Share on
DELL S2240L vs Samsung S22D300

DELL S2240L vs Samsung S22D300

(31)
(73)
DELL S2240L
Samsung S22D300

Top Prices

Ascendtech
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 7 hours ago
In stock
Monoprice.com
Checked 18 hours ago
Delivery unknown
MP3SuperStore
Checked 18 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
113° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL S2240L has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°, however the Samsung S22D300 is only a 65° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (113° narrower).
50% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL S2240L has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°. That's 88° wider than the Samsung S22D300 (90°).
Cheaper by $1
The DELL S2240L costs $0.04 less than the Samsung S22D300.
16% cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL S2240L is $7.24 cheaper to run than the Samsung S22D300. Read more
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the DELL S2240L is 96%, however the average rating of the Samsung S22D300 is 78% (based on 73 reviews).
2 Reasons For
40% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S22D300 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the DELL S2240L (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Available from 2 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The DELL S2240L has a response time of 7ms, but the Samsung S22D300 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Less retailers
The DELL S2240L is only stocked by 1 retailer, whereas the Samsung S22D300 is stocked by 3 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by two months
The DELL S2240L is two months older than the Samsung S22D300.
5 Reasons Against
Hugely narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Samsung S22D300 is only 65° vertical viewing angle. That's 113° narrower than the DELL S2240L (65°).
88° narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Samsung S22D300 is only 90° horizontal viewing angle, but the DELL S2240L is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (88° wider).
$1 more expensive
The Samsung S22D300 is more expensive than the DELL S2240L by $0.04.
More expensive to run over five years by 19%
The running costs of the Samsung S22D300 are $45.45 which is $7.24 more than the DELL S2240L over five years. Show assumptions.
A lot Lower user review Score
The Samsung S22D300 only has an average user rating of 78%, but the DELL S2240L has an average user rating of 96% (based on 29 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

32 months Ago 30 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 38.21
Purchase price $ 149.95
Total cost of ownership $ 188.16
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 44.24
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.21
Total running cost $ 45.45
Purchase price $ 149.99
Total cost of ownership $ 195.44
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
21.5" 21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 8000000:1
BEST
 8000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
267.78mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
476.06mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.248 x 0.248 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
65°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
90°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
54.62cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m²
BEST
200 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Audio Output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Operating Systems Supported (Mac)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Operating systems supported (Mac)

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
 LED indicators

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
18W
BEST
22W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
4.6kg 4kg
BEST
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 377mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 573mm
Weight With Stand
3.7kg 2.9kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
380.2mm
BEST
385.2mm
Depth (with Stand)
175.8mm
BEST
177mm
Width (with Stand)
499.1mm
BEST
511.6mm
Weight
2.6kg
BEST
2.7kg
Height
380.2mm 310.8mm
Depth
175.8mm 53.1mm
Width
499.1mm 511.6mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 AC
 VGA
 AC
 VGA
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data
User Guide On CD-ROM
 User Guide on CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback