Acer G247HYL vs Asus VS24 vs Benq ZOWIE RL2455 vs HP EliteDisplay E242

(102)
Asus VS24
Benq ZOWIE RL2455
HP EliteDisplay E242

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Checked 6 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 15 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 24 hours ago
Out of stock
Newegg UK
Checked 1 day ago
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 1 day ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 15 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 18 hours ago
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Checked 21 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
PC Rush
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
1kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer G247HYL has an annual energy consumption of 29kWh, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 30kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh higher).
Lighter Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.5kg lighter than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (4.2kg) and 1.6kg lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (4.2kg).
7 Reasons For
0.3" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus VS24 has a display diagonal of 24.1", but the Acer G247HYL is only a 23.8" PC monitor (0.3" smaller) and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both only 24" PC monitors (0.1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
Asus VS24 is 178° vertical viewing angle, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Asus VS24 is 178° horizontal viewing angle (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
A bit bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
Asus VS24 is 61.13cm display diagonal, but the Acer G247HYL is only a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.63cm smaller), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.17cm smaller) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is only a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.13cm smaller).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VS24 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², but the Acer G247HYL, the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are all only 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
$25 cheaper
The Asus VS24 costs $113.99, whereas the Acer G247HYL is $138.99, the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $199.00 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is $240.20.
Available from 4 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
7 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has an HDCP, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, but the Asus VS24 does not.
3% bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a viewable size, horizontal of 531.36mm. That's 12.96mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (518.4mm).
6x faster response time Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a response time of 1ms, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower), the Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (6ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is two, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has one HDMI ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Asus VS24. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s), but the Asus VS24 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 do not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

$24.20 cheaper to run
Over five years the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $24.20 cheaper to run than the Acer G247HYL, $11.91 cheaper to run than the Asus VS24 and $11.91 cheaper to run than the HP EliteDisplay E242. Read more
Better selling
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349 by number of sales, but the Acer G247HYL ranks No. 980 and the Asus VS24 ranks No. 33066.
7 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has an HDCP (as does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455), whereas the Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP.
Bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 324mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 25.11mm bigger than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (324mm).
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Asus VS24. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (as does the Asus VS24), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a height adjustment, however the Acer G247HYL and the Asus VS24 do not have a height adjustment.
Swivelling Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a swivelling, however the Acer G247HYL does not.
0.21W lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a power consumption (off) of 0.24W, however the Acer G247HYL is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.21W higher).

Reasons Against

13 Reasons Against
A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a display diagonal of 23.8", whereas the Asus VS24 is a 24.1" PC monitor (0.3" bigger) and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both 24" PC monitors (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

0.63cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Asus VS24 is a 61.13cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.63cm bigger), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.46cm bigger) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.5cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242), whereas the Asus VS24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Asus VS24 (7ms), 3ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7ms) and 3ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Asus VS24. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Acer G247HYL does not have a height adjustment (As does the the Asus VS24), but the HP EliteDisplay E242 has a height adjustment.
Does not have a swivelling Edit
The Acer G247HYL does not have a swivelling, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 has a swivelling.
A lot higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a power consumption (off) of 0.45W, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 0.24W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.21W lower).
$25 more expensive
The Acer G247HYL is more expensive than the Asus VS24 by $25.
Fewer sellers
Only 6 retailers sells the Acer G247HYL, but 7 shops sell the Asus VS24. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
One year older
The Acer G247HYL is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by one year and older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by four months.
93% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the Acer G247HYL are $50.28 which is $12.29 more than the Asus VS24, $24.20 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and $12.29 more than the HP EliteDisplay E242. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Acer G247HYL ranks No. 980 by sales volume, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349.
7 Reasons Against
Does not have an HDCP Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have an HDCP, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 do.
80% slower response time Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Acer G247HYL (7ms), 4ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7ms) and 2ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As does the the HP EliteDisplay E242), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Asus VS24 does not have a height adjustment (As does the the Acer G247HYL), however the HP EliteDisplay E242 has a height adjustment.
Over three years older
The Asus VS24 is older than the Acer G247HYL by two years, older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by three years and older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by two years.
More expensive to run over five years by 46%
Over five years the running costs of the Asus VS24 are $37.99 which is $11.91 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Asus VS24 ranks No. 33066 by sales volume, but the Acer G247HYL ranks No. 980 and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 ranks No. 349.
9 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 24" PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24") and 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only 298.89mm viewable height, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 324mm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm bigger).
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only 160° vertical viewing angle, but the Asus VS24 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
5% narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only 170° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° narrower than the Asus VS24 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (178°).
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only 60.96cm display diagonal. That's 0.46cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (61cm), 0.17cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (61cm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24 (250 cd/m²).
A lot heavier Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kg, but the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kg weight PC monitor (1.5kg lighter) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (100g heavier).
More expensive by $85
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $60.01 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL and $85.01 more expensive than the Asus VS24.
Not as many stockists
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only stocked by 3 stores, however the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 6 shops, the Asus VS24 is stocked by 7 retailers and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is stocked by 6 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
13 Reasons Against
0.1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a display diagonal of 24" (as does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455), whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.2" smaller) and the Asus VS24 is a 24.1" PC monitor (0.1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12.96mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is only 518.4mm viewable width, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mm viewable width PC monitor (12.96mm bigger).
Slightly smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.5cm smaller), the Asus VS24 is a 61.13cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.13cm bigger) and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.039999999999999cm smaller).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the Acer G247HYL and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455), whereas the Asus VS24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
86% slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Acer G247HYL (7ms), 2ms slower than the Asus VS24 (7ms) and 6ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the Acer G247HYL, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Asus VS24. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As does the the Asus VS24), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A bit higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has an annual energy consumption of 30kWh, however the Acer G247HYL is a 29kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh lower).
39% heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6kg heavier than the Acer G247HYL (4.2kg) and 100g heavier than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (4.2kg).
$126 more expensive
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is more expensive than the Acer G247HYL by $101.21, more expensive than the Asus VS24 by $126.21 and more expensive than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by $41.20.
Fewer sellers
Only 6 retailers sells the HP EliteDisplay E242, but 7 retailers sell the Asus VS24. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Eight months older
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by eight months.
More expensive to run over five years by 46%
The running costs of the HP EliteDisplay E242 are $37.99 which is $11.91 more than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 over five years. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 44 months Ago 8 months Ago 16 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 48.38
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.90
Total running cost $ 50.28
Purchase price $ 138.99
Total cost of ownership $ 189.27
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.73
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 37.99
Purchase price $ 113.99
Total cost of ownership $ 151.98
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 23.82
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 26.08
Purchase price $ 199.00
Total cost of ownership $ 225.08
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 35.73
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 37.99
Purchase price $ 240.20
Total cost of ownership $ 278.19
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 24.1"
BEST
24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
 HDCP
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 55 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 298.89mm 324mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 531.36mm
BEST
518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 30 - 80
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.276 x 0.276 0.27 x 0.27
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
BEST
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
BEST
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.5cm 61.13cm
BEST
60.96cm 61cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 5ms 1ms
BEST
7ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 20 -5 - 15 -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (off)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.24W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
25W 30W 20W
BEST
30W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.49W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
29kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 38W
AC Input Frequency
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90 5 - 95
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
2.9kg
BEST
6.8kg 5.7kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 495mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 140mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 638mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.6kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg
Height (with Stand)
407mm
BEST
440.9mm 435mm 519mm
Depth (with Stand)
185mm
BEST
205.5mm 189mm 189mm
Width (with Stand)
540mm
BEST
561.6mm 579mm 562.2mm
Weight
2.6kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg 4.2kg
Height
325mm Unknown - Click to provide data 350mm 377.4mm
Depth
41.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data 63mm 50mm
Width
540mm Unknown - Click to provide data 579mm 562.2mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback