Asus PG348Q vs Eizo ColorEdge CS270

(33)
Asus PG348Q
Eizo ColorEdge CS270

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 11 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 14 hours ago
Out of stock
Newegg US
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
7" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG348Q is a 34" PC monitor. That's 7" bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18.72cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus PG348Q is an 86.72cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 18.72cm bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (68cm).
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Asus PG348Q has a response time of 5ms, however the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 15ms response time PC monitor (10ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

0.2W lower power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
Asus PG348Q is 0.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode, but the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 0.7W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.2W higher).
4 Reasons For
Higher height adjustment Edit
Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is 148mm maximum height adjustment, but the Asus PG348Q is only a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (33mm lower).
17% lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 has a power consumption (max) of 86W. That's 14W lower than the Asus PG348Q (86W).
A lot lighter Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 has a weight of 7.7kg, however the Asus PG348Q is an 11.1kg weight PC monitor (3.4kg heavier).
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is 95%, however the average rating of the Asus PG348Q is 90% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
33mm lower height adjustment Edit
The Asus PG348Q has a height adjustment of 115mm, however the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 148mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (33mm higher).
14W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The Asus PG348Q is a 100W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 14W higher than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (86W).
3.4kg heavier Edit
The Asus PG348Q has a weight of 11.1kg, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 7.7kg weight PC monitor (3.4kg lighter).
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the Asus PG348Q is 90%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is 95% (based on 3 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
26% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 27" PC monitor. That's 7" smaller than the Asus PG348Q (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 has a display diagonal (metric) of 68cm. That's 18.72cm smaller than the Asus PG348Q (68cm).
Hugely slower response time Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 has a response time of 15ms, but the Asus PG348Q is a 5ms response time PC monitor (10ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A lot higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 0.7W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, whereas the Asus PG348Q is a 0.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.2W lower).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by seven months
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is seven months older than the Asus PG348Q.

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

13 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 40.49
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 42.75

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
34"
BEST
27"
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Supported Video Modes
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.6mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.7mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2325 x 0.2325 0.2331 x 0.2331
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
86.72cm
BEST
68cm
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
15ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 109

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
115mm 148mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 35
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
50 - -50 -172 - 172
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 9
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Management
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power management
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W
BEST
0.7W
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
Unknown - Click to provide data 34W
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
100W 86W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 RoHS
Compliance Industry Standards
 Rohs
 Rohs
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
15.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
508mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
942mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
320mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
14.9kg 10.6kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
297mm
BEST
561mm
Depth (with Stand)
559mm 245mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
829mm 646mm
BEST
Weight
11.1kg 7.7kg
BEST
Height
109mm 402mm
Depth
323mm 72.5mm
Width
829mm 646mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 AC
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Game Mode
 Game mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback