Acer KA270H vs HP Z23i

(6)
(4)
Acer KA270H
HP Z23i

Top Prices

B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
RPC Global Technology Store
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
Adorama
Checked 19 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 27" PC monitor. That's 4" bigger than the HP Z23i (23"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Z23i (250 cd/m²).
4ms faster response time Edit
The Acer KA270H has a response time of 4ms, whereas the HP Z23i is an 8ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Acer KA270H is 92%, but the average rating of the HP Z23i is 85% (based on 4 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Height adjustment Edit
The HP Z23i has a height adjustment, but the Acer KA270H does not have a height adjustment.
Cheaper by $21
The HP Z23i costs $20.99 less than the Acer KA270H.
2 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
1% cheaper to run
Over five years the HP Z23i only costs $35.60 to run but the Acer KA270H costs $35.98 to run (1% more). Read more

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Acer KA270H does not have a height adjustment, however the HP Z23i does.
More expensive by $21
The Acer KA270H is $20.99 more expensive than the HP Z23i.
Not as many stockists
The Acer KA270H is only stocked by 1 shop, however the HP Z23i is stocked by 3 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by two months
The Acer KA270H is two months older than the HP Z23i.
Higher running costs over five years by $0.38
The Acer KA270H costs $35.98 to run which is $0.38 more to run than the HP Z23i over five years. Show assumptions.
4 Reasons Against
18% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Z23i is a 23" PC monitor. That's 4" smaller than the Acer KA270H (23"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Z23i is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer KA270H (250 cd/m²).
4ms slower response time Edit
The HP Z23i has a response time of 8ms, but the Acer KA270H is a 4ms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

User review Rating is Worse
The HP Z23i's average user score is 85%, however the Acer KA270H's is 92% (based on 5 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

21 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 33.94
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.04
Total running cost $ 35.98
Purchase price $ 169.99
Total cost of ownership $ 205.97
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 33.34
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 35.60
Purchase price $ 149.00
Total cost of ownership $ 184.60
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27"
BEST
23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 286.4mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 509.1mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 24 - 94
Pixel Pitch
0.31 x 0.31 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 58.4cm
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
8ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 360
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
BEST
 C
Power Consumption (off)
0.35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
28.5W 28W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
59kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 36W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Height (with Stand)
478.9mm 469.9mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
200mm
BEST
242.9mm
Width (with Stand)
640mm 544mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.4kg
Height
381mm 329mm
Depth
62mm 51mm
Width
640mm 544mm
Feedback