Share on
AOC C3583FQ vs Asus PG278Q

AOC C3583FQ vs Asus PG278Q

(28)
(504)
AOC C3583FQ
Asus PG278Q

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 19 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 8 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Overstock
Checked 22 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 10 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Checked 17 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
8" bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a display diagonal of 35", whereas the Asus PG278Q is only a 27" PC monitor (8" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Asus PG278Q (160°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Asus PG278Q is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a built-in speaker(s), whereas the Asus PG278Q does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

$87 cheaper
The AOC C3583FQ is $87.36 cheaper than the Asus PG278Q.
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
5 Reasons For
3D Edit
The Asus PG278Q is a 3D PC monitor, however the AOC C3583FQ is not 3D. Read more

Monitors that are 3D compatible are able to display 3D images. Some monitors will require you to wear special glasses to appreciate the 3D affect.

A 3D monitor allows you to view 3D content on the monitor such as 3D films, 3D games or 3D applications.

3x faster response time Edit
The Asus PG278Q is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the AOC C3583FQ (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More popular
The Asus PG278Q is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 3226 by sales volume in our PC monitors, but the AOC C3583FQ ranks No. 5779.
Twenty-nine more awards
The Asus PG278Q has 38 awards, however the AOC C3583FQ has 9 awards.
Expert reviews are better
The Asus PG278Q has an average expert review score of 90% based on 89 reviews, but the AOC C3583FQ has an average rating of 81% (based on 26 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
75% slower response time Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Asus PG278Q (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Worse selling
The AOC C3583FQ ranks No. 5779 by sales volume, whereas the Asus PG278Q ranks No. 3226.
Fewer awards
Whilst the AOC C3583FQ has received 9 awards, the Asus PG278Q has received 38 awards.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the AOC C3583FQ is 81%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus PG278Q is 90% (based on 89 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
8" smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG278Q has a display diagonal of 27", but the AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor (8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Asus PG278Q is only 160° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° narrower than the AOC C3583FQ (160°).
8° narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Asus PG278Q is only 170° horizontal viewing angle, but the AOC C3583FQ is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Asus PG278Q does not have a built-in speaker(s), whereas the AOC C3583FQ has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

$87 more expensive
The Asus PG278Q is more expensive than the AOC C3583FQ by $87.36.
Not as many stockists
Only 7 stores sells the Asus PG278Q, however 8 stores sell the AOC C3583FQ. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Four months older
The Asus PG278Q is older than the AOC C3583FQ by four months.

Awards

9 Awards
chip.com.my: Outstanding
gamestar.de: Gold
gamezoom.net: Value for Money Award
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pcgameware.co.uk: Silver
play3r.net: Gold
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
xfastest.com: Fastest Media
38 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
3dnews.ru: Editor's Choice
allround-pc.com: Recommended Product
Bjorn3d.com: Golden Bear Award
chip.com.my: Outstanding
Digital Versus: 5 Star
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
elektroniktest.dk: Gold
gamestar.de: Platinum
greentechreviews.ru: Editor's Choice
guru3d.com: Top Pick
hardware.info: Gold Award
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
hwa.com.tr: High Performance
hwp.com.tr: Editor's Choice
itwriter.ru: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Must Have
legitreviews.com: Recommended
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
nordichardware.se: Recommended
overclock3d.net: Performance
overclockersclub.com: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
pcauthority.com.au: Hot Award
pcgameware.co.uk: Gold
pcper.com: Gold
prad.de: Very Good
profesionalreview.com: Platinum
techgage.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technolabs.net: Editor's Choice
tek.no: Recommended
teknokulis.com: Gold
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
ua.gecid.com: Gamer's Choice
vido.com.ua: Recommended
xtremehardware.com: Gold

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

15 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 120.66
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 122.67
Purchase price $ 582.63
Total cost of ownership $ 705.30
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.78T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.78 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Display Diagonal
35"
BEST
27"
Display Resolution
 2560 x 1080
BEST
 2560 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
BEST
 50000000:1
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 144
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 89 - 222
Viewable Size, Vertical
345.87mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
819.84mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.32025 x 0.32025 0.233 x 0.233
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 2000:1
BEST
 2000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
88.98cm
BEST
68.47cm
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms 1ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
5W Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
NVIDIA 3D Vision
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
NVIDIA 3D Vision 2
Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA 3D Vision 2

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 120mm
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-3 - 15 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -60 - 60
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
60W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 38.7W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.5kg
Package Height
280mm
BEST
456mm
Package Depth
610mm 300mm
BEST
Package Width
980mm 756mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 7kg
Height (with Stand)
458mm
BEST
554.5mm
Depth (with Stand)
213.6mm
BEST
237.9mm
Width (with Stand)
844.6mm 619.8mm
BEST
Weight
11.6kg Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Feedback