Acer CB240HY vs DELL P2715Q

(4)
(119)
Acer CB240HY

Top Prices

No prices found
B&H Photo
Checked 16 hours ago
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 11 hours ago
Out of stock
Adorama
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Acer CB240HY is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the DELL P2715Q (9ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lighter Edit
The Acer CB240HY is a 3.7kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg lighter than the DELL P2715Q (5kg).
70% cheaper to run
The Acer CB240HY is $68.76 cheaper to run than the DELL P2715Q over five years. Read more
User reviews are slightly better
Based on 4 user reviews, the Acer CB240HY has an average review score of 90%, however the DELL P2715Q has an average rating of 88% (based on 117 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a display diagonal of 27", but the Acer CB240HY is only a 23.8" PC monitor (3.2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL P2715Q is 68.47cm display diagonal, but the Acer CB240HY is only a 60cm display diagonal PC monitor (8.47cm smaller).
100 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², but the Acer CB240HY is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² dimmer).
One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the DELL P2715Q is two, but the Acer CB240HY only has one displayPorts quantity.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
14% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer CB240HY has a display diagonal of 23.8", however the DELL P2715Q is a 27" PC monitor (3.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

15% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer CB240HY has a display diagonal (metric) of 60cm, however the DELL P2715Q is a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor (8.47cm bigger).
A lot dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer CB240HY has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², however the DELL P2715Q is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² brighter).
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The Acer CB240HY has one displayPorts quantity, however the DELL P2715Q only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
5 Reasons Against
34% slower response time Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 9ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Acer CB240HY (9ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

26% heavier Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg heavier than the Acer CB240HY (5kg).
Six months older
The DELL P2715Q is older than the Acer CB240HY by six months.
More expensive to run over five years by 234%
The running costs of the DELL P2715Q are $98.19 which is $68.76 more than the Acer CB240HY over five years. Show assumptions.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The DELL P2715Q has an average user rating of 88%, but the Acer CB240HY has an average user rating of 90% (based on 4 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
Digitaltrends.com: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

20 months Ago 26 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.04
Total running cost $ 29.43
Electricity cost - switched on $ 96.26
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.93
Total running cost $ 98.19
Purchase price $ 479.00
Total cost of ownership $ 577.19
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.65T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8" 27"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.1554 x 0.1554
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
60cm 68.47cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms
BEST
9ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 2
BEST
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
 Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
150mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 120 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.8A
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
BEST
 B
Power Consumption (off)
0.35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
23W
BEST
50W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
38kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 95W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.7kg
Weight With Stand
6.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
530.1mm 423.86mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
244.8mm 203.86mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
554.4mm
BEST
640.74mm
Weight
3.7kg
BEST
5kg
Height
331.5mm 379.66mm
Depth
52mm 51.5mm
Width
554.4mm 640.74mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Feedback