Share on
LG 55SL5B vs Philips BDM4350UC

LG 55SL5B vs Philips BDM4350UC

(11)
LG 55SL5B
Philips BDM4350UC

Top Prices

PC Rush
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Walmart
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Antonline
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
B&H Photo
Checked 6 hours ago
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 2 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
tech-R-us Store Online
Checked 24 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
23% bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 55SL5B has a display diagonal of 55", however the Philips BDM4350UC is only a 42.51" PC monitor (12.49" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Available from 2 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
4 Reasons For
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC has a response time of 5ms, but the LG 55SL5B is a 12ms response time PC monitor (7ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC has two HDMI ports, however the LG 55SL5B only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by $556
The Philips BDM4350UC costs $555.50 less than the LG 55SL5B.
25% cheaper to run
Over five years the Philips BDM4350UC only costs $128.91 to run but the LG 55SL5B costs $170.94 to run (33% more). Read more

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The LG 55SL5B is a 12ms response time PC monitor. That's 7ms slower than the Philips BDM4350UC (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The LG 55SL5B has one HDMI port, however the Philips BDM4350UC only has two HDMI ports.
$556 more expensive
The LG 55SL5B is more expensive than the Philips BDM4350UC by $555.50.
Six months older
The LG 55SL5B is older than the Philips BDM4350UC by six months.
33% higher running costs over five years
The LG 55SL5B costs $170.94 to run which is $42.03 more to run than the Philips BDM4350UC over five years. Show assumptions.
2 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 42.51" PC monitor. That's 12.49" smaller than the LG 55SL5B (42.51"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Less retailers
The Philips BDM4350UC is only stocked by 3 retailers, whereas the LG 55SL5B is stocked by 5 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
chip.com.my: Editor's Choice
tomshardware.fr: Editor Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

19 months Ago 13 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 170.94
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 170.94
Purchase price $ 1,345.94
Total cost of ownership $ 1,516.88
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 126.90
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 128.91
Purchase price $ 790.44
Total cost of ownership $ 919.35
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

1.1T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
28
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.82T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.82 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
21
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
55"
BEST
42.51"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
 50000000:1
BEST
Display
 LCD
 LCD
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
 Display sRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 953mm
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 543mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2451 x 0.2451
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1200:1
 1200:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 108cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
450 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
12ms 5ms
BEST
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input
 Audio input
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Audio System
Vertual Surround Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 14W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metals Free
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Mac)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Operating systems supported (Mac)
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Unknown - Click to provide data 70,000h

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Networking

Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug & Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
60W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
85W 63.1W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Compliance Industry Standards
 Rohs
 Rohs
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
2.1kg
BEST
14.3kg
Package Height
773.4mm 680mm
BEST
Package Depth
219.6mm 160mm
BEST
Package Width
1,238mm 1,070mm
BEST
Bezel Width (bottom)
18mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (top)
11.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (side)
11.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
2.1kg
BEST
9.7kg
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 630mm
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 259mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 968mm
Weight
1.7kg
BEST
9.4kg
Height
714.9mm 562mm
Depth
38.6mm 82mm
Width
1,238mm 968mm

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data 46.5W
Power Consumption (active)
Unknown - Click to provide data 63.1W
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
Unknown - Click to provide data 1070 x 680 x 160

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Speakers
Yes Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Supply Type
Built-in Power Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Power
20W(10W x 2) Unknown - Click to provide data
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Feedback