AOC Q2778 vs Samsung S24E650BW

(38)
(3)
AOC Q2778
Samsung S24E650BW

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 8 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overstock
Checked 15 hours ago
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Amazon US
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 1 day ago
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC Q2778 has a display diagonal of 27", but the Samsung S24E650BW is only a 24" PC monitor (3" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
AOC Q2778 is 68.5cm display diagonal, but the Samsung S24E650BW is only a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor (7.54cm smaller).
A lot brighter display brightness Edit
The AOC Q2778 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², but the Samsung S24E650BW is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The AOC Q2778 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the Samsung S24E650BW (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
Samsung S24E650BW is 178° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° wider than the AOC Q2778 (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Samsung S24E650BW is 178° horizontal viewing angle, but the AOC Q2778 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S24E650BW has a height adjustment, whereas the AOC Q2778 does not have a height adjustment.
49x lower power consumption (off) Edit
The Samsung S24E650BW is a 0.01W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the AOC Q2778 is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.49W higher).
$85 cheaper
The Samsung S24E650BW costs $199.99, whereas the AOC Q2778 is $284.99.
Available from 2 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
$6.99 cheaper to run
The Samsung S24E650BW only costs $29.82 to run over five years whereas the AOC Q2778 costs $36.81 to run (23% more). Read more
User reviews are a lot better
The Samsung S24E650BW has an average user review score of 100% based on 3 reviews, but the AOC Q2778 has an average rating of 81% (based on 26 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
AOC Q2778 is only 160° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° narrower than the Samsung S24E650BW (178°).
A bit narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
AOC Q2778 is only 170° horizontal viewing angle, but the Samsung S24E650BW is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The AOC Q2778 does not have a height adjustment, however the Samsung S24E650BW has a height adjustment.
Significantly higher power consumption (off) Edit
The AOC Q2778 is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24E650BW is a 0.01W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.49W lower).
$85 more expensive
The AOC Q2778 is more expensive than the Samsung S24E650BW by $85.
Not as many stockists
Only 13 retailers sells the AOC Q2778, however 15 stores sell the Samsung S24E650BW. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Two months older
The AOC Q2778 is older than the Samsung S24E650BW by two months.
23% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the AOC Q2778 are $36.81 which is $6.99 more than the Samsung S24E650BW. Show assumptions.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The AOC Q2778 has an average user rating of 81%, but the Samsung S24E650BW has an average user rating of 100% (based on 3 reviews).
4 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S24E650BW has a display diagonal of 24", but the AOC Q2778 is a 27" PC monitor (3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Samsung S24E650BW is only 60.96cm display diagonal, but the AOC Q2778 is a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (7.54cm bigger).
100 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24E650BW has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², but the AOC Q2778 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² brighter).
75% slower response time Edit
The Samsung S24E650BW is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the AOC Q2778 (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Awards

5 Awards
HEXUS.net: Recommended
in4.pl: Best Buy
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pcgameware.co.uk: Gold
pcmasters.de: Value for Money
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 34.55
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 36.81
Purchase price $ 284.99
Total cost of ownership $ 321.80
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 29.77
Electricity cost - standby $ 0.05
Total running cost $ 29.82
Purchase price $ 199.99
Total cost of ownership $ 229.81
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2331 x 0.2331 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.5cm
BEST
60.96cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Recyclable Material
Unknown - Click to provide data 30%
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-4 - 21 -3 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Consumption (off)
0.5W 0.01W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
29.01W 25W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.01W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.8kg
BEST
7.3kg
Package Height
555mm 188mm
BEST
Package Depth
215mm
BEST
433mm
Package Width
729mm 628mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
4.7kg
BEST
5.8kg
Height (with Stand)
470.7mm
BEST
512.3mm
Depth (with Stand)
299.1mm 224mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
640.3mm 554.8mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 359.4mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 55.1mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.8mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback