Share on
AOC I2757F vs Asus MX279H vs DELL S2715H

AOC I2757F vs Asus MX279H vs DELL S2715H

(649)
(318)
(20)
AOC I2757F
Asus MX279H
DELL S2715H

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 4 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 1 day ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: $7.40
PC Rush
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
1ms faster response time Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Asus MX279H. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$83 cheaper
The AOC I2757F costs $149.99, whereas the Asus MX279H is $232.99.
Five more awards
The AOC I2757F has 15 awards, however the Asus MX279H has 10 awards.
Expert reviews are slightly better
The AOC I2757F has an average expert review score of 83% based on 38 reviews, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews).
User reviews are slightly better
The AOC I2757F has an average user review score of 92% based on 611 reviews, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 88% (based on 283 reviews) and the DELL S2715H has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews).
5 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The Asus MX279H has an HDCP, however the AOC I2757F does not have an HDCP.
Faster response time Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the AOC I2757F. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The Asus MX279H has two HDMI ports, however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Available from 12 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More popular
The Asus MX279H is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 2694 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the AOC I2757F ranks No. 3630.
1 Reason For
$32.18 cheaper to run
The DELL S2715H only costs $42.23 to run over five years whereas the Asus MX279H costs $74.41 to run (76% more). Read more

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the AOC I2757F is one, and so does the DELL S2715H, but the Asus MX279H only has two HDMI ports.
Not as many stockists
Only 1 store sell the AOC I2757F, however 13 shops sell the Asus MX279H. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over two years older
The AOC I2757F is older than the DELL S2715H by two years. The AOC I2757F is the same age as the Asus MX279H.
Worse selling
The AOC I2757F ranks No. 3630 by sales volume, but the Asus MX279H ranks No. 2694.
6 Reasons Against
$83 more expensive
The Asus MX279H is more expensive than the AOC I2757F by $83.
Over two years older
The Asus MX279H is older than the DELL S2715H by two years. The Asus MX279H is the same age as the AOC I2757F.
76% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Asus MX279H are $74.41 which is $32.18 more than the DELL S2715H. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards, the AOC I2757F has received 15 awards.
A little Lower expert review Score
The Asus MX279H's average expert rating is 80%, however the AOC I2757F's is 83% (based on 38 reviews).
A little Lower user review Score
The Asus MX279H's average user rating is 88%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 611 reviews).
4 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL S2715H is one, and so does the AOC I2757F, but the Asus MX279H only has two HDMI ports.
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The DELL S2715H has an average user rating of 88%, but the AOC I2757F has an average user rating of 92% (based on 611 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elchapuzasinformatico.com: Silver
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hispazone.com: Recommended Product
in4.pl: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
macworld.co.uk: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Patented Design
thg.ru: Smart Buy
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
Tweak.dk: Great Product
10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

55 months Ago 55 months Ago 31 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 74.41
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 74.41
Purchase price $ 232.99
Total cost of ownership $ 307.40
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 40.22
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 42.23

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.47T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.47 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Full HD
 Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data 336.31mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
597.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data 597.89mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.6cm 68.6cm 68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W 18W
BEST
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - -5 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
BEST
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7A
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
Unknown - Click to provide data 37W 20W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 55W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
BEST
8.8kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 537mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 114mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 700mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 445mm
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 196mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 611.2mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.2kg 4.9kg
BEST
Height
449mm 441.3mm 361.5mm
Depth
130mm 225.2mm 46.1mm
Width
622mm 622.6mm 611.2mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
BEST
 AC adapter included

Other Features

Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Feedback