Share on
AOC G2460PF vs Benq EW2750ZL

AOC G2460PF vs Benq EW2750ZL

(35)
AOC G2460PF
Benq EW2750ZL

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 17 hours ago
Amazon US
Checked 15 hours ago
Out of stock
xA Enterprises
Checked 17 hours ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Significantly faster response time Edit
The AOC G2460PF has a response time of 1ms, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

5 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
$43.66 cheaper to run
Over five years the AOC G2460PF only costs $46.84 to run whereas the Benq EW2750ZL costs $90.50 to run (93% more). Read more
One more awards
The AOC G2460PF has 2 awards from expert review sites, however the Benq EW2750ZL has 1 award.
Better expert reviews
Based on 4 expert reviews, the average review score of the AOC G2460PF is 80%, but the average rating of the Benq EW2750ZL is 75% (based on 7 reviews).
4 Reasons For
12% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a display diagonal of 27", however the AOC G2460PF is only a 24" PC monitor (3" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

5% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°. That's 8° wider than the AOC G2460PF (178°).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has two HDMI ports, however the AOC G2460PF only has one HDMI port.
$36 cheaper
The Benq EW2750ZL costs $36.38 less than the AOC G2460PF.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The AOC G2460PF is a 24" PC monitor. That's 3" smaller than the Benq EW2750ZL (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slightly narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
AOC G2460PF is only 170° vertical viewing angle, but the Benq EW2750ZL is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the AOC G2460PF is one, but the Benq EW2750ZL only has two HDMI ports.
More expensive by $36
The AOC G2460PF is $36.38 more expensive than the Benq EW2750ZL.
6 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the AOC G2460PF (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Less retailers
Only 2 stores sells the Benq EW2750ZL, whereas 7 stores sell the AOC G2460PF. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Three months older
The Benq EW2750ZL is older than the AOC G2460PF by three months.
93% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Benq EW2750ZL are $90.50 which is $43.66 more than the AOC G2460PF over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq EW2750ZL has received 1 award, the AOC G2460PF has received 2 awards.
Lower expert review Score
The Benq EW2750ZL's average expert rating is only 75%, however the AOC G2460PF's is 80% (based on 4 reviews).

Awards

2 Awards
chip.com.my: Editor's Choice
SweClockers.com: Good Product
1 Award
chip.com.my: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 45.59
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.25
Total running cost $ 46.84
Purchase price $ 215.38
Total cost of ownership $ 262.22
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 90.50
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 90.50
Purchase price $ 179.00
Total cost of ownership $ 269.50
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.57T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.57 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24" 27"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 146 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 160 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
298.89mm 336.2mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
531.36mm 597.6mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.271 x 0.271 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
170° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
61cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W 4W
Loudspeaker
2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Built-In Subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in subwoofer

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
-45 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
130mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 22 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
-165 - 165 Unknown - Click to provide data
Automatic Shut Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 17
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.22W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
22.7W
BEST
45W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.31W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
 90 - 264
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 110
 110-240
 240
 90
 90-264
 9
 24
 110
 110-240
 240
 90
 90-264
 9

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 93 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 85 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-25 - 55 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.6kg 5.9kg
BEST
Package Height
423mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
187mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
693mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
393.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
244.58mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width (with Stand)
565.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
6.5kg 4.3kg
BEST
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 458.5mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 194.9mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 613.8mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data 28W
Monitor Maximum Video Bandwidth
Unknown - Click to provide data 205

Technical Details

Auto Power Off
 Auto power off
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback