Share on
Eizo FlexScan EV2750 vs NEC EA275UHD vs NEC MultiSync EA274

Eizo FlexScan EV2750 vs NEC EA275UHD vs NEC MultiSync EA274

(12)
(8)
(24)
Eizo FlexScan EV2750
NEC EA275UHD
NEC MultiSync EA274

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Adorama
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
Overstock
Checked 21 hours ago
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Adorama
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an HDCP (as does the NEC MultiSync EA274), but the NEC EA275UHD does not have an HDCP.
1ms faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the NEC EA275UHD. That's 1ms faster than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$70.39 cheaper to run
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is $26.15 cheaper to run than the NEC EA275UHD and $70.39 cheaper to run than the NEC MultiSync EA274 over five years. Read more
One more awards
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has 3 awards, however the NEC EA275UHD has 2 awards and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has 2 awards.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 10 expert reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average review score of 90%, but the NEC EA275UHD has an average rating of 80% (based on 5 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has an average rating of 81% (based on 6 reviews).
User reviews are better
Based on 2 user reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average review score of 100%, but the NEC EA275UHD has an average rating of 73% (based on 3 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has an average rating of 93% (based on 18 reviews).
3 Reasons For
20% faster response time Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. That's 1ms faster than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$334 cheaper
The NEC EA275UHD is $334.01 cheaper than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750.
Available from 5 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
1 Reason For
HDCP Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has an HDCP, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750, however the NEC EA275UHD does not.

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
$334 more expensive
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is more expensive than the NEC EA275UHD by $334.01.
Not as many stockists
Only 2 shops sells the Eizo FlexScan EV2750, however 7 retailers sell the NEC EA275UHD. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
5 Reasons Against
Four months older
The NEC EA275UHD is older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 by four months.
More expensive to run over five years by 59%
The NEC EA275UHD costs $70.39 to run which is $26.15 more to run than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the NEC EA275UHD has received 2 awards, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has received 3 awards.
A lot Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the NEC EA275UHD is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 90% (based on 10 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is 81% (based on 6 reviews).
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the NEC EA275UHD is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 100% (based on 2 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is 93% (based on 18 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a response time of 6ms, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the NEC EA275UHD are both 5ms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over one year
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is 23 months older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and 19 months older than the NEC EA275UHD.
Higher running costs over five years by $70.39
The running costs over five years of the NEC MultiSync EA274 are $114.63 which is $70.39 more than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and $44.24 more than the NEC EA275UHD. Show assumptions.
One less award
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has only received 2 awards, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has received 3 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The NEC MultiSync EA274's average expert score is 81%, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 90% (based on 10 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The NEC MultiSync EA274's average user score is 93%, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

3 Awards
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
xtremehardware.com: Silver
2 Awards
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Approved
tomshardware.com: Editor Approved
2 Awards
cnews.cz: We Want It
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

19 months Ago 23 months Ago 42 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 44.24
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 44.24
Purchase price $ 989.00
Total cost of ownership $ 1,033.24
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 70.39
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 70.39
Purchase price $ 654.99
Total cost of ownership $ 725.38
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 114.63
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 114.63

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data

Environmental Impact

0.28T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.28 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.45T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.45 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
11
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.73T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.73 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
19
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 25000:1
 25000:1
 25000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1440
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 832 x 624
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1440
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 832 x 624
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1440
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 832 x 624
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Digital Vertical Frequency
59 - 61 30 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
31 - 89 31.5 - 135 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
335.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
596.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 75 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 135 31.5 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.233 x 0.233 0.155 x 0.155 0.233 x 0.233
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.5cm
BEST
68.47cm 68.47cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms
DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 1 1
USB Version
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPort
1 1 1
HDMI Port
1 1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 4
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
2W 2W 2W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 White
 Black
 White
 Black
 White
 Black
Colour
 White
 White
 White

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 0 - 90 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
155mm
BEST
130mm 130mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
5 - 35 -5 - 30 5 - 30
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Rotating
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Rotating
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 344 -170 - 170 170 - 170
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
Number of OSD Languages
11 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
 LED indicators

Power

Power Management
 Power management
 Power management
 Power management
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W 0.37W
BEST
0.8W
Power Consumption (typical)
22W
BEST
35W 57W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 51kWh
BEST
68kWh
Power Consumption (max)
67W 49W
BEST
57W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 80 20 - 80 20 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 5 - 35 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
7.9kg
BEST
9.1kg 8.7kg
Height (with Stand)
545.2mm 417.9mm
BEST
547.9mm
Depth (with Stand)
245mm 230mm
BEST
230mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
611.6mm
BEST
639.2mm 639.2mm
Weight
5.1kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.8kg
Height
359mm Unknown - Click to provide data 377.8mm
Depth
48.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data 66.5mm
Width
611.6mm 639.2mm 639.3mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
BEST
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
BEST
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data 28W
BEST
35W

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Feedback