Lenovo T1714p vs NEC E203Wi

Lenovo T1714p
NEC E203Wi

Top Prices

Factory Outlet Store
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
Newegg UK
Checked 1 day ago
Adorama
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
Newegg US
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
382cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a display diagonal (metric) of 432cm, however the NEC E203Wi is only a 50cm display diagonal PC monitor (382cm smaller).
Faster response time Edit
The Lenovo T1714p is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the NEC E203Wi (6ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

7 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The NEC E203Wi is a 20" PC monitor. That's 3" bigger than the Lenovo T1714p (20"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
NEC E203Wi is 178° vertical viewing angle, but the Lenovo T1714p is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
NEC E203Wi is 178° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° wider than the Lenovo T1714p (178°).
6% lower power consumption (max) Edit
NEC E203Wi is 17W maximum power consumption. That's 1W lower than the Lenovo T1714p (17W).
Cheaper by $88
The NEC E203Wi costs $142.99, whereas the Lenovo T1714p is $230.95.
3 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
$8.66 cheaper to run
Over five years the NEC E203Wi only costs $17.86 to run whereas the Lenovo T1714p costs $26.52 to run (48% more). Read more

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
18% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a display diagonal of 17", however the NEC E203Wi is a 20" PC monitor (3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12% narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a viewing angle, vertical of 160°. That's 18° narrower than the NEC E203Wi (178°).
A little narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a viewing angle, horizontal of 170°, however the NEC E203Wi is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
1W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a power consumption (max) of 18W, however the NEC E203Wi is a 17W maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W lower).
$88 more expensive
The Lenovo T1714p is more expensive than the NEC E203Wi by $87.96.
Less retailers
Only 1 retailer sell the Lenovo T1714p, whereas 4 sellers sell the NEC E203Wi. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Two months older
The Lenovo T1714p is older than the NEC E203Wi by two months.
48% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the Lenovo T1714p costs $26.52 to run which is $8.66 more to run than the NEC E203Wi. Show assumptions.
2 Reasons Against
382cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
NEC E203Wi is only 50cm display diagonal. That's 382cm smaller than the Lenovo T1714p (50cm).
1ms slower response time Edit
The NEC E203Wi has a response time of 6ms, whereas the Lenovo T1714p is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Date Released

16 months Ago 14 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 26.52
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 26.52
Purchase price $ 230.95
Total cost of ownership $ 257.47
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 17.86
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 17.86
Purchase price $ 142.99
Total cost of ownership $ 160.85
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.12T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.12 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
3
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
17" 20"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1280 x 1024
BEST
 1280 x 1024
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 25000:1
 25000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1366 x 768
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1366 x 768
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 5:4
 5:4
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 81.1
Pixel Pitch
0.264 x 0.264 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
432cm
BEST
50cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 5:4
 16:9
 5:4
 16:9
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data
AMD FreeSync
 AMD FreeSync
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
110mm 110mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 22 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Rotating
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Rotating
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Management
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power management
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.6A
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.35W
Power Consumption (typical)
14W
BEST
15W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 23kWh
Power Consumption (max)
18W 17W
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
 MPR II
 TCO 5.0
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
 MPR II
 TCO 5.0
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Bezel Width (bottom)
Unknown - Click to provide data 17.6mm
Bezel Width (top)
Unknown - Click to provide data 17.6mm
Bezel Width (side)
Unknown - Click to provide data 15.2mm
Weight With Stand
4kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height (with Stand)
447.9mm 350mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
244.2mm 213.9mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
374.5mm
BEST
466mm
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 273mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 53.3mm
Width
374.5mm 466mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
BEST
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data 11W

Technical Details

Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback