Eizo FlexScan EV2750 vs NEC EA275UHD vs NEC MultiSync EA274

(12)
(8)
(18)
Eizo FlexScan EV2750
NEC EA275UHD
NEC MultiSync EA274

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 9 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 10 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Adorama
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: $50.00
Overstock
Checked 23 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 10 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
0.030000000000001cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 68.5cm display diagonal, but the NEC EA275UHD is only a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.030000000000001cm smaller).
1ms faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the NEC EA275UHD. That's 1ms faster than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

25mm higher height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 155mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 25mm higher than the NEC EA275UHD ().
Lighter Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5.1kg weight PC monitor. That's 700g lighter than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (5.8kg).
$41.68 cheaper to run
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is $15.48 cheaper to run than the NEC EA275UHD and $41.68 cheaper to run than the NEC MultiSync EA274 over five years. Read more
One more awards
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has 3 awards, however the NEC EA275UHD has 2 awards.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 10 expert reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average review score of 90%, but the NEC EA275UHD has an average rating of 80% (based on 5 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has an average rating of 83% (based on 1 review).
User reviews are better
Based on 2 user reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average review score of 100%, but the NEC EA275UHD has an average rating of 73% (based on 3 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has an average rating of 93% (based on 17 reviews).
7 Reasons For
20% faster response time Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. That's 1ms faster than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the NEC EA275UHD is four, but the NEC MultiSync EA274 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
2x lower power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
NEC EA275UHD is 0.37W power consumption when in PowerSave mode. That's 0.13W lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (0.8W) and 0.43W lower than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (0.8W).
A lot lower power consumption (max) Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 49W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 67W maximum power consumption PC monitor (18W higher).
$364 cheaper
The NEC EA275UHD is $364 cheaper than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750.
Available from 2 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the NEC EA275UHD is "B", whereas the rating of the NEC MultiSync EA274 is "C".
No data

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, and so does the NEC MultiSync EA274, however the NEC EA275UHD only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a power consumption (PowerSave) of 0.5W. That's 0.13W higher than the NEC EA275UHD (0.8W) and 0.3W lower than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (0.8W).
18W higher power consumption (max) Edit
Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 67W maximum power consumption, but the NEC EA275UHD is a 49W maximum power consumption PC monitor (18W lower).
$364 more expensive
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is more expensive than the NEC EA275UHD by $364.
Not as many stockists
Only 3 stores sells the Eizo FlexScan EV2750, however 5 stores sell the NEC EA275UHD. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
7 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.030000000000001cm bigger).
20% lower height adjustment Edit
The NEC EA275UHD has a height adjustment of 130mm. That's 25mm lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 ().
Four months older
The NEC EA275UHD is older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 by four months.
More expensive to run over five years by 59%
The NEC EA275UHD costs $41.68 to run which is $15.48 more to run than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the NEC EA275UHD has received 2 awards, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has received 3 awards.
A lot Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the NEC EA275UHD is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 90% (based on 10 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is 83% (based on 1 review).
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the NEC EA275UHD is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 100% (based on 2 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is 93% (based on 17 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a response time of 6ms, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the NEC EA275UHD are both 5ms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two less USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a two USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor (as does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750), whereas the NEC EA275UHD only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Significantly higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 0.8W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 0.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.3W lower) and the NEC EA275UHD is a 0.37W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.43W lower).
13% heavier Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a weight of 5.8kg, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5.1kg weight PC monitor (700g lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over one year
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is 23 months older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and 19 months older than the NEC EA275UHD.
Higher running costs over five years by $41.68
The running costs over five years of the NEC MultiSync EA274 are $67.88 which is $41.68 more than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and $26.20 more than the NEC EA275UHD. Show assumptions.
Lower energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the NEC MultiSync EA274 is "C", however the rating of the NEC EA275UHD is "B".
Expert review Rating is Worse
The NEC MultiSync EA274's average expert score is 83%, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 90% (based on 10 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The NEC MultiSync EA274's average user score is 93%, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

3 Awards
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
xtremehardware.com: Silver
2 Awards
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Approved
tomshardware.com: Editor Approved
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

16 months Ago 19 months Ago 39 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 26.20
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 26.20
Purchase price $ 989.00
Total cost of ownership $ 1,015.20
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 41.68
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 41.68
Purchase price $ 625.00
Total cost of ownership $ 666.68
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 67.88
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 67.88

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.28T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.28 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.45T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.45 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27"
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Digital Vertical Frequency
59 - 61 30 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
31 - 89 31.5 - 135 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
335.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
596.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 75 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 135 31.5 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.233 x 0.233 0.155 x 0.155 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.5cm
BEST
68.47cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms
DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
 DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
2 4
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
2W 2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 White
 Black
 White
 Black
 White
 Black
Colour of Product
 White
 White
 White

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
155mm
BEST
130mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
5 - 35 -5 - 30 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Rotating
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Rotating
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 344 -170 - 170 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
Number of OSD Languages
11 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Management
 Power management
 Power management
Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W 0.37W
BEST
0.8W
Power Consumption (typical)
22W
BEST
35W 57W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 51kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
67W 49W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 80 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
7.9kg
BEST
9.1kg 8.7kg
Height (with Stand)
545.2mm 417.9mm
BEST
547.9mm
Depth (with Stand)
245mm 230mm
BEST
230mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
611.6mm
BEST
639.2mm 639.2mm
Weight
5.1kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.8kg
Height
359mm Unknown - Click to provide data 377.8mm
Depth
48.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data 66.5mm
Width
611.6mm 639.2mm 639.3mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
BEST
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
BEST
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data 28W Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback