NEC MultiSync P232 vs Samsung S32D850T

NEC MultiSync P232
Samsung S32D850T

Top Prices

No prices found
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
PC Rush
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
One more number of upstream ports Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 is a two number of upstream ports PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S32D850T only has one number of upstream ports.
20mm higher height adjustment Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm higher than the Samsung S32D850T (130mm).
Fourty-five times lower power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 has a power consumption (PowerSave) of 1W. That's 45W lower than the Samsung S32D850T (46W).
3x lower power consumption (max) Edit
NEC MultiSync P232 is 29W maximum power consumption, but the Samsung S32D850T is a 100W maximum power consumption PC monitor (71W higher).
Lighter Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 is a 9.2kg weight PC monitor. That's 200g lighter than the Samsung S32D850T (9.4kg).
6 Reasons For
29% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S32D850T is a 32" PC monitor. That's 9" bigger than the NEC MultiSync P232 (32"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S32D850T has a display diagonal (metric) of 81.28cm. That's 22.86cm bigger than the NEC MultiSync P232 (81.28cm).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S32D850T is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the NEC MultiSync P232 (300 cd/m²).
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Samsung S32D850T has a response time of 5ms, but the NEC MultiSync P232 is an 8ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two more USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung S32D850T is a five USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the NEC MultiSync P232 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
32% cheaper to run
Over five years the Samsung S32D850T is $35.13 cheaper to run than the NEC MultiSync P232. Read more

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
A lot smaller display diagonal Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 has a display diagonal of 23", but the Samsung S32D850T is a 32" PC monitor (9" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

22.86cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
NEC MultiSync P232 is only 58.42cm display diagonal, but the Samsung S32D850T is an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor (22.86cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², but the Samsung S32D850T is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Samsung S32D850T (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The NEC MultiSync P232 has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the Samsung S32D850T only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
48% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the NEC MultiSync P232 are $108.84 which is $35.13 more than the Samsung S32D850T over five years. Show assumptions.
6 Reasons Against
Only one number of upstream ports Edit
The number of number of upstream portss on the Samsung S32D850T is one, but the NEC MultiSync P232 only has two number of upstream portss.
Lower height adjustment Edit
Samsung S32D850T is only 130mm maximum height adjustment, but the NEC MultiSync P232 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm higher).
Significantly higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The Samsung S32D850T is a 46W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, whereas the NEC MultiSync P232 is a 1W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (45W lower).
Higher power consumption (max) Edit
The Samsung S32D850T has a power consumption (max) of 100W. That's 71W higher than the NEC MultiSync P232 (100W).
Slightly heavier Edit
The Samsung S32D850T has a weight of 9.4kg, however the NEC MultiSync P232 is a 9.2kg weight PC monitor (200g lighter).
Older by four months
The Samsung S32D850T is four months older than the NEC MultiSync P232.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

25 months Ago 29 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 81.45
Total running cost $ 108.84
Electricity cost - switched on $ 71.45
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 73.71
Purchase price $ 446.91
Total cost of ownership $ 520.62
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.73T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.73 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
19
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.49T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.49 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23" 32"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 720 x 576
 720 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 720 x 576
 720 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 720p
 576p
 480p
 1440p
 1080p
 720p
 576p
 480p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
 Display sRGB
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 398.5mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 708.5mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 85 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
31.5 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.265 x 0.265 0.27675 x 0.27675
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
58.42cm 81.28cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
8ms 5ms
BEST
DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
75% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
3 5
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
2
BEST
1
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
 Picture-in-Picture
 Picture-in-Picture
Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-50 - 30 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
-45 - 45 -30 - 30
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
 LED indicators

Power

Power Management
 Power management
Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
1W
BEST
46W
Power Consumption (typical)
23W
BEST
60W
Power Consumption (standby)
18W 0.5W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
34kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
29W
BEST
100W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
30 - 80 5 - 90
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 0 - 50

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 VCCI
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 VCCI
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 17.5kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 537mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 356mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 860mm
Weight With Stand
9.2kg
BEST
12kg
Height (with Stand)
337.4mm
BEST
500mm
Depth (with Stand)
227.6mm
BEST
280mm
Width (with Stand)
543.6mm
BEST
741.3mm
Weight
9.2kg
BEST
9.4kg
Height
337.4mm 441mm
Depth
227.6mm 68.5mm
Width
543.6mm 741.3mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Interface Adapters Included
 DisplayPort male - mini DisplayPort female
 DisplayPort male - mini DisplayPort female
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
18W Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

ECO Mode
 ECO mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback