Acer H277H vs Benq RL2755

(119)
Acer H277H
Benq RL2755

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 2 days ago
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
Newegg US
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 19 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overstock
Checked 1 day ago
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Amazon US
Checked 2 days ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
A lot bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The Acer H277H has a viewable size, vertical of 597mm, however the Benq RL2755 is only a 336.15mm viewable height PC monitor (260.85mm smaller).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Acer H277H has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°, however the Benq RL2755 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Acer H277H has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (170°).
1.4kg lighter Edit
The Acer H277H has a weight of 4.1kg, however the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg heavier).
Cheaper by $89
The Acer H277H costs $89 less than the Benq RL2755.
Better user reviews
Based on 2 user reviews, the average review score of the Acer H277H is 100%, however the average rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94% (based on 103 reviews).
8 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer H277H (300 cd/m²).
Faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a response time of 1ms, whereas the Acer H277H is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Benq RL2755 is two, but the Acer H277H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
25% higher RMS rated power Edit
The Benq RL2755 has an RMS rated power of 4W. That's 1W higher than the Acer H277H (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

VESA mounting Edit
The Benq RL2755 supports VESA mounting, however the Acer H277H does not.
1 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
$5.36 cheaper to run
Over five years the Benq RL2755 is $5.36 cheaper to run than the Acer H277H. Read more
Better selling
The Benq RL2755 ranks No. 431 by number of sales, but the Acer H277H ranks No. 1611.

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer H277H is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Benq RL2755 (300 cd/m²).
3ms slower response time Edit
The Acer H277H has a response time of 4ms, but the Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Acer H277H has one HDMI ports quantity, however the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
34% lower RMS rated power Edit
The Acer H277H is a 3W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 1W lower than the Benq RL2755 (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Acer H277H does not support VESA mounting, however the Benq RL2755 supports VESA mounting.
Less retailers
The Acer H277H is only stocked by 7 sellers, whereas the Benq RL2755 is stocked by 8 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
$5.36 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs over five years of the Acer H277H are $34.19 which is $5.36 more than the Benq RL2755. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Acer H277H is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1611 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Benq RL2755 ranks No. 431.
7 Reasons Against
260.85mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
Benq RL2755 is only 336.15mm viewable height, but the Acer H277H is a 597mm viewable height PC monitor (260.85mm bigger).
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Benq RL2755 is only 160° vertical viewing angle, but the Acer H277H is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Benq RL2755 is only 170° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° narrower than the Acer H277H (170°).
A lot heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kg, but the Acer H277H is a 4.1kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg lighter).
More expensive by $89
The Benq RL2755 is $89 more expensive than the Acer H277H.
Older by four months
The Benq RL2755 is four months older than the Acer H277H.
User review Rating is Worse
The Benq RL2755 has an average user score of 94%, but the Acer H277H has an average user rating of 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

21 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 32.15
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.04
Total running cost $ 34.19
Purchase price $ 190.00
Total cost of ownership $ 224.19
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.83
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 28.83
Purchase price $ 279.00
Total cost of ownership $ 307.83
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.23T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Size Diagonal
336mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
597mm
BEST
336.15mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
55 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
69cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
3W 4W
BEST
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 17
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
27W 24.21W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
40kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
4.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
425mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
217mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width (with Stand)
620mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
4.1kg
BEST
5.5kg
Height
370mm 478mm
Depth
35mm 213mm
Width
620mm 639mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 HDMI
 HDMI
BEST
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Feedback