm 180.3mm
BEST
189mm
Width (with Stand)
540mm
BEST
579mm 556mm 562.2mm
Weight
2.6kg
BEST
4.1kg 4kg 4.2kg
Height
325mm 350mm 361.6mm 377.4mm
Depth
41.7mm 63mm 64.9mm 50mm
Width
540mm 579mm 556mm 562.2mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback