LG 49XS2B vs LG 75UH5C

LG 49XS2B
LG 75UH5C

Top Prices

PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 4 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Walmart
Checked 10 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The LG 49XS2B has two HDMI ports quantitys, however the LG 75UH5C only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Significantly lower power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The LG 49XS2B is a 100W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, whereas the LG 75UH5C is a 170W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (70W higher).
Vastly lighter Edit
The LG 49XS2B has a weight of 21.1kg, however the LG 75UH5C is a 41.3kg weight PC monitor (20.2kg heavier).
Cheaper by $2,001
The LG 49XS2B costs $2,000.71 less than the LG 75UH5C.
8% cheaper to run
Over five years the LG 49XS2B is $23.82 cheaper to run than the LG 75UH5C. Read more
2 Reasons For
26" bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 75UH5C has a display diagonal of 75", whereas the LG 49XS2B is only a 49" PC monitor (26" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
54% smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 49XS2B is a 49" PC monitor. That's 26" smaller than the LG 75UH5C (75"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Less retailers
The LG 49XS2B is only stocked by 1 retailer, whereas the LG 75UH5C is stocked by 2 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by two months
The LG 49XS2B is two months older than the LG 75UH5C.
5 Reasons Against
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The LG 75UH5C is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the LG 49XS2B only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
42% higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
LG 75UH5C is 170W power consumption when in PowerSave mode. That's 70W higher than the LG 49XS2B (170W).
49% heavier Edit
The LG 75UH5C is a 41.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 20.2kg heavier than the LG 49XS2B (41.3kg).
$2,001 more expensive
The LG 75UH5C is more expensive than the LG 49XS2B by $2,000.71.
More expensive to run over five years by 9%
The running costs over five years of the LG 75UH5C are $285.80 which is $23.82 more than the LG 49XS2B. Show assumptions.

Date Released

16 months Ago 14 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 261.98
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 261.98
Purchase price $ 3,652.82
Total cost of ownership $ 3,914.80
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 285.80
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 285.80
Purchase price $ 5,653.53
Total cost of ownership $ 5,939.33
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

1.7T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
45
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.9T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
49
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
49" 75"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 4000000:1
 4000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data 500 cd/m²
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
RS-232 Ports
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
RS-232C Ports
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Compatible Memory Cards
 SD
 SD

Networking

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Ports
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
100W
BEST
170W
Power Consumption (typical)
220W
BEST
240W
Power Consumption (max)
260W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 45 0 - 40

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
25.7kg
BEST
49.5kg
Package Height
175mm
BEST
1,122mm
Package Depth
759mm 228mm
BEST
Package Width
1,193mm
BEST
1,816mm
Bezel Width (bottom)
9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (top)
9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
21.1kg
BEST
41.3kg
Height
627mm 960mm
Depth
83mm 58mm
Width
1,092mm 1,681mm
Feedback