AOC C3583FQ vs Asus PG279Q

(3)
(200)
AOC C3583FQ
Asus PG279Q

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Best Buy
Checked 6 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 22 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg UK
Checked 24 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 20 hours ago
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

9 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor. That's 8" bigger than the Asus PG279Q (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
AOC C3583FQ is 88.98cm display diagonal. That's 20.38cm bigger than the Asus PG279Q (68.6cm).
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the AOC C3583FQ is two, but the Asus PG279Q only has one displayPorts quantity.
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the AOC C3583FQ is two, but the Asus PG279Q only has one HDMI ports quantity.
20% higher RMS rated power Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has an RMS rated power of 5W. That's 1W higher than the Asus PG279Q (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Cheaper by $66
The AOC C3583FQ costs $584.48, whereas the Asus PG279Q is $649.99.
4 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
$33.47 cheaper to run
Over five years the AOC C3583FQ is $33.47 cheaper to run than the Asus PG279Q. Read more
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the AOC C3583FQ is 80% based on 2 reviews, but the average rating of the Asus PG279Q is 73% (based on 177 reviews).
4 Reasons For
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², whereas the AOC C3583FQ is only a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Lighter Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a 7kg weight PC monitor. That's 4.6kg lighter than the AOC C3583FQ (7kg).
More popular
The Asus PG279Q is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 584 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the AOC C3583FQ ranks No. 334783.
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 23 reviews, the Asus PG279Q has an average expert review score of 87%, whereas the AOC C3583FQ has an average rating of 70% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus PG279Q (350 cd/m²).
A lot heavier Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a weight of 11.6kg, but the Asus PG279Q is a 7kg weight PC monitor (4.6kg lighter).
Less popular
The AOC C3583FQ is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 334783 by number of sales in our PC monitors, but the Asus PG279Q ranks No. 584.
Expert review Rating is considerably Worse
The AOC C3583FQ only has an average expert score of 70%, but the Asus PG279Q has an average expert rating of 87% (based on 23 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
A lot smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a display diagonal of 27", whereas the AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor (8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20.38cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the AOC C3583FQ is an 88.98cm display diagonal PC monitor (20.38cm bigger).
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the AOC C3583FQ only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the AOC C3583FQ only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Lower RMS rated power Edit
Asus PG279Q is only 4W RMS rated audio power, but the AOC C3583FQ is a 5W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (1W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

$66 more expensive
The Asus PG279Q is more expensive than the AOC C3583FQ by $65.51.
Fewer sellers
Only 5 sellers sells the Asus PG279Q, but 9 stores sell the AOC C3583FQ. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Five months older
The Asus PG279Q is older than the AOC C3583FQ by five months.
45% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Asus PG279Q are $107.18 which is $33.47 more than the AOC C3583FQ over five years. Show assumptions.
Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Asus PG279Q is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the AOC C3583FQ is 80% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 15 Awards
3dnews.ru: Recommended
Digital Versus: 5 Star
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
gamestar.de: Platinum
hardware.info: Ulitmate
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
HEXUS.net: Innovation
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
itwriter.ru: Recommended
pclab.pl: Power Award
pcper.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Recommended
tek.no: Recommended
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

12 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 71.45
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 73.71
Purchase price $ 584.48
Total cost of ownership $ 658.19
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 107.18
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 107.18
Purchase price $ 649.99
Total cost of ownership $ 757.17
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.49T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.49 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.72T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.72 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
35"
BEST
27"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
BEST
 50000000:1
Display
 LCD
BEST
 LCD
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Viewable Size, Vertical
345.87mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
819.84mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 165
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 34 - 209
Pixel Pitch
0.32025 x 0.32025 0.233 x 0.233
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 2000:1
BEST
 2000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
88.98cm
BEST
68.6cm
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms 4ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100%
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
HDMI Ports Quantity
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
RMS Rated Power
5W
BEST
4W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-3 - 15 20 - -5
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 60 - -60
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
60W
BEST
90W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Height
280mm
BEST
456mm
Package Depth
610mm 300mm
BEST
Package Width
980mm 756mm
BEST
Height (with Stand)
458mm
BEST
552.53mm
Depth (with Stand)
213.6mm
BEST
237.9mm
Width (with Stand)
844.6mm 619.77mm
BEST
Weight
11.6kg 7kg
BEST
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 362.96mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 65.98mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 619.77mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Feedback