Eizo RadiForce MX242W vs HP ENVY 34

(9)
Eizo RadiForce MX242W
HP ENVY 34

Top Prices

No prices found
Walmart
Checked 20 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 21 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 12ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the HP ENVY 34 (14ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

2x lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W has a power consumption (max) of 68W, however the HP ENVY 34 is a 150W maximum power consumption PC monitor (82W higher).
Lighter Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 6kg weight PC monitor. That's 2kg lighter than the HP ENVY 34 (8kg).
51% cheaper to run
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is $39.08 cheaper to run than the HP ENVY 34 over five years. Read more
2 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 34" PC monitor. That's 9.9" bigger than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (34"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

30% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a display diagonal (metric) of 86.36cm. That's 25.36cm bigger than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (86.36cm).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
A lot smaller display diagonal Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W has a display diagonal of 24.1", however the HP ENVY 34 is a 34" PC monitor (9.9" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.36cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W has a display diagonal (metric) of 61cm, however the HP ENVY 34 is an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor (25.36cm bigger).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
4 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a response time of 14ms, but the Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 12ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

55% higher power consumption (max) Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a power consumption (max) of 150W. That's 82W higher than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (150W).
25% heavier Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a weight of 8kg, however the Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 6kg weight PC monitor (2kg lighter).
$39.08 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the running costs of the HP ENVY 34 are $76.00 which is $39.08 more than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

25 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.92
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 36.92
Electricity cost - switched on $ 73.83
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.17
Total running cost $ 76.00
Purchase price $ 1,993.95
Total cost of ownership $ 2,069.95
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.51T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.51 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24.1" 34"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1200
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3440 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Separate H/V Sync
 Separate H/V sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
26 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
31 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
324mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
518.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.270 x 0.270 0.232 x 0.232
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
61cm 86.36cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
12ms
BEST
14ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 21:9
BEST
 16:10
 21:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
DVI-I Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
3 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
130mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
0 - 35 -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
-172 - 172 -180 - 180
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Number of OSD Languages
9 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.43W
Power Consumption (typical)
31W
BEST
62W
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.48W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 91kWh
Power Consumption (max)
68W
BEST
150W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Compliance Industry Standards
 Rohs
BEST
 Rohs

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
8.7kg
BEST
9.8kg
Height (with Stand)
553mm 477.1mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
245mm 197.2mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
575mm
BEST
950.8mm
Weight
6kg
BEST
8kg
Height
398mm 374.1mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 93.9mm
Width
575mm 950.8mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 DVI
 DisplayPort
Feedback