Share on
AOC C3583FQ vs LG 34UM88

AOC C3583FQ vs LG 34UM88

(28)
(11)
AOC C3583FQ
LG 34UM88

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 20 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 15 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Antonline
Checked 20 hours ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 16 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 12 hours ago
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 1 hour ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BuyDig
Checked 16 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor. That's 1" bigger than the LG 34UM88 (34"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Faster response time Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a response time of 4ms, however the LG 34UM88 is a 14ms response time PC monitor (10ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper to run by $18.10
Over five years the AOC C3583FQ only costs $122.67 to run however the LG 34UM88 costs $140.77 to run (15% more). Read more
5 Reasons For
Built-in USB hub Edit
The LG 34UM88 has a built-in USB hub, whereas the AOC C3583FQ does not.
$92 cheaper
The LG 34UM88 costs $92.40 less than the AOC C3583FQ.
Available from 4 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More popular
The LG 34UM88 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 875 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the AOC C3583FQ ranks No. 5779.
User reviews are a lot better
The LG 34UM88 has an average user review score of 90% based on 10 reviews, however the AOC C3583FQ has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Does not have a built-in USB hub Edit
The AOC C3583FQ does not have a built-in USB hub, whereas the LG 34UM88 does.
More expensive by $92
The AOC C3583FQ is $92.40 more expensive than the LG 34UM88.
Fewer sellers
The AOC C3583FQ is only stocked by 7 sellers, but the LG 34UM88 is stocked by 11 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by one month
The AOC C3583FQ is one month older than the LG 34UM88.
Less popular
The AOC C3583FQ is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 5779 by number of sales in our PC monitors, whereas the LG 34UM88 ranks No. 875.
User review Rating is much Worse
The average user rating of the AOC C3583FQ is 80%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 34UM88 is 90% (based on 10 reviews).
3 Reasons Against
1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 34UM88 has a display diagonal of 34", however the AOC C3583FQ is a 35" PC monitor (1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

72% slower response time Edit
The LG 34UM88 is a 14ms response time PC monitor. That's 10ms slower than the AOC C3583FQ (14ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More expensive to run over five years by 15%
The LG 34UM88 costs $140.77 to run which is $18.10 more to run than the AOC C3583FQ over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

9 Awards
chip.com.my: Outstanding
gamestar.de: Gold
gamezoom.net: Value for Money Award
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pcgameware.co.uk: Silver
play3r.net: Gold
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
xfastest.com: Fastest Media
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

15 months Ago 15 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 120.66
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 122.67
Purchase price $ 602.39
Total cost of ownership $ 725.06
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 140.77
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 140.77
Purchase price $ 509.99
Total cost of ownership $ 650.76
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.78T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.78 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.89T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.89 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
23
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
35"
BEST
34"
Display Resolution
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
BEST
 50000000:1
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Viewable Size, Vertical
345.87mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
819.84mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.32025 x 0.32025 0.2325 x 0.2325
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 2000:1
BEST
 2000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
88.98cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
14ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Flat
 Curved
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Thunderbolt Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
HDMI Port
2 2
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
BEST

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
5W Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 120mm
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-3 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
60W
BEST
70W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 11.3kg
Package Height
280mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
610mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
980mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 8.4kg
Height (with Stand)
458mm 428.9mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
213.6mm
BEST
252.4mm
Width (with Stand)
844.6mm 829.9mm
BEST
Weight
11.6kg 6.3kg
BEST
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 379.8mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 49.2mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Display Modes
 Picture-in-Picture
 Picture-in-Picture
Feedback