HP EliteDisplay S240 vs Samsung S24C450

(33)
HP EliteDisplay S240
Samsung S24C450

Top Prices

Overstock
Checked 15 hours ago
eBay
Checked 21 hours ago
Antonline
Checked 21 hours ago
Delivery unknown
No prices found

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has an HDCP, however the Samsung S24C450 does not have an HDCP.
39% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a viewable size, vertical of 527mm. That's 203mm bigger than the Samsung S24C450 (324mm).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°. That's 18° wider than the Samsung S24C450 (160°).
Slightly wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, however the Samsung S24C450 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², however the Samsung S24C450 is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a four USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24C450 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a built-in speaker(s), however the Samsung S24C450 does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Built-in camera Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a built-in camera, whereas the Samsung S24C450 does not have a built-in camera. Read more

A built in camera allows you to use the monitor for video conferencing.

A built in camera allows you to use the monitor for video conferencing.

7 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 24" PC monitor. That's 0.2" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (24"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

1% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.96cm. That's 0.51cm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (60.96cm).
2ms faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a response time of 5ms, but the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Swivelling Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a swivelling, but the HP EliteDisplay S240 does not have a swivelling.
Pivot Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a pivot, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 does not have a pivot.
3.1kg lighter Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a weight of 3.5kg, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 6.6kg weight PC monitor (3.1kg heavier).
15% cheaper to run
Over five years the Samsung S24C450 only costs $59.98 to run but the HP EliteDisplay S240 costs $70.59 to run (18% more). Read more

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a display diagonal of 23.8", however the Samsung S24C450 is a 24" PC monitor (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

0.51cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.45cm, however the Samsung S24C450 is a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.51cm bigger).
Slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms slower than the Samsung S24C450 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a swivelling Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 does not have a swivelling, whereas the Samsung S24C450 has a swivelling.
Does not have a pivot Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 does not have a pivot, but the Samsung S24C450 has a pivot.
Heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 6.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 3.1kg heavier than the Samsung S24C450 (3.5kg).
18% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the HP EliteDisplay S240 are $70.59 which is $10.61 more than the Samsung S24C450 over five years. Show assumptions.
10 Reasons Against
Does not have an HDCP Edit
The Samsung S24C450 does not have an HDCP, but the HP EliteDisplay S240 has an HDCP.
Vastly smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a viewable size, vertical of 324mm, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 527mm viewable height PC monitor (203mm bigger).
12% narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a viewing angle, vertical of 160°, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 170°. That's 8° narrower than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (170°).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (250 cd/m²).
Two less USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a two USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay S240 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Samsung S24C450 does not have a built-in speaker(s), but the HP EliteDisplay S240 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Does not have a built-in camera Edit
The Samsung S24C450 does not have a built-in camera, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 does. Read more

A built in camera allows you to use the monitor for video conferencing.

A built in camera allows you to use the monitor for video conferencing.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over one year
The Samsung S24C450 is 13 months older than the HP EliteDisplay S240.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

32 months Ago 45 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 68.63
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.96
Total running cost $ 70.59
Purchase price $ 249.68
Total cost of ownership $ 320.27
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 58.80
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.18
Total running cost $ 59.98

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.46T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.46 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.39T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.39 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 24"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 3000000:1
BEST
 3000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Viewable Size Diagonal
296.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
527mm
BEST
324mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
24 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2745 x 0.2745 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.45cm 60.96cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
BEST
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Linux Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Linux operating systems supported
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Height Adjustment
130mm 130mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 21 -3 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Wall Mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wall mountable
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
BEST
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 21W
Power Consumption (typical)
35W 30W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
65W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.8kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 188mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 433mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 628mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.1kg
Height (with Stand)
503.6mm
BEST
512.25mm
Depth (with Stand)
239.4mm 224mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
540.3mm
BEST
554.8mm
Weight
6.6kg 3.5kg
BEST
Height
363.8mm 359.35mm
Depth
33.3mm 54.2mm
Width
540.3mm 554.8mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 VGA
BEST
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Other Features

Dimensions (W X D X H) With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.80 x 224 x 512.25
© 2017 Kagoo Ltd Edit Your Email Preferences
Feedback