DELL U2913WM vs DELL U3415W vs Samsung LS34E790C vs Samsung S29E790C

(119)
(190)
(59)
DELL U2913WM
Samsung LS34E790C
Samsung S29E790C

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Checked 5 hours ago
eBay
Checked 20 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 10 hours ago
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 10 hours ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 1 day ago
Amazon US
Checked 12 hours ago
Out of stock
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 1 day ago
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
iMicros
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 20 hours ago
Amazon US
Checked 11 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, and so do the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C. That's 6° wider than the DELL U3415W (178°).
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The DELL U2913WM has two displayPorts quantitys, and so does the DELL U3415W, however the Samsung S29E790C only has one displayPorts quantity.
Three more USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a four USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U3415W only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys and the Samsung LS34E790C only has one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

387mm higher height adjustment Edit
DELL U2913WM is 487mm maximum height adjustment, but the DELL U3415W is only a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (372mm lower) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both only 100mm maximum height adjustment PC monitors (387mm lower).
Manual Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a manual, but the Samsung S29E790C does not have a manual.
Cheaper by $198
The DELL U2913WM costs $467.96 less than the DELL U3415W, costs $554.60 less than the Samsung LS34E790C and costs $198.29 less than the Samsung S29E790C.
8 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
94% cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL U2913WM only costs $5.83 to run but the DELL U3415W costs $105.67 to run (1713% more), the Samsung LS34E790C costs $78.47 to run (1246% more) and the Samsung S29E790C costs $36.01 to run (518% more). Read more
9 Reasons For
15% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 34" PC monitor, and so does the Samsung LS34E790C. That's 5" bigger than the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C (29"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

16% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL U3415W has a viewable size, vertical of 334.8mm, however the DELL U2913WM is only a 308.9mm viewable height PC monitor (25.9mm smaller) and the Samsung S29E790C is only a 283.8mm viewable height PC monitor (51mm smaller).
125.4mm bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 798.2mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 103.6mm bigger than the DELL U2913WM (672.8mm) and 125.4mm bigger than the Samsung S29E790C (672.8mm).
16% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U3415W has a display diagonal (metric) of 86.5cm. That's 13.48cm bigger than the DELL U2913WM ().
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The DELL U3415W has two displayPorts quantitys, and so does the DELL U2913WM, however the Samsung S29E790C only has one displayPorts quantity.
Four mini DisplayPorts quantitys Edit
The DELL U3415W is a four mini DisplayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM only has one mini DisplayPorts quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of mini DisplayPorts quantitys on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any mini DisplayPorts quantitys.

4W higher RMS rated power Edit
The DELL U3415W is an 18W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 4W higher than the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C (14W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Twelve more awards
The DELL U3415W has 13 awards from expert review sites, whereas the DELL U2913WM has 6 awards and the Samsung S29E790C has 1 award.
Slightly better expert reviews
Based on 33 reviews, the average expert review score of the DELL U3415W is 87%, however the average rating of the DELL U2913WM is 84% (based on 25 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung S29E790C is 85% (based on 3 reviews).
6 Reasons For
15% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has a display diagonal of 34" (as does the DELL U3415W), however the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C are both only 29" PC monitors (5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

6° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178° (as do the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C), however the DELL U3415W is only a 172° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (6° narrower).
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S29E790C. That's 4ms faster than the DELL U2913WM (4ms) and 1ms faster than the DELL U3415W (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Larger color gamut Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 99% color gamut PC monitor. That's 8% larger than the DELL U3415W ().
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has two HDMI ports quantitys, and so does the Samsung S29E790C, however the DELL U3415W only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Vastly lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has a power consumption (max) of 77W, however the DELL U2913WM is a 90W maximum power consumption PC monitor (13W higher) and the DELL U3415W is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor (53W higher).
8 Reasons For
3D Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is 3D, but the DELL U3415W is not. Read more

Monitors that are 3D compatible are able to display 3D images. Some monitors will require you to wear special glasses to appreciate the 3D affect.

A 3D monitor allows you to view 3D content on the monitor such as 3D films, 3D games or 3D applications.

4% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung LS34E790C. That's 6° wider than the DELL U3415W (178°).
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a response time of 4ms (as does the Samsung LS34E790C), however the DELL U2913WM is an 8ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower) and the DELL U3415W is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor (as does the Samsung LS34E790C), whereas the DELL U3415W only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 61kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 32kWh lower than the Samsung LS34E790C (61kWh).
Significantly lighter Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a weight of 4.7kg, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 5.8kg weight PC monitor (1.1kg heavier), the DELL U3415W is an 8.4kg weight PC monitor (3.7kg heavier) and the Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kg weight PC monitor (2.7kg heavier).
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Samsung S29E790C has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the Samsung LS34E790C has a rating of "C".
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Samsung S29E790C is 94% based on 56 reviews, whereas the average rating of the DELL U2913WM is 86% (based on 94 reviews) and the average rating of the DELL U3415W is 85% (based on 157 reviews).

Reasons Against

13 Reasons Against
18% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 29" PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S29E790C. That's 5" smaller than the DELL U3415W and the Samsung LS34E790C (29"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a viewable size, vertical of 308.9mm, however the DELL U3415W is a 334.8mm viewable height PC monitor (25.9mm bigger) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 283.8mm viewable height PC monitor (25.1mm smaller).
103.6mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 694.6mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 103.6mm smaller than the DELL U3415W (672.8mm) and 21.8mm bigger than the Samsung S29E790C (672.8mm).
19% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a display diagonal (metric) of 73.02cm. That's 13.48cm smaller than the DELL U3415W ().
4ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a response time of 8ms, but the DELL U3415W is a 5ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both 4ms response time PC monitors (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2913WM has one HDMI ports quantity (as does the DELL U3415W), however the Samsung S29E790C only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Only one mini DisplayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a one mini DisplayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U3415W only has four mini DisplayPorts quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of mini DisplayPorts quantitys on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any mini DisplayPorts quantitys.

15% higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a power consumption (max) of 90W. That's 40W lower than the DELL U3415W () and 13W higher than the Samsung LS34E790C ().
19% heavier Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a weight of 5.8kg, however the DELL U3415W is an 8.4kg weight PC monitor (2.7kg heavier), the Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kg weight PC monitor (1.6kg heavier) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 4.7kg weight PC monitor (1.1kg lighter).
Older by over three years
The DELL U2913WM is 22 months older than the DELL U3415W, three years older than the Samsung LS34E790C and two years older than the Samsung S29E790C.
Seven less awards
The DELL U2913WM has only received 6 awards, whereas the DELL U3415W has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is slightly Worse
The DELL U2913WM's average expert score is 84%, however the DELL U3415W's is 87% (based on 33 reviews) and the Samsung S29E790C's is 85% (based on 3 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL U2913WM's average user score is 86%, however the Samsung S29E790C's is 94% (based on 56 reviews).
14 Reasons Against
Not 3D Edit
The DELL U3415W is not 3D, however the Samsung S29E790C is 3D. Read more

Monitors that are 3D compatible are able to display 3D images. Some monitors will require you to wear special glasses to appreciate the 3D affect.

A 3D monitor allows you to view 3D content on the monitor such as 3D films, 3D games or 3D applications.

Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL U3415W has a viewing angle, horizontal of 172°. That's 6° narrower than the DELL U2913WM, the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C (178°).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U3415W has a response time of 5ms, but the DELL U2913WM is an 8ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both 4ms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A bit smaller color gamut Edit
The DELL U3415W has a color gamut of 91%, however the Samsung LS34E790C is a 99% color gamut PC monitor (8% larger).
One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL U3415W has one HDMI ports quantity (as does the DELL U2913WM), however the Samsung S29E790C only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Two less USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U3415W is a two USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Lower height adjustment Edit
DELL U3415W is only 115mm maximum height adjustment, but the DELL U2913WM is a 487mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (372mm higher) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both 100mm maximum height adjustment PC monitors (15mm lower).
41% higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U3415W has a power consumption (max) of 130W. That's 40W higher than the DELL U2913WM () and 53W higher than the Samsung LS34E790C ().
3.7kg heavier Edit
The DELL U3415W has a weight of 8.4kg, however the DELL U2913WM is a 5.8kg weight PC monitor (2.7kg lighter), the Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kg weight PC monitor (1kg lighter) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 4.7kg weight PC monitor (3.7kg lighter).
More expensive by $468
The DELL U3415W is $467.96 more expensive than the DELL U2913WM and $269.67 more expensive than the Samsung S29E790C.
Less retailers
The DELL U3415W is only stocked by 7 retailers, whereas the DELL U2913WM is stocked by 10 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over one year
The DELL U3415W is 14 months older than the Samsung LS34E790C and two months older than the Samsung S29E790C.
$99.84 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the DELL U3415W costs $105.67 to run which is $99.84 more to run than the DELL U2913WM, $27.20 more to run than the Samsung LS34E790C and $69.66 more to run than the Samsung S29E790C. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL U3415W's average user score is 85%, however the DELL U2913WM's is 86% (based on 94 reviews) and the Samsung S29E790C's is 94% (based on 56 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has one displayPorts quantity (as does the Samsung S29E790C), however the DELL U3415W only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Only one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys and the DELL U3415W only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

A lot lower RMS rated power Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 14W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (as does the Samsung S29E790C), whereas the DELL U3415W is an 18W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Lower height adjustment Edit
Samsung LS34E790C is only 100mm maximum height adjustment, and so does the Samsung S29E790C. That's 387mm lower than the DELL U2913WM (100mm) and 15mm lower than the DELL U3415W (100mm).
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has an annual energy consumption of 93kWh, but the Samsung S29E790C is a 61kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (32kWh lower).
37% heavier Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6kg heavier than the DELL U2913WM (4.7kg), 1kg lighter than the DELL U3415W (4.7kg) and 2.7kg heavier than the Samsung S29E790C (4.7kg).
$555 more expensive
The Samsung LS34E790C is more expensive than the DELL U2913WM by $554.60, more expensive than the DELL U3415W by $86.64 and more expensive than the Samsung S29E790C by $356.31.
Less retailers
Only 3 stores sells the Samsung LS34E790C, whereas 10 shops sell the DELL U2913WM and 7 stores sell the DELL U3415W. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More expensive to run over five years by 1246%
Over five years the Samsung LS34E790C costs $78.47 to run which is $72.64 more to run than the DELL U2913WM and $42.46 more to run than the Samsung S29E790C. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The Samsung LS34E790C has an energy efficiency rating of "C", however the Samsung S29E790C has a rating of "B".
13 Reasons Against
5" smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 29" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2913WM. That's 5" smaller than the DELL U3415W and the Samsung LS34E790C (29"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

51mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 283.8mm viewable height PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 308.9mm viewable height PC monitor (25.1mm bigger) and the DELL U3415W is a 334.8mm viewable height PC monitor (51mm bigger).
Smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
Samsung S29E790C is only 672.8mm viewable width. That's 21.8mm smaller than the DELL U2913WM (672.8mm) and 125.4mm smaller than the DELL U3415W (672.8mm).
Only one displayPorts quantity Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, and so does the Samsung LS34E790C, whereas the DELL U3415W only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Lower RMS rated power Edit
Samsung S29E790C is only 14W RMS rated audio power, and so does the Samsung LS34E790C. That's 4W lower than the DELL U3415W (14W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

4x lower height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a height adjustment of 100mm (as does the Samsung LS34E790C), however the DELL U2913WM is a 487mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (387mm higher) and the DELL U3415W is a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (15mm higher).
Does not have a manual Edit
The Samsung S29E790C does not have a manual, but the DELL U2913WM has a manual.
More expensive by $198
The Samsung S29E790C is $198.29 more expensive than the DELL U2913WM.
Fewer sellers
The Samsung S29E790C is only stocked by 2 shops, but the DELL U2913WM is stocked by 10 stores, the DELL U3415W is stocked by 7 shops and the Samsung LS34E790C is stocked by 3 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by one year
The Samsung S29E790C is one year older than the Samsung LS34E790C.
Higher running costs over five years by $30.18
The running costs over five years of the Samsung S29E790C are $36.01 which is $30.18 more than the DELL U2913WM. Show assumptions.
Twelve less awards
The Samsung S29E790C has only received 1 award, but the DELL U2913WM has received 6 awards and the DELL U3415W has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is a bit Worse
The average expert rating of the Samsung S29E790C is 85%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U3415W is 87% (based on 33 reviews).

Awards

6 Awards
01net.com: 4 Star
alphr.com: Recommended
chinese.vr-zone.com: Editor's Choice
hardware.info: Silver Award
profesionalreview.com: Gold
uk.hardware.info: Silver
13 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwareluxx.de: Value for Money
hardwareluxx.ru: Recommended
itc.ua: Recommended
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
pcforalla.idg.se: Best in Test
tek.no: Recommended
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
tomshw.it: Editor Recommended
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found 1 Award
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

47 months Ago 25 months Ago 11 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 3.57
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 5.83
Purchase price $ 249.99
Total cost of ownership $ 255.82
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 103.78
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.89
Total running cost $ 105.67
Purchase price $ 717.95
Total cost of ownership $ 823.62
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 76.21
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 78.47
Purchase price $ 804.59
Total cost of ownership $ 883.06
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 34.65
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 36.01
Purchase price $ 448.28
Total cost of ownership $ 484.29
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.039T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.039 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
1
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.71T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.71 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.52T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.52 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
29" 34"
BEST
34"
BEST
29"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Viewable Size, Vertical
308.9mm 334.8mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 283.8mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
694.6mm 798.2mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 672.8mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.09 x 0.26 0.2325 x 0.2325 Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2628 x 0.2628
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
172° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
73.02cm 86.5cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 5ms 4ms
BEST
4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91% 99%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 250
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Output
 Audio output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
2
BEST
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1 2
BEST
2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 4
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4
BEST
2 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 18W
BEST
14W 14W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
 Mac operating systems supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture
Height Adjustment
487mm
BEST
115mm 100mm 100mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -2 - 20 -2 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
32W 55W 64W 29.1W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 93kWh 61kWh
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
90W 130W 77W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
11.4kg 16.4kg 14.4kg 10.9kg
BEST
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 531mm 499mm
BEST
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 339mm 325mm
BEST
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 899mm 775mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
8.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data 9.9kg 7.2kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
699.8mm 408.7mm
BEST
552mm 423.7mm
Depth (with Stand)
358.7mm 216mm
BEST
275.5mm 262.6mm
Width (with Stand)
194.2mm
BEST
824.7mm 821.5mm 699.5mm
Weight
5.8kg 8.4kg 7.4kg 4.7kg
BEST
Height
317mm 372mm 364mm 313.5mm
Depth
61.2mm 73.3mm 51.5mm 68.5mm
Width
699.8mm 824.7mm 821.5mm 699.5mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
Manual
 Manual
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 672.8 x 283.8
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback