Acer B326 vs Acer B346CK vs Acer Predator X34 vs LG 34UM68

(36)
(99)
(53)
Acer B326
Acer B346CK
Acer Predator X34
LG 34UM68

Top Prices

Overstock
Checked 20 hours ago
Delivery unknown
PC Rush
Checked 24 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found No prices found
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
65.5mm bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The Acer B326 is a 398.5mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 65.5mm bigger than the Acer B346CK ().
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer B326 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², whereas the Acer B346CK is only a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (30 cd/m² dimmer) and the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68 are both only 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Built-in USB hub Edit
The Acer B326 has a built-in USB hub, and so do the Acer B346CK and the Acer Predator X34, but the LG 34UM68 does not.
20% higher height adjustment Edit
The Acer B326 has a height adjustment of 150mm, and so does the Acer B346CK. That's 20mm higher than the Acer Predator X34 (120mm) and 30mm higher than the LG 34UM68 (120mm).
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer B326 is "B", whereas the rating of the Acer B346CK is "C", the rating of the Acer Predator X34 is "C" and the rating of the LG 34UM68 is "B".
6 Reasons For
A little bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer B346CK has a display diagonal of 34" (as do the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68), but the Acer B326 is only a 32" PC monitor (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12% bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Acer B346CK has a viewable size, horizontal of 796mm, however the Acer B326 is only a 708.4mm viewable width PC monitor (87.6mm smaller).
5.1cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
Acer B346CK is 86.4cm display diagonal, but the Acer B326 is only an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor (5.1cm smaller), the Acer Predator X34 is only an 86cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.40000000000001cm smaller) and the LG 34UM68 is only an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.040000000000006cm smaller).
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Acer B346CK is two, and so does the LG 34UM68, but the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Built-in USB hub Edit
The Acer B346CK has a built-in USB hub, and so do the Acer B326 and the Acer Predator X34, however the LG 34UM68 does not have a built-in USB hub.
30mm higher height adjustment Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, and so does the Acer B326. That's 20mm higher than the Acer Predator X34 (120mm) and 30mm higher than the LG 34UM68 (120mm).
10 Reasons For
2" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a display diagonal of 34" (as do the Acer B346CK and the LG 34UM68), however the Acer B326 is only a 32" PC monitor (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

50% faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (5ms) and 1ms faster than the LG 34UM68 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has two displayPorts quantitys, however the Acer B326 only has one displayPorts quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of displayPorts quantitys on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68. It is possible that they do not have any displayPorts quantitys.

Built-in USB hub Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a built-in USB hub, and so do the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK, whereas the LG 34UM68 does not.
A lot higher RMS rated power Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 7W RMS rated audio power PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 is only a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (3W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

96% cheaper to run
The Acer Predator X34 only costs $2.74 to run over five years but the Acer B326 costs $54.16 to run (1877% more) and the Acer B346CK costs $65.87 to run (2304% more). Read more
More popular
The Acer Predator X34 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 507 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the LG 34UM68 ranks No. 2065.
Six more awards
The Acer Predator X34 has 8 awards, whereas the Acer B326 has 2 awards.
Expert reviews are better
The Acer Predator X34 has an average expert review score of 81%, however the Acer B326 has an average rating of 74% (based on 16 reviews) and the LG 34UM68 has an average rating of 60% (based on 1 review).
User reviews are better
The Acer Predator X34 has an average user review score of 89%, however the Acer B326 has an average rating of 81% (based on 20 reviews).
9 Reasons For
2" bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 34UM68 has a display diagonal of 34" (as do the Acer B346CK and the Acer Predator X34), however the Acer B326 is only a 32" PC monitor (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The LG 34UM68 has two HDMI ports quantitys, and so does the Acer B346CK, however the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
0.2W lower power consumption (off) Edit
LG 34UM68 is 0.3W power consumption when off, but the Acer B326 is a 0.32W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.02W higher) and the Acer B346CK is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W higher).
Hugely lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 34UM68 has an annual energy consumption of 58kWh, but the Acer B326 and the Acer Predator X34 are both 93kWh annual energy consumption PC monitors (35kWh higher) and the Acer B346CK is an 88kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (30kWh higher).
Vastly lower power consumption (max) Edit
The LG 34UM68 has a power consumption (max) of 53W, however the Acer B346CK is an 88W maximum power consumption PC monitor (35W higher).
2x lighter Edit
The LG 34UM68 is a 6kg weight PC monitor. That's 2kg lighter than the Acer B326 (6kg), 4.8kg lighter than the Acer B346CK (6kg) and 9kg lighter than the Acer Predator X34 (6kg).
$464 cheaper
The LG 34UM68 costs $464.14 less than the Acer B326.
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 34UM68 is "B", however the rating of the Acer B326 is "B", the rating of the Acer B346CK is "C" and the rating of the Acer Predator X34 is "C".
User reviews are better
The LG 34UM68 has an average user review score of 89% based on 52 reviews, however the Acer B326 has an average rating of 81% (based on 20 reviews).

Reasons Against

16 Reasons Against
2" smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer B326 has a display diagonal of 32", whereas the Acer B346CK, the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68 are all 34" PC monitors (2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
Acer B326 is only 708.4mm viewable width, but the Acer B346CK is a 796mm viewable width PC monitor (87.6mm bigger).
A little smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer B326 is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Acer B346CK is an 86.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (5.1cm bigger), the Acer Predator X34 is an 86cm display diagonal PC monitor (4.7cm bigger) and the LG 34UM68 is an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor (5.06cm bigger).
34% slower response time Edit
The Acer B326 is a 6ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Acer B346CK. That's 2ms slower than the Acer Predator X34 (5ms) and 1ms slower than the LG 34UM68 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The Acer B326 is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator X34 only has two displayPorts quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of displayPorts quantitys on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68. It is possible that they do not have any displayPorts quantitys.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Acer B326 is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the Acer Predator X34, whereas the LG 34UM68 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Hugely lower RMS rated power Edit
Acer B326 is only 4W RMS rated audio power, but the Acer Predator X34 is a 7W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (3W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

0.02W higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer B326 has a power consumption (off) of 0.32W, however the Acer B346CK is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.18W higher) and the LG 34UM68 is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.02W lower).
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B326 has an annual energy consumption of 93kWh (as does the Acer Predator X34), however the Acer B346CK is an 88kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh lower) and the LG 34UM68 is a 58kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (35kWh lower).
2kg heavier Edit
The Acer B326 is an 8kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.9kg lighter than the Acer B346CK (6kg), 7.1kg lighter than the Acer Predator X34 (6kg) and 2kg heavier than the LG 34UM68 (6kg).
$464 more expensive
The Acer B326 is more expensive than the LG 34UM68 by $464.14.
Over one year older
The Acer B326 is older than the Acer B346CK by 15 months, older than the Acer Predator X34 by seven months and older than the LG 34UM68 by 14 months.
More expensive to run over five years by 1877%
Over five years the Acer B326 costs $54.16 to run which is $51.42 more to run than the Acer Predator X34. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Acer B326 has received 2 awards, the Acer Predator X34 has received 8 awards.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Acer B326 is only 74%, whereas the average expert rating of the Acer Predator X34 is 81% (based on 14 reviews).
Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Acer B326 is 81%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer Predator X34 is 89% (based on 85 reviews) and the LG 34UM68 is 89% (based on 52 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
Acer B346CK is only 333mm viewable height. That's 65.5mm smaller than the Acer B326 ().
Marginally dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer B346CK has a display brightness of 320 cd/m², but the Acer B326 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (30 cd/m² brighter) and the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68 are both 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (20 cd/m² dimmer).
Slower response time Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 6ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Acer B326. That's 2ms slower than the Acer Predator X34 (5ms) and 1ms slower than the LG 34UM68 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A lot higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 is a 0.32W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.18W lower) and the LG 34UM68 is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W lower).
30kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B346CK has an annual energy consumption of 88kWh, whereas the Acer B326 and the Acer Predator X34 are both 93kWh annual energy consumption PC monitors (5kWh higher) and the LG 34UM68 is a 58kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (30kWh lower).
35W higher power consumption (max) Edit
Acer B346CK is 88W maximum power consumption, but the LG 34UM68 is a 53W maximum power consumption PC monitor (35W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 10.8kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.9kg heavier than the Acer B326 (6kg), 4.2kg lighter than the Acer Predator X34 (6kg) and 4.8kg heavier than the LG 34UM68 (6kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
2304% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Acer B346CK are $65.87 which is $11.71 more than the Acer B326 and $63.13 more than the Acer Predator X34. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is inferior
The Acer B346CK has an energy efficiency rating of "C", but the Acer B326 has a rating of "B", the Acer Predator X34 has a rating of "C" and the LG 34UM68 has a rating of "B".
9 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a display diagonal (metric) of 86cm, however the Acer B326 is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor (4.7cm smaller), the Acer B346CK is an 86.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.40000000000001cm bigger) and the LG 34UM68 is an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.36cm bigger).
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as does the LG 34UM68), however the Acer B326 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the Acer B346CK is a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has one HDMI ports quantity, and so does the Acer B326, however the LG 34UM68 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Lower height adjustment Edit
Acer Predator X34 is only 130mm maximum height adjustment. That's 20mm lower than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (120mm) and 10mm higher than the LG 34UM68 (120mm).
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has an annual energy consumption of 93kWh (as does the Acer B326), but the Acer B346CK is an 88kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh lower) and the LG 34UM68 is a 58kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (35kWh lower).
60% heavier Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 15kg weight PC monitor. That's 7.1kg heavier than the Acer B326 (6kg), 4.2kg heavier than the Acer B346CK (6kg) and 9kg heavier than the LG 34UM68 (6kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Eight months older
The Acer Predator X34 is older than the Acer B346CK by eight months and older than the LG 34UM68 by seven months.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The Acer Predator X34 has an energy efficiency rating of "C", however the Acer B326 has a rating of "B", the Acer B346CK has a rating of "C" and the LG 34UM68 has a rating of "B".
8 Reasons Against
A little smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The LG 34UM68 has a display diagonal (metric) of 86.36cm, however the Acer B326 is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor (5.06cm smaller), the Acer B346CK is an 86.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.040000000000006cm bigger) and the Acer Predator X34 is an 86cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.36cm smaller).
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 34UM68 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as does the Acer Predator X34), however the Acer B326 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the Acer B346CK is a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The LG 34UM68 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (5ms) and 1ms slower than the Acer Predator X34 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in USB hub Edit
The LG 34UM68 does not have a built-in USB hub, however the Acer B326, the Acer B346CK and the Acer Predator X34 have a built-in USB hub.
Lower height adjustment Edit
LG 34UM68 is only 120mm maximum height adjustment. That's 30mm lower than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (120mm) and 10mm lower than the Acer Predator X34 (120mm).
One month older
The LG 34UM68 is older than the Acer B346CK by one month.
Worse selling
The LG 34UM68 ranks No. 2065 by sales volume, however the Acer Predator X34 ranks No. 507.
Vastly Lower expert review Score
The LG 34UM68's average expert rating is only 60%, however the Acer B326's is 74% (based on 16 reviews) and the Acer Predator X34's is 81% (based on 14 reviews).

