HP Compaq LA2405 vs HP DreamColor Z24

HP Compaq LA2405
HP DreamColor Z24

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
20% faster response time Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the HP DreamColor Z24 (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the HP Compaq LA2405 is three, but the HP DreamColor Z24 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Lighter Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 is a 4.1kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.9kg lighter than the HP DreamColor Z24 (7kg).
Cheaper to run by $34.54
The HP Compaq LA2405 is $34.54 cheaper to run than the HP DreamColor Z24 over five years. Read more
5 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
HP DreamColor Z24 is 178° vertical viewing angle, but the HP Compaq LA2405 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
HP DreamColor Z24 is 178° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° wider than the HP Compaq LA2405 (178°).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² brighter than the HP Compaq LA2405 (350 cd/m²).
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the HP DreamColor Z24 is two, but the HP Compaq LA2405 only has one displayPorts quantity.
Height adjustment Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has a height adjustment, whereas the HP Compaq LA2405 does not have a height adjustment.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the HP DreamColor Z24 (178°).
Marginally narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
A lot dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² brighter).
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The HP Compaq LA2405 does not have a height adjustment, but the HP DreamColor Z24 has a height adjustment.
Four months older
The HP Compaq LA2405 is older than the HP DreamColor Z24 by four months.
4 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has a response time of 6ms, whereas the HP Compaq LA2405 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the HP Compaq LA2405 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
2.9kg heavier Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has a weight of 7kg, but the HP Compaq LA2405 is a 4.1kg weight PC monitor (2.9kg lighter).
$34.54 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the HP DreamColor Z24 costs $71.33 to run which is $34.54 more to run than the HP Compaq LA2405. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

38 months Ago 34 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 34.53
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 36.79
Electricity cost - switched on $ 69.07
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 71.33

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.48T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.48 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 63 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
24 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 325.6mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 520mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.270 x 0.270 0.27 x 0.27
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
61cm 61cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 2
BEST
USB 2.0 Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
3
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 120mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 30 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
-170 - 170 -45 - 45
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
29W
BEST
58W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
39W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 95 - 265
BEST
 95 - 265
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 5
 9
 95-265
 5
 9
 95-265

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
6.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
487.5mm
BEST
525mm
Depth (with Stand)
278.4mm 238mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
556.8mm
BEST
559.4mm
Weight
4.1kg
BEST
7kg
Height
362.6mm 365mm
Depth
64mm 66.5mm
Width
556.8mm 559.4mm
Feedback