HP EliteDisplay E232 vs HP ProDisplay P240va

HP EliteDisplay E232
HP ProDisplay P240va

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a response time of 7ms, but the HP ProDisplay P240va is an 8ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in USB hub Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a built-in USB hub, whereas the HP ProDisplay P240va does not have a built-in USB hub.
Height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a height adjustment, but the HP ProDisplay P240va does not have a height adjustment.
8 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 23.8" PC monitor. That's 0.8" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 297.8mm viewable height PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232 is only a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor (11.38mm smaller).
Bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
HP ProDisplay P240va is 528.4mm viewable width. That's 19.22mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (528.4mm).
4% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 60.45cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.05cm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (60.45cm).
15% lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va has a power consumption (off) of 0.2W. That's 0.03W lower than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (0.2W).
10% lower power consumption (max) Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 32W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W lower than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (32W).
30g lighter Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va has a weight of 3.6kg, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor (30g heavier).
Cheaper to run by $3.57
Over five years the HP ProDisplay P240va only costs $32.03 to run however the HP EliteDisplay E232 costs $35.60 to run (11% more). Read more

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
4% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 23" PC monitor. That's 0.8" smaller than the HP ProDisplay P240va (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11.38mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a viewable size, vertical of 286.42mm, however the HP ProDisplay P240va is a 297.8mm viewable height PC monitor (11.38mm bigger).
4% smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 509.18mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 19.22mm smaller than the HP ProDisplay P240va (528.4mm).
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a display diagonal (metric) of 58.4cm. That's 2.05cm smaller than the HP ProDisplay P240va (60.45cm).
Higher power consumption (off) Edit
HP EliteDisplay E232 is 0.23W power consumption when off. That's 0.03W higher than the HP ProDisplay P240va (0.2W).
Higher power consumption (max) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a power consumption (max) of 35W. That's 3W higher than the HP ProDisplay P240va (32W).
A bit heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a weight of 3.6kg, however the HP ProDisplay P240va is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor (30g lighter).
Older by eight months
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is eight months older than the HP ProDisplay P240va.
Higher running costs over five years by $3.57
Over five years the HP EliteDisplay E232 costs $35.60 to run which is $3.57 more to run than the HP ProDisplay P240va. Show assumptions.
3 Reasons Against
13% slower response time Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va has a response time of 8ms, however the HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in USB hub Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va does not have a built-in USB hub, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232 does.
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va does not have a height adjustment, but the HP EliteDisplay E232 has a height adjustment.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

18 months Ago 10 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 33.34
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 35.60
Electricity cost - switched on $ 29.77
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 32.03

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23" 23.8"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1600 x 600
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1600 x 600
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
286.42mm 297.8mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
509.18mm 528.4mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 80 24 - 94
Pixel Pitch
0.265 x 0.265 0.274 x 0.274
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
58.4cm 60.45cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms
BEST
8ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
BEST
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
150mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 22
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (off)
0.23W 0.2W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
28W 25W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
28kWh 28kWh
Power Consumption (max)
35W 32W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
5.7kg 4.3kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
549.9mm 416.4mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
189mm
BEST
191.2mm
Width (with Stand)
549.3mm
BEST
571.2mm
Weight
3.6kg 3.6kg
BEST
Height
336.9mm 355.5mm
Depth
49.6mm 55mm
Width
549.3mm 571.2mm
Feedback