Awards

2 Awards
01net.com: 4 Star
3dnews.ru: Recommended
No awards found 8 Awards
allround-pc.com: Recommended Product
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
legitreviews.com: Recommended
overclockersclub.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Good Product
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

27 months Ago 12 months Ago 20 months Ago 13 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 52.40
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.76
Total running cost $ 54.16
Purchase price $ 863.14
Total cost of ownership $ 917.30
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 63.83
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.04
Total running cost $ 65.87
Electricity cost - switched on $ 0.48
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 2.74
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.44T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.44 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
11
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.018T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.018 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
No data

Display

Display Diagonal
32" 34"
BEST
34"
BEST
34"
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
24 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
32 - 88 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Viewable Size, Vertical
398.5mm
BEST
333mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
708.4mm 796mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.184 x 0.184 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.315 x 0.315
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
81.3cm 86.4cm
BEST
86cm 86.36cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
320 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 6ms 4ms
BEST
5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 109.7 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in
PC Audio Out
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio out
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
1 2
BEST
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4 Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
BEST
 Built-in USB hub
BEST
 Built-in USB hub
BEST
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data 7W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Grey
 Grey
 Grey
 Grey

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
30,000h 30,000h Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
150mm
BEST
130mm 120mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 25 -5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
-60 - 60 0 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 14
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
BEST
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption (off)
0.32W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
44W 53.6W 0.4W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (standby)
0.39W 0.45W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
93kWh 88kWh 93kWh 58kWh
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 88W Unknown - Click to provide data 53W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 80 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 65 20 - 65 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
15.3kg 14.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data 11kg
BEST
Package Height
710mm 678mm Unknown - Click to provide data 522mm
BEST
Package Depth
225mm 247mm Unknown - Click to provide data 201mm
BEST
Package Width
835mm
BEST
943mm Unknown - Click to provide data 978mm
Weight With Stand
672g
BEST
10.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
Height (with Stand)
623.3mm 589mm Unknown - Click to provide data 548.9mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
266.45mm 267mm Unknown - Click to provide data 252.4mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
737.8mm
BEST
827mm Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm
Weight
8kg 10.8kg 15kg 6kg
BEST
Height
454.6mm 589mm 455mm 379.8mm
Depth
60.96mm 243mm 308mm 49.2mm
Width
739.1mm 827mm 825mm 829.9mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

USB Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 USB port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 300
Resolution
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60
Contrast Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Power Supply Type
Unknown - Click to provide data Internes Netsteil Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 793.77 x 340.19
Feedback