Share on
AOC C3583FQ vs Asus PG279Q

AOC C3583FQ vs Asus PG279Q

(28)
(211)
AOC C3583FQ
Asus PG279Q

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 23 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 12 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 1 day ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 2 days ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor. That's 8" bigger than the Asus PG279Q (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the AOC C3583FQ is two, but the Asus PG279Q only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by $167
The AOC C3583FQ costs $582.63, whereas the Asus PG279Q is $749.99.
5 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
$58.32 cheaper to run
Over five years the AOC C3583FQ is $58.32 cheaper to run than the Asus PG279Q. Read more
Moderately better user reviews
The average user review score of the AOC C3583FQ is 80% based on 2 reviews, but the average rating of the Asus PG279Q is 76% (based on 174 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Built-in USB hub Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a built-in USB hub, but the AOC C3583FQ does not have a built-in USB hub.
More popular
The Asus PG279Q is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 315 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the AOC C3583FQ ranks No. 5779.
Six more awards
The Asus PG279Q has 15 awards, but the AOC C3583FQ has 9 awards.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 37 reviews, the Asus PG279Q has an average expert review score of 88%, whereas the AOC C3583FQ has an average rating of 81% (based on 26 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Does not have a built-in USB hub Edit
The AOC C3583FQ does not have a built-in USB hub, but the Asus PG279Q has a built-in USB hub.
Less popular
The AOC C3583FQ is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 5779 by number of sales in our PC monitors, but the Asus PG279Q ranks No. 315.
Six less awards
The AOC C3583FQ has only received 9 awards, however the Asus PG279Q has received 15 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The AOC C3583FQ has an average expert score of 81%, but the Asus PG279Q has an average expert rating of 88% (based on 37 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
A lot smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a display diagonal of 27", whereas the AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor (8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the AOC C3583FQ only has two HDMI ports.
$167 more expensive
The Asus PG279Q is more expensive than the AOC C3583FQ by $167.36.
Fewer sellers
Only 3 stores sells the Asus PG279Q, but 8 sellers sell the AOC C3583FQ. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Five months older
The Asus PG279Q is older than the AOC C3583FQ by five months.
48% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Asus PG279Q are $180.99 which is $58.32 more than the AOC C3583FQ over five years. Show assumptions.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Asus PG279Q is only 76%, whereas the average user rating of the AOC C3583FQ is 80% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

9 Awards
chip.com.my: Outstanding
gamestar.de: Gold
gamezoom.net: Value for Money Award
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pcgameware.co.uk: Silver
play3r.net: Gold
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
xfastest.com: Fastest Media
15 Awards
3dnews.ru: Recommended
chip.com.my: Editor's Choice
cnews.cz: We Want It
Digital Versus: 5 Star
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
HEXUS.net: Innovation
itwriter.ru: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
pckoloji.com.tr: Best product of the Year 2015
pclab.pl: Power Award
pcper.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Recommended
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
uk.hardware.info: Ulitmate

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

15 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 120.66
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 122.67
Purchase price $ 582.63
Total cost of ownership $ 705.30
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 180.99
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 180.99
Purchase price $ 749.99
Total cost of ownership $ 930.98
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.78T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.78 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.1T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
29
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
35"
BEST
27"
Display Resolution
 2560 x 1080
BEST
 2560 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
BEST
 50000000:1
Display
 LCD
BEST
 LCD
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Viewable Size, Vertical
345.87mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
819.84mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 165
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 34 - 209
Pixel Pitch
0.32025 x 0.32025 0.233 x 0.233
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 2000:1
BEST
 2000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
88.98cm
BEST
68.6cm
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms 4ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100%
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
BEST

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
5W
BEST
4W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Windows)
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-3 - 15 20 - -5
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 60 - -60
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
60W
BEST
90W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Height
280mm
BEST
456mm
Package Depth
610mm 300mm
BEST
Package Width
980mm 756mm
BEST
Height (with Stand)
458mm
BEST
552.53mm
Depth (with Stand)
213.6mm
BEST
237.9mm
Width (with Stand)
844.6mm 619.77mm
BEST
Weight
11.6kg 7kg
BEST
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 362.96mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 65.98mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 619.77mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Feedback