DELL S2715H vs Samsung S27D590 vs Samsung S27E390H

(20)
(99)
(105)
Samsung S27D590
Samsung S27E390H

Top Prices

No prices found
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Amazon US
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
world-bestbuy
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Amazon US
Checked 4 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
A bit bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL S2715H is 68.6cm display diagonal (as does the Samsung S27D590), but the Samsung S27E390H is only a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm smaller).
A lot higher RMS rated power Edit
The DELL S2715H has an RMS rated power of 18W, however the Samsung S27D590 is only a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

7 Reasons For
0.099999999999994cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display diagonal (metric) of 68.6cm (as does the DELL S2715H), however the Samsung S27E390H is only a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm smaller).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as does the Samsung S27E390H), however the DELL S2715H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has two HDMI ports quantitys, however the Samsung S27E390H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
12% lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kg weight PC monitor. That's 500g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.6kg) and 220g lighter than the Samsung S27E390H (4.6kg).
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
28% cheaper to run
The Samsung S27D590 is $11.02 cheaper to run than the DELL S2715H and $2.38 cheaper to run than the Samsung S27E390H over five years. Read more
User reviews are marginally better
Based on 79 user reviews, the Samsung S27D590 has an average review score of 91%, however the DELL S2715H has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the Samsung S27E390H has an average rating of 86% (based on 104 reviews).
6 Reasons For
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as does the Samsung S27D590), however the DELL S2715H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the DELL S2715H (4ms) and 1ms faster than the Samsung S27D590 (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has an annual energy consumption of 37kWh, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 44kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (7kWh higher).
26W lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a power consumption (max) of 29W, however the DELL S2715H is a 55W maximum power consumption PC monitor (26W higher) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 30W maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W higher).
$63 cheaper
The Samsung S27E390H costs $63.24 less than the Samsung S27D590.
More popular
The Samsung S27E390H is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 3316 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the Samsung S27D590 ranks No. 6602.

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², but the Samsung S27D590 and the Samsung S27E390H are both 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
34% slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27D590 (4ms) and 2ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL S2715H is one, and so does the Samsung S27E390H, but the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
A lot higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL S2715H is 55W maximum power consumption, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 30W maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W lower) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 29W maximum power consumption PC monitor (26W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor. That's 500g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.6kg) and 280g heavier than the Samsung S27E390H (4.6kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Three months older
The DELL S2715H is older than the Samsung S27E390H by three months.
More expensive to run over five years by 38%
Over five years the running costs of the DELL S2715H are $39.77 which is $11.02 more than the Samsung S27D590 and $8.64 more than the Samsung S27E390H. Show assumptions.
A little Lower user review Score
The DELL S2715H has an average user rating of 88%, but the Samsung S27D590 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 79 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (4ms) and 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8W lower RMS rated power Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H is an 18W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has an annual energy consumption of 44kWh, but the Samsung S27E390H is a 37kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (7kWh lower).
1W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a power consumption (max) of 30W, however the DELL S2715H is a 55W maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W higher) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 29W maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W lower).
$63 more expensive
The Samsung S27D590 is more expensive than the Samsung S27E390H by $63.24.
Ten months older
The Samsung S27D590 is older than the DELL S2715H by seven months and older than the Samsung S27E390H by ten months.
Worse selling
The Samsung S27D590 ranks No. 6602 by sales volume, however the Samsung S27E390H ranks No. 3316.
6 Reasons Against
0.099999999999994cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a display diagonal (metric) of 68.5cm, however the DELL S2715H and the Samsung S27D590 are both 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.099999999999994cm bigger).
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has one HDMI ports quantity, and so does the DELL S2715H, however the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 280g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.6kg) and 220g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.6kg).
Less retailers
Only 2 retailers sells the Samsung S27E390H, whereas 3 sellers sell the Samsung S27D590. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
8% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Samsung S27E390H are $31.13 which is $2.38 more than the Samsung S27D590 over five years. Show assumptions.
Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27E390H's average user rating is 86%, however the DELL S2715H's is 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 91% (based on 79 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 4 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
gagadget.com: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 34 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 37.88
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.89
Total running cost $ 39.77
Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 28.75
Purchase price $ 299.99
Total cost of ownership $ 328.74
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 29.77
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 31.13
Purchase price $ 236.75
Total cost of ownership $ 267.88
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 8000000:1
BEST
 8000000:1
 8000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 81 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
597.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 5ms 4ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 240

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
1 1 1
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
18W
BEST
10W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metals Free
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
 Mac operating systems supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 15 -2 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
 LED indicators

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17.8W
Power Consumption (typical)
20W
BEST
23W 25W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 44kWh 37kWh
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
55W 30W 29W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 10 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.8kg 6.8kg 6.6kg
BEST
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
BEST
140mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 439mm
BEST
442mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 689mm
BEST
703mm
Weight With Stand
6.7kg 5kg
BEST
5.1kg
Height (with Stand)
445mm
BEST
465mm 452.9mm
Depth (with Stand)
196mm 169.2mm
BEST
181.9mm
Width (with Stand)
611.2mm
BEST
619.5mm 626mm
Weight
4.9kg 4.4kg
BEST
4.6kg
Height
361.5mm 388.6mm 377.2mm
Depth
46.1mm 58.5mm 70.8mm
Width
611.2mm 619.5mm 626mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Auto Power Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9 x 336.3
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback